S
SpongebobSquaredance
Unconfirmed Member
So I went on Metacritic, and what I found was this:
and it boggled my mind... because the original is awesome!
Monster World IV is one of the best titles the MegaDrive/Genesis has to offer and I always thought it was seen as a highlight on Sega Ages compilations and other rereleases.
So what happened here?
Is it the graphics?
They are certainly different, but I don't think the game looks shabby. It's a well-looking remake.
So what else is it?
but did it really age poorly? I don't think so. Plays fine, isn't painfully difficult, looks good, levels are well designed, the soundtrack has some nice compositions.
So what is it then? Is it just a poor remake? Maybe, the aforementioned review also mentions this:
I'm just sitting here and be like "fuck all that shit, most critics have a shitty taste" ... the only somewhat logical conclusion I can come up with is that the latest title is that good that it makes other titles in the series look bad by comparison.
oh well... whatever
Wonder Boy: Asha in Monster World Reviews
An icon in adventure gaming history is back! Wonder Boy: Asha in Monster World becomes a real Wonder Boy adventure that stays true to its roots as the latest part of the legendary and successful series, that dates back to 1986. Asha is tasked to free the four spirits being confined by evil...
www.metacritic.com
Monster World IV is one of the best titles the MegaDrive/Genesis has to offer and I always thought it was seen as a highlight on Sega Ages compilations and other rereleases.
So what happened here?
Is it the graphics?
They are certainly different, but I don't think the game looks shabby. It's a well-looking remake.
So what else is it?
uh.. okaySadly, Wonder Boy Asha in Monster World is just a 3D version of a game that hasn't aged well. It would have been great if Asha and Pepelogoo had more of remake than a colourful remaster that only shows that the original game was not as good as The Dragon's Trap or Wonder Boy in Monster World.
but did it really age poorly? I don't think so. Plays fine, isn't painfully difficult, looks good, levels are well designed, the soundtrack has some nice compositions.
So what is it then? Is it just a poor remake? Maybe, the aforementioned review also mentions this:
...and I think is a legit point to make. Other than that the consensus is: good remake, but bad (or the obligatory "poorly aged") source material... but Monster World IV aged perfectly fine, it's one of the greats of that era.The move to 3D turns a single 16-bit gaming screen into multiple lanes. And it's empty, not alive, with repetitions of an arrangement that we already know
I'm just sitting here and be like "fuck all that shit, most critics have a shitty taste" ... the only somewhat logical conclusion I can come up with is that the latest title is that good that it makes other titles in the series look bad by comparison.
oh well... whatever
Last edited by a moderator: