Really love my kindle. Cheaper books, can carry hundreds of books with me and don't have to worry about getting rid of books so my bookcases don't get too full.
My girl got one to, she loves it.
Really love my kindle. Cheaper books, can carry hundreds of books with me and don't have to worry about getting rid of books so my bookcases don't get too full.
My point isn't about which was the first to market, it's about which one made more of an impact. The Prada has barely left the imprint of a little toe, but the iPhone's massive footprint is still shaking the smartphone landscape.Yeah, but it won't make them any less wrong. So I will be able to feel all elitist and special
That said I'm not disputing iPhone's influence, just the "so much ahead at launch" part.
To be fair, the huge guys in the online ecosystem all influence each other. The idea of a wiki is so ubiquitous now it's tough to imagine an Internet without it.Actually I think Wikipedia is more impressive than smartphones. If you told me a decade ago that we would have cell phones that could basically do all the functions of a computer and have an intuitive touch interface, I would believe that is possible.
But if you told me that an online encyclopedia would have the popularity and influence to change intrusive piracy legislation just by taking their site down for one day in protest, I would never have believed you.
Smartphones are just the way of getting information while sites like Wikipedia, YouTube, Wolfram, etc are the actual sources of information that most people wouldn't have imagined before this millennium.
Actually I think Wikipedia is more impressive than smartphones. If you told me a decade ago that we would have cell phones that could basically do all the functions of a computer and have an intuitive touch interface, I would believe that is possible.
But if you told me that an online encyclopedia would have the popularity and influence to change intrusive piracy legislation just by taking their site down for one day in protest, I would never have believed you.
Smartphones are just the way of getting information while sites like Wikipedia, YouTube, Wolfram, etc are the actual sources of information that most people wouldn't have imagined before this millennium.
Sure, no doubt about that. I agree with general notion, just not with the timestamp, in that iPhone's true impact started not at launch, but a year after it.My point isn't about which was the first to market, it's about which one made more of an impact. The Prada has barely left the imprint of a little toe, but the iPhone's massive footprint is still shaking the smartphone landscape.
.
That's fair enough. I tend to think of the app store being wrapped into the idea of the iPhone, but you're right. It wasn't really feature complete in the sense that it is now until months after launching.Sure, no doubt about that. I agree with general notion, just not with the timestamp, in that iPhone's true impact started not at launch, but a year after it.
Umm..no. iPhone as a who.e changed the whole landscape, but LG Prada was released earlier. At launch iPhone was just a smoother version of Prada, nothing truly new or game changing. Definitely nowhere near "10 years in the future".
The true paradigm shift that iPhone caused happened a year after it launched, when appstore opened. Before that it was just sleeker dumbphone.
Prada Software Details
The real difference: the LG Prada phone's interface is based on Adobe Flash Lite, while Apple's is driven by OS X Quartz and Core Animation, and its applications are built upon the Cocoa frameworks.
If LG's Flash based website for the Prada phone is any indication, this will make the phone suck. Flash is great for quickly making animations for kiosks and demos, but it certainly can't deliver the apps Apple demonstrated.
That's why the Prada phone’s only touted features are watching movies, listening to music, and viewing common file documents. No mention of any web browser at all, no sophisticated email or messaging apps, and only basic support for other common phone features.
But that isn't in the picture. The picture just shows how all phones nowadays look the same, and people commented with "amazing" and "wow", that's what confused me, since I still think that when you're making a touchscreen based phone, it will look like this.The iPhone not only popularized touchscreens, it single handedly killed the non-Wacom stylus and paved the way for modern tablet computing. It was literally a paradigm shift. Variable digital keyboards, clean UIs, and the app economy are all thanks to the iPhone. At the time of its release it redefined what a post PC convergence device could be.
If you look at what "smartphones" existed around the time of the iPhone's release, you get the impression that Apple reached ten years into the future and grabbed the coolest thing they could find.
I'm dumbfounded not to see HDTVs as a major player in this conversation. Circa 2000, the vast majority of TVs being sold were tube TVs with comparatively small screens, without widescreen aspect ratios, and that took up a ton of space and weighed a billion pounds.
Maybe the technology technically predates the decade, but when it was popularized counts for more than when it was conceived, imo.
The idea of an all-touchscreen device with a functional and adaptable UI was not really in place before the iPhone. That's without mentioning the Apple understanding of the entire device deferring to the screen.But that isn't in the picture. The picture just shows how all phones nowadays look the same, and people commented with "amazing" and "wow", that's what confused me, since I still think that when you're making a touchscreen based phone, it will look like this.
I'm not doubting the influence the iPhone in any way. I just think it's weird to say that all of them copied the complete look of the iPhone. (which I think the pic is highly suggesting)
Plus I can deposit checks to my bank account by taking a picture of them with my phone. That's amazing.
22nm transistor. In 10 years probably the 4 nm transistor.
It's the lifeblood of innovation.
Smartphones are products, not tech.
So, what's your explanation for the iphone's success over the amazing LG Prada? Apple fans?
I'm surprised by the immense smartphone-love.
My vote: 1080p HDTVs
MP3s.