John Harker
Definitely doesn't make things up as he goes along.
Well, I hope he's wrong about there being no on-stage conference this year again...
When did he say that?
Well, I hope he's wrong about there being no on-stage conference this year again...
I think Miyamoto was talking about the company overall rather than he himself working on a flagship title for the QOL platform. It wouldn't really matter to me either way but he has probably already been working on something for a while.I'd hope so, but they also said Miyamoto is producing flagship ,,software'' for QOL right now, so it might not be as out of place. Wii Fit was at E3 too...
Likely a Direct. They have nothing that will stand up to the VR madness of this years E3.
This gen is lost they need to release their new platform ASAP, likely next year. It needs to be more powerful than PS4 even if slightly, ready to go with VR, and maybe a QOL thing or two to differentiate. WiiU is dead, don't waste energy trying to revive it.
Well, I hope he's wrong about there being no on-stage conference this year again...
That said, I dunno if they are doing a press conference or not this year...
I just know where they aren't doing one.
Hopefully to entirely skip the activity.What will Nintendo do at E3 2014?
Last time (Little Mac reveal) they had a Youtube stream that was working pretty much flawlessly while Ustream was having a hard time.
ok. It is a lovely corpse then, I love the rotten smell of MK8, Bayo 2, X, SSB. Hyrule Warriors and Zelda U.
Hopefully to entirely skip the activity.
E3 is a paraphernalia of stupid proportions to waste develper's and gamer's time for no substantial reason, save for the benefit of the mass and speciality media.
A monumental waste of money, in the case of Nintendo even more serious, since they have been in the red for a lot of quarters.
Would prefere 2 big directs, one a month before the other athe following one.
It feels me with grief seen people invested in videogames supporting this monstrosity one way or the other.
Almost all companies at E3 have been in the red for quite some time, and most don't have the war chest Nintendo has. Money isn't really the issue.Hopefully to entirely skip the activity.
E3 is a paraphernalia of stupid proportions to waste develper's and gamer's time for no substantial reason, save for the benefit of the mass and speciality media.
A monumental waste of money, in the case of Nintendo even more serious, since they have been in the red for a lot of quarters.
Would prefere 2 big directs, one a month before the other athe following one.
It feels me with grief seen people invested in videogames supporting this monstrosity one way or the other.
I kinda agree. Some "special event" E3 Nintendo Directs with a higher production value than the regular Directs would actually be pretty cool. Like it's been said, if they do those (one for 3DS + one for Wii U) the white background needs to go. It would also be cool if all of them - Reggie, Iwata, Shibata and Miyamoto - were present at the same time, doing live demos and shit.
The best thing Nintendo could do at E3 is have Iwata on stage announcing his resignation and introducing some forward-thinking, innovative and renowned leader from the gaming/tech industry as the company's new President. This would be far more exciting than any individual game announcement they could possibly make at this point and much more effective at restoring my faith in the company.
And whatever they do needs to be IN the trade show's floors. Nintendo Direct is awkward and embarrassing.
When did he say that?
And whatever they do needs to be IN the trade show's floors. Nintendo Direct is awkward and embarrassing.
1. Money is always an issue. And no, im not implying Nintendo doesn't have the funds to expend a couple of mills on the show. But since even the presient got a pay cut, then keep up with the example by cutting this unnecessary expense.Almost all companies at E3 have been in the red for quite some time, and most don't have the war chest Nintendo has. Money isn't really the issue.
Yes, Iwata is that guy. Nintendo is just some adjustments away of greatness and that starts with them been less "cheap" and more long term thinking.Actually, it seems Iwata is that guy, but the board of directors holds (or held) him back. Him resigning wouldn't change a thing - in fact, he's probably more capable to change the basic structure than any outsider, especially after the Wii U failure.
Actually, it seems Iwata is that guy, but the board of directors holds (or held) him back. Him resigning wouldn't change a thing - in fact, he's probably more capable to change the basic structure than any outsider, especially after the Wii U failure.The best thing Nintendo could do at E3 is have Iwata on stage announcing his resignation and introducing some forward-thinking, innovative and renowned leader from the gaming/tech industry as the company's new President.
