Vice: "The Matrix is Dated and Embarrasing."

Status
Not open for further replies.
So i can see a clear difference here

Most people still love the original The Matrix

Most people already forgot about/dont care about Avatar

(in my head this comparsion somehow was interesting)
 
the-matrix-neo.jpg


No.
 
For the record I never cared for it. It really was 'cyberpunk-lite' with a heavy emphasis of style over substance. I never did bother to watch the sequels.
 
I know I'm in the minority but I always thought it was a profoundly overrated film (and for reference I was 18 when it came out). It was about that time when I first started to notice plot cliches and tropes and The Matrix was filled with them in rather predictable ways. For example I just knew somehow that the Oracle was an older black woman. Really though it was the pseudo intellectualism that turned me off from it. Finally bullet time is really stupid.

That's not to say I didn't enjoy watching it - it was very enjoyable - I just don't think it's this great work a lot of others do.
 
http://youtu.be/71DIStv4MPA

20 Buckle Minimum.

Matrix is still good I think. The second movie is still my favourite. Maybe not as much of an impact as the first but the action and chase scenes are so good. The third movie is just garbage though. All the neo vs. smith fights are stupid and the ugly ass mecha inside Zion are just as bad.
 
That entire article just reads like a typical "your favorite thing sucks and here are my flimsy and subjective reasons why" schlock fest.

The entire concept of dated vs. product of it's time is completely lost on him.
 
I tried to watch this with my wife last year. She couldn't get past the corny dialog and demanded we stop watching.

The movie is cheesy though. It's part of it's charm. The Matrix came out when I was about 17, and even at that young an age I realized that it wasn't trying to be some uber serious film for the ages.

I feel like the people that approach it as this mega serious flick will likely be turned off, it's not meant to be taken nearly as seriously as some did.
 
Blade Runner isn't even all that good, so these guys have lost it. They also don't seem to understand scifi or cyberpunk, at all, so it's embarrassing of them to post this. Matrix might have more relevance now than it did in 1999, tbh, regarding the relationship between the government and its people, and the decayed state of people's freedoms in society.

It's still one of the best cyberpunk films and easily beats Blade Runner (as do quite a few others) imho.....

.....altho Blade Runner is nice and all...

ADDENDUM: Wonder how these guys would feel about Fight Club, then. It's practically Matrix minus the hacking, Andersons (Tyler is an Anderson in a way tho), and many of the scifi elements, but still provides a lot of the same meta-commentary on a dystopian society. Which, again, is more relevant now than it was back then when you factor the political and socio-economical factors in today's society (let alone the "terrorism" agenda).
 
So, ex-wife?

LOL, no. She is great.

The movie is cheesy though. It's part of it's charm. The Matrix came out when I was about 17, and even at that young an age I realized that it wasn't trying to be some uber serious film for the ages.

I feel like the people that approach it as this mega serious flick will likely be turned off, it's not meant to be taken nearly as seriously as some did.

I've always known it wasn't supposed to be taken too seriously. But she just couldn't get into it for some reason. One day we'll try again, and not watch the sequels...
 
I seem to remember there was a brief period when Kid Rock, Limp Bizkit, and Linkin Park were all pretty much universally liked.
Hell I still like some of Linkin Park. I think the bigger source of embarrassment for people is not the music but how they participated in the culture around those bands and realized they looked like tools.

Vice is crazy, this is clickbait. Matrix holds up pretty well and it's central conceit means that even it's anachronisms won't feel as bad in the future (although I imagine the next generation to watch it will have a different experience since it's not describing 'our world' in the Matrix.)
 
Yeah but CG is supposed to age. It always does, allllways. Thats not a good reason to knock the first Matrix. Its a little campy to watch a 90's movie in 2014, but its still a solid movie.
Just because time moves on doesn't mean everything new is better.

And I'm an optimist/non-nostalgic.
 
As you grow older and look back on them all movies seem embarrassing.

Sure, if you grew up on Billy Madison and Wayne's World. But good movies tend to not really age poorly. The matrix was a so-so movie even when it came out and that certainly doesn't help its case.

Just look at other movies that are still well regarded that came out the same year: Fight Club, Toy Story 2, Being John Malkovich, The Iron Giant, Boys Don't Cry, The Insider, Election, etc.

The matrix doesn't hold up as well because it's really not a great movie. It's an ok scifi fantasy movie that came out during a time where the only other film that was even remotely similar was Episode 1.
 
