VictimOfGrief said:Queue up the Xbox 1.5 comments. Come Sony Fanboi's.... do it! :lol
araganekyassuru said:go buy the real BF2 ffs
DMczaf said:Ok, go buy me a new video card.
VictimOfGrief said:Queue up the Xbox 1.5 comments. Come Sony Fanboi's.... do it! :lol
araganekyassuru said:you could've gotten a really good card for the $399 your 360 cost
Fallout-NL said:Youre forgetting the new motherboard/processor/memory that go with the 400 dollar card.
Mike Works said:24 players
with plenty of lag
Deg said:No it wont have lag. The PS2 version had no lag why would 360?
Yamaha98 said:Comparing these shots to the PS2/Xbox is pretty lame when it was expected that the previous generation could not support more than 24 players, did not include aircraft nor the centralized-role of commander from the PC version.
Yet, this continues on from the previous gen's shortcomings only w/ upgraded textures as it's main feature. The 360 is easily as potent as a top of line PC these days, why could we not get 64 players? What was the restrictions in not including airplanes, physics? I thought the commander role made BF2 standout from other FPS, why remove it here?
No sale for lame port here.
Deg said:Wouldnt BF2 be a nightmare to port with it using 2GB of RAM and heavy HD access on pc.
Yamaha98 said:It is not as simple as you may perceive. I am sure Dice can optimize BF2 for 360 specs easily, it's just seems like they went the easy way out- ie, bring over what they already created for PS2/Xbox but spend the extra time to touch up the graphics.
Yamaha98 said:but it should have not been an issue to port it over to next-gen. .
dskillzhtown said:and the money I will need to buy all new stuff 2 years later.
araganekyassuru said:you could've gotten a really good card for the $399 your 360 cost
Wafflecopter said:Anti-PC bots are funny :lol
krypt0nian said:No I just want more than 4-5 good games a year. Nothing funny about that at all.
whutkrypt0nian said:No I just want more than 4-5 good games a year.
bishoptl said:whut
Wafflecopter said:I guess ignorance is bliss.
Yusaku said:You're right, that's way better than $60 games and $2000 HDTVs.
Wafflecopter said:Anti-PC bots are funny :lol
Deg said:Looking good. Getting better. Sure its no BF2 but its an enjoyable game and console gamers should love this.
For the record this is the xbox/Ps2 version:
![]()
:lol :lol Wow. Check the PC thread for 2006 buddy. All of that >what consoles have this year. And to the person who made the PC bot list......add me on therekrypt0nian said:Sorry not really into RTS usually. So its the best of the FPS' and the decent RPG's.
WoW is my main PC game.
You cannot compare the upcoming console release lists with the PC. I get PC Gamer monthly and see very little that appeals to me.
Let me know how that works out for you.
Deg said:I dont think a pc to console port would be wise anyway. I dont think the 360 or PS3 could do justice to BF2 anyway.
hukasmokincaterpillar said:I love me some BF2, but you've got to be joking. On a technical level the BF2 engine could be run in either systems sleep. Unless you mean the interface side of things, squad management, commander etc. I'd agree there to an extent, PC is the best environment for that kind of thing. But a smart developer could find a way to translate that pretty seamlessly I think.
Wafflecopter said:Obviously not. No jets and 24 players?
ram said:this wa sthe first build of the ps2/xbox version. a year later, the game looked much better.
![]()
truffleshuffle83 said:OMG youve played GRAW??? in no way does battlefield: modern combat (xbox) play better than ghost recon. i can barely get past the visuals nevertheless the gameplay. its fun, but summit strike destroys it
Deg said:I have hardly taken part in either of these games multiplayer since all 3 dont compare to BF2 pc. You'll have more fun with Modern combat out of the console games however. Bear in mind its quite arcadey there's music in multiplayer unlike BF2 pc etc.