You've never seen an E3 press conference have you?
The best thing Nintendo could do at E3 is have Iwata on stage announcing his resignation and introducing some forward-thinking, innovative and renowned leader from the gaming/tech industry as the company's new President. This would be far more exciting than any individual game announcement they could possibly make at this point and much more effective at restoring my faith in the company.
And whatever they do needs to be ON the trade show's floors. Nintendo Direct is awkward and embarrassing.
I'm gonna be so sad if Majora's Mask 3D isn't a thing.
It's not, sorry.
Because it's Majora's Mask HD
Seen numerous. I'll even take Nintendo in '08 over another one of these. There's something far worse, depressing and dreary about the Directs than any momentary oddness or goofy announcers from the past. It's like they've resigned themselves to last place loser status at an outside corner, babbling at anyone who will listen, instead of being in the party with all the big players.
So basically talking about games makes you a loser?
This is basically what I get from everyone that bitches about Nintendo not doing a stage presentation.
They'd rather see pseudo celebrities dancing for 10 minutes or pretending to play Football like Microsoft and Sony do.
At the same time most of the truly big players have moved away from large tradeshows. Apple, Google and Amazon don't rub elbows with the plebs at CES or E3. It makes sense financially too, why spend a boatload of money to share the pie with several other people? Why not spend that same money and have a show to yourself? Even Nintendo understands it's at this point more of a ritual than a necessity and when the ritual is not performed the natives get restless. So they will go but I think they're perhaps more interested in other things. Especially with QoL stuff it perhaps makes more sense to have their own little presser sometime in October tied to an ND.
I agree, but Nintendo should revive SpaceWorld or create a similar annual press event for that. They way they're currently doing things isn't working out terribly well for them.
People seem to still hold E3 in high regard. After the past few years they have absolutely no reason to. It's an extended commercials with some game trailers thrown in. I would just like someone to explain to me why it matters so much that Nintendo attend.
The Wii U is clearly in trouble but wii u owners are excited about upcoming games coming to their system like Smash Bros, Bayo 2, Mario Kart, X, SMTxFE, etc.
People seem to still hold E3 in high regard. After the past few years they have absolutely no reason to. It's an extended commercials with some game trailers thrown in. I would just like someone to explain to me why it matters so much that Nintendo attend.
People seem to still hold E3 in high regard. After the past few years they have absolutely no reason to. It's an extended commercials with some game trailers thrown in. I would just like someone to explain to me why it matters so much that Nintendo attend.
This is basically what I get from everyone that bitches about Nintendo not doing a stage presentation.
They'd rather see pseudo celebrities dancing for 10 minutes or pretending to play Football like Microsoft and Sony do.
But everyone remember the biggest moment of E3 2013, Sony fires shots at MS over DRM. Huge applause. We applauded the maintaining of the status quo, a complete non-announcement (for Nintendo anyway), a game console that plays used games, amazing! But a well paced video showing new games, pfft, I want Media Molecule modeling vaporware dicks.
A shark was jumped last year.
But everyone remembers the biggest moment of E3 2013, Sony fires shots at MS over DRM. Huge applause. We applauded the maintaining of the status quo, a complete non-announcement (for Nintendo anyway), a game console that plays used games, amazing! But a well paced video showing new games, pfft, I want Media Molecule modeling vaporware dicks.
A shark was jumped last year. It was not about software at all.
Hell, why should Nintendo hype their games up at all? What's the point of Nintendo Directs or trailers since they're just extended commercials for their games anyways? They should just release their games without trying to get people excited for them or get people outside of enthusiasts to learn about them, they would save more money that way.
I think there's a misunderstanding here. Your post sounded like they wouldn't do a show because they couldn't afford it, I think they won't do it because they don't think it's worth it. And they're probably right.1. Money is always an issue. And no, im not implying Nintendo doesn't have the funds to expend a couple of mills on the show. But since even the presient got a pay cut, then keep up with the example by cutting this unnecessary expense.