Sure there are some easy targets in the Matrix, but I think it holds up. I still watch it regularly, though I've been a fan since it was released so I'm obviously biased.

The real cringe-worthy techno-garbage is more prominent in the sequels.
 
Great movie, i watched it last year and that mobile phone is dated as shit now. i remember it looked so cool back then, everyone wanted one.. and i remember taking a bunch of mushrooms before going to the cinema to watch it.. ah, to be young, dumb and full of psilocybin, good times.
matrix-phone.jpg

Why do people get hung up on the phone thing? isn't The Matrix is set in 1999? the software that is.
 
Great movie, i watched it last year and that mobile phone is dated as shit now. i remember it looked so cool back then, everyone wanted one.. and i remember taking a bunch of mushrooms before going to the cinema to watch it.. ah, to be young, dumb and full of psilocybin, good times.
matrix-phone.jpg

The phone is obviously super dated, but I would argue it's still cool. Imagine the same scene, but he instead takes out an iPhone and slides on the screen to answer. That would be terribly lame IMO.

Anyhow I've never seen an article be more wrong. The Matrix is top tier even today.
 
By dated I was expecting things like how on the blu-ray you can see the imperfections in the effects like being able to make out the roof of the warehouse a certain scene was filmed in (don't recall specifics).
 
Ghost in the Shell does NOT hold up...

Why not?

As for the Matrix, the concept is as interesting today as it was then I think. Only the first movies manages to stay somewhat focused however. There's still so much you can do with those sort of themes, so it is by no means a closed book.
 
The Fifth Element, Judge Dredd, Dark City, The Crow, and just about every pre-Matrix comic book/sci-fi/fantasy movie from 1982 onward is a pale copy of Blade Runner's rainy, industrialized aesthetic nightmare. Blade Runner and Star Wars couldn't be any different in look, theme, pace, or tone. And yet the Wachowski siblings got them both drunk, made them screw, and nine months (or 20 years) later, they had a baby called The Matrix—a dark, ominous, rainy, bleak Christ allegory about the battle between good and evil. The only thing that truly separates The Matrix from its forebears is a bunch of annoying songs by horrible bands and bullet time. Imagine putting a Donna Summer song into the cantina scene in Star Wars.

aOnUqlP.gif

s1UejNW.gif
 
What's truly sad about this article is that the guy who wrote it gets paid for it. I've seen better and more convincing arguments against pop culture on GAF for goodness and the person on GAF is writing it for free.
 
It actually seemed a lot more palatable to me when I saw it for the first time a couple years ago than it did when it came out. I guess it seemed to try-hard to me at the time, but I liked it a lot in 2011 or so. Maybe because enough time had passed that it kinda made the very 'cool' parts seem more abstract.
 
The funny part about the Matrix being "cheesy" and "pseudo intellectual" is I seem to recall an interview with the Wachowskis back then. They basically said on one hand you have super-serious philosophical films that are supposed to be prestigious and dignified. And on the other you have mindless action and adventure films that believe the viewer doesn't want to think about anything. Why can't you combine the two? Take some of the piss out of intellectual movies, and smarten up action movies with something a little intellectual.

The style of the Matrix, even its sequels, is to have all the characters be po-faced as they stand and look overly stylish and perfectly posed, spouting intentionally convoluted monologues that have tongue planted in cheek. (With a healthy side of deadpan humor.) But they're not entirely without a point, as there is a sincere thought or two underneath.

Really it's the same formula they used with Speed Racer except in that film it was blazingly obvious which parts where purely for fun and which parts were serious character moments.
 
Some of the effects in the movie are somewhat dated but that's to be expected.

I still think the whole trilogy is great though.




It's weird that to this day the effects still hold up to me. Especially the camera effects.


Then again I'm a sucker for simplistic effects rather than cgi.
 
It's weird that to this day the effects still hold up to me. Especially the camera effects.


Then again I'm a sucker for simplistic effects rather than cgi.

A lot of it still looks good, but some of it definitely looks bad. The green screen when trinity is jumping across buildings at the beginning looks horrible.
 
A lot of it still looks good, but some of it definitely looks bad. The green screen when trinity is jumping across buildings at the beginning looks horrible.

The first time i noticed this was this year, when someone at GAF pointed out.

I watched this movie one billion times, never noticed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom