DaddyZ said:
Why not eat fruit? I would just like to know...im curious.
Sugar. There's a really long theory to it, but basically when you're type 1, you have ZERO insulin, so anything I eat has to be timed w/ insulin to avoid big jumps in blood sugar (which, over time, lead to the effects everyone's heard about), the only problem is that even the fastest-acting insulin, which begins acting after about 15 minutes, doesn't act all at once, so when you have as much sugar as is in an apple you can either take more than you need to take care of the after-eating (postprandial) increase and risk pretty low blood sugar (very low if you've eaten a lot of fast-acting sugar) or take the right amount, but deal with a slightly high blood sugar for a few hours until the insulin is finally done acting. Basically there's no right way to do it, you're always going to have some errors in there. Also, you're taking in these fast-acting sugars (granted, they're not processed at least) and you have no real way to know how much you're taking in so even what should be a simple ratio calculation is made perilous.
Yet there is still this issue w/ even labeled foods. Did you know FDA regulations allow a
20% margin of error in labeling? Do you have any idea what this means for a type 1 diabetic? I don't even think most type 1 diabetics are aware of this and it's another reason that diabetics need to avoid any substantial amount of carbs, b/c 20% of 4g is 1g, a negligible error but 20% of 60g (less than a Subway sub) is 12g and makes a much bigger impact, up or down . And when you take all of this into account, it's no surprise that even today most doctors basically just assume diabetics are going to have complications of some sort requiring eye surgery, dialysis, and other frightening things within 20-30 years at best. They literally don't even try to get people to have normal blood sugars all the time. One of the reasons is b/c they know that's impossible under their current dietary recommendations of 100g+ and they're afraid to advocate something "radical" like a modestly low-carb diet (30g/day) even though nearly all their support for why low carb diets are "dangerous" is being
shot down all the time, and such a diet is so beneficial to a diabetic in particular that I think their actions border on the criminally negligent, but dogma is dogma, especially in the medical profession.
Basically, my diet is not what is the ideal for a normal person, but what is ideal for a type 1 diabetic. Effects-wise it basically makes it as if I don't have diabetes (I still have to take insulin of course, though much less, and check my sugars all the time) and I can avoid all complications just like the guy who came up w/ the diet, Dr. Bernstein, who is the oldest type 1 diabetic now I believe, and the divergence from a "regular ideal" diet is less than you might think, particularly when you factor in the exercise plan. Fruits are great and very healthy, and I would eat them if I didn't have very compelling medical reasons not to because I really do enjoy them, but I am very happy w/ this plan and I'll take no bread/fruit over dialysis/blindness/amputation any day.