2. Related to the above. Not all companies invest equally in the event. Nintendo rents quite a big area ($), needs to accomodate more visitors than maybe 90% of the other companies ($) and also do a lot of specific asset stuff like montages, sets, statues, etc. ($).
3. Yea, a lot of now bankrupt comapnies attended the show and that didn't help their fortunes.
4. Related to the above, having a good E3 or "wining" E3 means nothing. Just ask 2 times back to back champion Sega.
5. Lot's of promising stuff gets lost in the sea of over saturation of information. Is just a contest of who holds their blow the longest to suddenly burst into a gigantic orgasm. Except is in an orgy when everyone else is doing the same thing.
6. Lot's of over worked dev teams to have the stupid E3 demo ready.
7. The true winners are the parasitic side of the industry. Not devs or gamers. Even gamers could benefit for having a more even spread of unveilings through out the yaer.
And like i said, is not like there's a real benefit of the big exposure you get at the show. Wii U been at every E3 since 2011 hasn't influenced the console in a positive or negative way. Or whatever it doesn't matter.
Now go ahead and list the vast amount of positives for attending the show my friend.
Yeah, well, Iwata even said that Nintendo hardware would look quite different if it was his call. And that was years ago. He was already president at the time, which means it wasn't his call even though he was president of the company. And that, to me, means the board had way too much influence and held him back. The foundation of NERD, the fact that the team in Seattle is apparently developing their future hardware, him becoming CEO of NoA - I'm pretty sure he would have taken all those steps long ago, but he couldn't. Because the board didn't play along. But now that the Wii U failed, the 3DS struggles, and with the QoL thing on the table, he might finally have the leeway and trust (internally) to do what's necessary.Yes, Iwata is that guy. Nintendo is just some adjustments away of greatness and that starts with them been less "cheap" and more long term thinking.
But i agree, Iwata is probably the CEO with the best understanding of gaming in the entire world.
Only press and enthusiasts watch E3. It's not like it's the Grammy's or whatever people seem to think. Nintendo Directs ALWAYS trend on social media and related articles make the rounds online.
This angered me so much. Sony "won" E3 because they didn't try to fuck people over like Microsoft. Good for them, I suppose?
Oh, Nintendo showed a bunch of new trailers that looked awesome? BOO! IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON A WOODEN STAGE! THEN WE WOULD CARE!
The faq. My friends and family, hell my friggin' grandparent, know what E3 is, and always mention when a new console is announced. Even news outlets are quick to have E3 wrap-ups. I don't know one person who talks about Nintendo Directs or are literally hyped with their Cranky Kong sticks.Only press and enthusiasts watch E3. It's not like it's the Grammy's or whatever people seem to think. Nintendo Directs ALWAYS trend on social media and related articles make the rounds online.
But everyone remembers the biggest moment of E3 2013, Sony fires shots at MS over DRM. Huge applause. We applauded the maintaining of the status quo, a complete non-announcement (for Nintendo anyway), a game console that plays used games, amazing! But a well paced video showing new games, pfft, I want Media Molecule modeling vaporware dicks.
A shark was jumped last year. It was not about software at all.
You are delusional if you think people pay more attention to Nintendo Directs than they do E3.
Stop using your name in the third person!!!
I feel like sometimes this is the prevailing narrative:
If Nintendo does or doesn't do X, they're terrible and Nintendo is doomed.
If anyone else does or doesn't do X, they're amazing and it's understandable.
The info gets passed around the internet regardless, so if the same goal is achieved then why is E3 necessary?
Or maybe, just maybe, people arr honestly concerned about Nintendo's well being as fans of Nintendo? Every little negative thing they do only hurts them worse. Sony shouldn't be receiving worry for not being at PAX East because they'll do fine and they're so relevant that it isn't needed. Nintendo,who's nearly the lowest in sales despite being launched a year early, needs every little press they can get so they can get back their market share and offer more quality systems/games as a result. There is persecution or narrative, they're just things Nintendo needs to do so they can achieve that same success.I feel like sometimes this is the prevailing narrative:
If Nintendo does or doesn't do X, they're terrible and Nintendo is doomed.
If anyone else does or doesn't do X, they're amazing and it's understandable.