If those events would actually save the brackets (I know there are a bunch that do, there are still a lot that don't) then I think the potential to surprize people would be much higher. =)and you know which ones I'm referring to
No doubt about that. Its just always interesting to me. Take CEO/UFGT as an example. CEO, due to spectacle and presentation, is viewed as massively larger than UFGT. Yet, when you strictly look at competitor totals, the difference is really only like 100 people.
Same conundrum happens seeing the Big E events as majors and ECT as a regional, when (and I could be wrong) the overall attendance is about the same (and I think ECT had better stream numbers last year didn't it?).
Its easy to place this on presentation value to the viewer, or location value in terms of known players, but from a strictly "I'm a good player because I win a tournament with X number of entrants" stand-point many of our regionals/majors/etc are the same.