Miles Quaritch
Member
My guess would be either live today or tomorrow.
Probably tomorrow.
Thanks. Will be interesting to see just how bad it gets...
My guess would be either live today or tomorrow.
Probably tomorrow.
What the hell is this? "Must have been..." Really?! Can't they actually do an accurate analysis instead of saying it must have been? Idiots.
Give the benefit of the doubt. Respawn said they are going to be improving it over the course of the game. It can and will not be an issue.
Give the benefit of the doubt. Respawn said they are going to be improving it over the course of the game. It can and will not be an issue.
Single digits on a last gen resolution on a very old engine. I not likey.
But the final is still like around 790p right?
Yea I've gotta say this just sounds like something erroneous, I'm sure it'll get fixed really soon. Game like this was built from the ground up to glide at 60.
Should have kept it at 720p.
I bet respawn had pressure on them to up the resolution late in development after resolution-gate and CBOAT and this is the price they pay.
The beta certainly didn't "glide at 60", don't expect a patch to be able to to much about this. The optimization work is pretty much done.
He's not DF, he's just guessing as to how low the framerate went. You don't need to insult him just because he didn't meet your framerate-measuring standards.
Yea I've gotta say this just sounds like something erroneous, I'm sure it'll get fixed really soon. Game like this was built from the ground up to glide at 60.
There is a reason the title of this thread isn't titled 'TitanFall framerate in mech combat drops to single digits"
Because it's inflamatory with no evidence to support it at all. I guess your standards are very low for gaming journalists.
bullshit. a drop from 60 to 30 is still perfectly playable, whereas a drop from 30 to single figures is not.
Yea I've gotta say this just sounds like something erroneous, I'm sure it'll get fixed really soon. Game like this was built from the ground up to glide at 60.
MS didn't develop or publish TitanFall.ROFL
What a joke MS is. Their flagship title looks like a last gen game and performs like one too.
It's still unacceptable for a fast paced CoD-like shooter.
MS didn't develop or publish TitanFall.
And you'll be lucky if they can fix it. Just look at Battlefield 4 as a recent EA game that, to this day, is still getting fixes and it's still not fixed or even close to it. And we're not talking about launch games anymore. Devs have had access to these machines with their final specs for at least 5-6 months. It might get better, maybe, but it also might just not really change.
Does it glide like this glider did?
![]()
It's still their flagship title for Next Gen, at least until E3. Dat promotion.MS didn't develop or publish TitanFall.
How is it meaningless? They're not responsible for the game's technical competency.MS paid for exclusivity, that type of clarification is meaningless to his point. It is their flagship title.
Give the benefit of the doubt. Respawn said they are going to be improving it over the course of the game. It can and will not be an issue.
MS didn't develop or publish TitanFall.
They were just talking about increasing the resolution in a patch.The beta certainly didn't "glide at 60", don't expect a patch to be able to to much about this. The optimization work is pretty much done.
How is it meaningless? They're not responsible for the game's technical competency.
But for being such a prominent title launching exclusively on their platforms, I would have expected them to have lent more support and supervision to bring the game up to par rather than the extensive PR and marketing campaign they have been focusing on. It just strikes me as outright bizarre.How is it meaningless? They're not responsible for the game's technical competency.
Would you say there's a console war going on?
MS didn't develop or publish TitanFall.
Naw, i just know how people work. He gave an impression of the game and it's his impression. Sucks that his impression doesn't meet your standards, though. This has to be very frustrating for you.
What do you mean by 'let'?You think they don't have the power to let EA polish the game up and postpone the release?
Yea I've gotta say this just sounds like something erroneous, I'm sure it'll get fixed really soon. Game like this was built from the ground up to glide at 60.
it's still the difference between playable and unplayable, so to suggest that 60->30 and 30->~8 are 'just as bad' as each other is absurd
So much shit surrounds this game. I'll just wait until it's out in the wild and you all are playing it. Just don't feel like I can trust the media on big games; positive or negative.