No, but he knew what he was doing. He was taking retribution, which in this case was a completely evil act.The real world doesn't work in terms of good and evil.
No, but he knew what he was doing. He was taking retribution, which in this case was a completely evil act.The real world doesn't work in terms of good and evil.
I agree. Everyone who calls him "evil" and a "monster" and dehumanizes him really just ensures that this stigma persists. His manifesto shows that he wasn't born as the devil, he was a kid like any other. Some weird chain of events that may or may not have been preventable led to a normal happy child changing into what he was at the end.
At the end of the day he was someone's son, grandson and brother too. People who now realize that they failed in trying to help him. His death brought suffering to his own family too, and probably guilt for the rest of their lives. Admitting that doesn't mean that we are making light of the suffering of the victims' families.
The real world doesn't work in terms of good and evil.
There are plenty of people in this world who suffer horrific childhoods and are in a far worse state than this POS, who don't snap and commit murder.
This piece of shit used his shitty upbringing as an excuse to murder people. He deserves to be made fun of.
There are plenty of people in this world who suffer horrific childhoods and are in a far worse state than this POS, who don't snap and commit murder.
This piece of shit used his shitty upbringing as an excuse to murder people. He deserves to be made fun of.
He was getting help.He deserved and needed help. This was preventable.
Stigma for mental illness is never going to go away with an attitude like that, man.
Someone mentioned chris chan earlier, I think that is extremely apt. I did not read very much of that terrible manifesto but every sentence made me think of chris chan.
No, but he knew what he was doing. He was taking retribution, which in this case was a completely evil act.
There are plenty of people in this world who suffer horrific childhoods and are in a far worse state than this POS, who don't snap and commit murder.
This piece of shit used his shitty upbringing as an excuse to murder people. He deserves to be made fun of.
wtf. sexist bullshit didn't lead to these people dying, an absolute lunatic asshole snapped and used one of the readily available guns in america to murder all his peers.
And working on your 'game' can also just refer to getting better at meeting girls without controlling or manipulating them.
I agree mostly. But the flip side is saying he didn't understand what he was doing and it is societies or the parents fault for failing him. I don't think that's true either.Of course he "knew what he was doing" - as far as someone who is mentally ill is able to. In his twisted mind that was the right thing. What does that really mean though? A lot of people who commit crimes think they're doing the right thing.
By calling him "evil" and a "monster" people are not only giving him exactly the sort of legacy he wanted but also oversimplifying the cause of his actions.
"Piece of shit" is exactly what he thought about humanity too.
It sure is nice to know if I ever went on a killing rampage, millions of people would remember me, talk about me and I'd be all over the news ...
/sarcasm
Funny, that's what I think of the vast majority of humanity as well. But guess what, I don't go out and kill them.
Multiple witnesses say they saw two people inside the suspect's vehicle,
One woman identified as Sierra told Sanchez she was approached by two men in a black BMW. The driver flashed a small black handgun and asked '"Hey, what's up?"'
I thought it was one guy?
A few key differences:
Resources: Chris-chan has none, this kid has all of them.
Intelligence (not wisdom, intelligence): Chris-chan wouldn't have been able to pull this off if he tried. He's just too stupid.
General outlook on life: As pathetic as Chris-chan is, he seems to still have hope that things will turn around for him, and seems to believe there are people who find him very important (ironically, some people do). This kid seems to have had a complete downer outlook on life and felt the only way he could make himself important was to slaughter people.
The unabomber's manifesto is fascinating. This guys is just sad and pretty typical of someone with his views/problems. Plus people like this lie, I don't think there's much value in his 'manifesto'.
Anyone with $5,000 in the bank and isn't working has no fucking right to complain about not being rich. Not to mention the cars, housing, college and everything else for this doofus being paid for.
I think one of the largest contributers to this horrible story is that society puts far too much value on sex itself. People, especially young people see sex and some sort of goal that must be achieved and anyone who doesn't have it is either a complete failure, a creep or some kind of weirdo who just chooses not to believe that sex is as important as people make it out to be.
