1) Implies a friendship with a girl is basically meaningless, of no value at all.
No, It implies that one person wants more than the other. Friend-zone isn't just a thing that happens to guys.
People will tackle this in a logical way, saying that to them friendship with a girl isn't meaningless, the fact is words are about communication and in communication one cannot control the outcome of the interaction, because what a guy considers friendship and what I consider friendship and what some other girl considers friendship are three different things, shaped by our experiences and by the way we process them. So unless someone's using "friendzone" strictly on the internet, the very fact of using this awful term will blow away chances with possible girlfriends and will also change the way girls in a guy's life perceive him.
I just have to stress that the term 'friendzone' is meaningless if both the people involved are 'in the friendzone', as that's called 'being friends'. This is the strict implication that one person wants more than the other, and as such, it is painful to just be friends, and it is also mean of anyone to keep someone they should be able to pick up wished they could have more, and keep them around for comfort. If a person is frustrated with only being your friend, that's their shortcoming, since it infers that they're not doing anything about it. But that doesn't mean that you should allow that frustration to happen.
So this has nothing to do with the way it is to be friends with a girl, and more how it is to be friends with someone you wished you had more with.
2) Implies a guy was never after anything remotely tied to her personality.
Not at all. They might be so awesome that you want to be more than friends. How having feelings beyond friendship is considered platonic is completely lost on me, as it is the quiet opposite of something platonic.
People will rationalize this in every way they see fit to look like they weren't interested about the looks of a girl, but again: if the girl one likes so much is so cool, and so friendly, and so smart, which are appealing qualities no matter what, why didn't he keep her around after she rejected him? Her coolness, friendliness or her smarts shouldn't magically grow or wither because she does or doesn't want to have sex with him.
Why is this so much about sex? The guy might wish to share his life with her.
Thinking that somehow a girl who wants a guy as friend (either because she really wants to or because it's the least harmful way of get him out of her air) does so because she doesn't care about him at all, or doesn't find him interesting at all, is a mind-set that will keep a guy shooting himself in the foot. Between what people say and what they really want, there's a very big, wide gap.
I think it's sad that some guys get dictated and keep banging their heads against the wall by not distancing themselves from girl that aren't interested, but equally much so, it is not OK for a girl to reject a guy, then keep him around as a friend. In most cases, the one person will just pretend that the other person's feelings aren't there, while the other will be happy that they get to spend time with them, but sad they can't be with them. Dragging them through that is selfish.
Once at that point, a guy thinks all the hard-work is done and it's time to fart and burp all the time like it's something to take pride into, to talk about the way you fuck her to all your friends so the next time they see her they greet her with a smirk which leaves her puzzled, to have her listen to each and every single one of your theories about the world, people, women (because you know EVERYTHING), and to blatantly ogle other girls in front of her because, hey, the Man is a hunter.
..Are you OK? This sounds like it's coming from experience.
As I've said before: a girlfriend can change her opinion of you overtime and leave you, in the same fashion a friend can change her opinion of you overtime and decide to be your girlfriend.
Yes, but if you reject a guy, then keep him around until you find it right to be with him, you're selfish, and he's been hurt a long the way.
4) It's a self-defeating argument.
A guy automatically associates being friends with a girl as being some sort second-rate citizen: "I can't give you sex, but hey I'll smile at you and say hi if you really can't be away from me AT ALL".
If you find a guy so amazing you wish to be his girlfriend, wouldn't it kill you that he doesn't feel the same? How is this about the girl, in this situation? It's not cool to not be able to get the person you want.
What if a girl really would like you as a friend? why would someone outright think that's a definitive sentence of one's own value?
Again, it's painful. Why does a girl in this situation think it's OK to keep a guy that obviously has feelings for her around as a friend? That's selfish. Hopefully the guy will distance himself to move on.
(it's funny to see how many people who post stuff about some horrible war tragedy ALSO play games like Call of Duty in absolute denial of what is the instinct they are feeding into).
Uh, what?
Using terms like "female", "friend-zone", "a 10", "chick", "slut", has the only counterproductive result of make someone look like a macho who elaborated a form of slang to (be)rate girls and especially the girls who refuse him, as the only stratagem to keep his dignity intact.
Actually, coining someone as "a 10" is only counter-productive for the guy, since it's essentially saying "she's so out of my league". You're also seemingly denying that we do perceive each other for, also, how we look. There's nothing wrong with that. That some guys go into a defense-mode when they're turned down and say things like "she's probably a slut, anyway", is sad, but it's just sad for that person, that's unable to take criticism. But live and let live, since we are able to take criticism, and as such, aren't doomed to make the same mistakes over and over.
[/QUOTE]People who underestimate the value of politically correct and see it as a cage instead of a social lubricant (like a fine wine or a cold beer), will keep trapping their emotions inside themselves unable to deal with their rage, their horniness and their ambition, while idolizing the (fictional) men who let it all out and crush everything and everyone in their way, Eisenberg-style.[/QUOTE]
Do you mean social conventions? I can't see a correlation between underestimating conventions and bottling emotions up inside. If you're a guy that's been rejected by a girl, you're stupid to keep hanging around her, because you should move on and move past the feelings you have for her. But if the girl rejects a guy, and then takes no responsibility to not hurt the guy - well, personally, I perceive that as morally wrong.