This guy was a headcase not because he didn't hax sex, he most likely would've ended up doing the same thing but for a different reason. I don't think it's the cause at all. Usually people who do this sort of thing find something to anger them and latch on to it to try and give justification for the senseless act they commit with their murder/suicide since he knew full well that he was either going tob be gunned down by armed police or kill himself
Meh. I think western society has a weird doublethink about it, trying to constantly pretend sex is this bad thing to be hidden away gives it this value. But sex has a lot of value in a way because if you're a teenage boy you'll gnaw off your own arm for it. Not because of society but because of biology. If you want to go all free market about it, the only way to reduce the "value" of sex is to increase the supply, massively, and to make distribution of it easier and quicker, and to remove the concentrations of power and lack thereof where they exist.
Well, of course he is going to have fucking asperger. God dammit! I don't need more of this shit (I have asperger).
I think one of the largest contributers to this horrible story is that society puts far too much value on sex itself. People, especially young people see sex and some sort of goal that must be achieved and anyone who doesn't have it is either a complete failure, a creep or some kind of weirdo who just chooses not to believe that sex is as important as people make it out to be.
puritan societies. In most parts of Europe sex is a healthy, beautiful thing.
I'm European. But I think while there are different nuances to it, it's hardly a solved problem here either.
It sure is nice to know if I ever went on a killing rampage, millions of people would remember me, talk about me and I'd be all over the news ...
/sarcasm
(yes I have a problem with people giving this dumbass so much attention, let them be forgotten immediately, talk about the victims about how they touched other peoples lives ... not the dumbass that killed them)
Let me tell you a story. The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. “Wouldn’t you say,” she asked, “that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?” No, I said, I wouldn’t say that. “But what about ‘Basketball Diaries’?” she asked. “Doesn’t that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?” The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it’s unlikely the Columbine killers saw it.
The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory. “Events like this,” I said, “if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn’t have messed with me. I’ll go out in a blaze of glory.”
In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of “explaining” them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy.
The parents seemed to just want him out of the way, not to deal with what was happening.
I think one of the largest contributers to this horrible story is that society puts far too much value on sex itself. People, especially young people see sex and some sort of goal that must be achieved and anyone who doesn't have it is either a complete failure, a creep or some kind of weirdo who just chooses not to believe that sex is as important as people make it out to be.
This guy was a headcase not because he didn't hax sex, he most likely would've ended up doing the same thing but for a different reason. I don't think it's the cause at all. Usually people who do this sort of thing find something to anger them and latch on to it to try and give justification for the senseless act they commit with their murder/suicide since he knew full well that he was either going tob be gunned down by armed police or kill himself.
If you look at Anders, he actively said he was expecting to be killed at the end of it so he said his goodbyes and whatever before he went out to start his killing spree. I realise it's a different situation but both of them had agendas fueled by society and both ended up doing similar things.
Now it's different with Anders, but this guy had easy access to guns and seemingly although his parents reported his strange behaviour nothing was done about it, so the blame lies entirely within both America's police and the American governments complete lack of regard for human life by allowing people to go out and buy guns legally.
If you read some of his quotes he was motivated by how much attention he would receive. The part where he's dead didn't really matter. The media glorifies these events and talks about them for weeks on end, just creating more potential killers.
Roger Ebert had this to say awhile back:
Dr. Park Dietz also agrees
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303309504579181702252120052
There will be a long list of things blamed before it gets back to the real first line of defense: good parenting.
I agree with first part, I'm a little conflicted on the last part.
While easy access to firearms contributed to the method of his madness, I don't think the blame can rest solely on that because the killers own complete disregard for human life would have had him finding other ways to do exactly what he did.
I don't think we're there yet. What it does show is that there are people so insensitive to things like this that they're willing to waste their time, create a fake persona, and make stupid comments for no constructive reason. For all we know they could be from immature middle school kids.
I want to tell myself that most of those youtube comments are trolling, but one of them could be a psychopath in waiting. It's a surreal thing seeing all those losers making this ass-hat out to be some sort of beta superhero.
Can't believe I read his entire manifesto.
This delusional spoiled brat has the most self-entitled view of himself. He looks down upon those in 'economy' class while on planes, looks down on 'nerdy types' and those who have sex with 'ugly women.'
The most disgusting vile person if I ever seen one. I'm glad he's dead.
His character kinda reminds me of not only Patrick Bateman of American Psycho but also 'The Talented Mr. Ripley' character.
It's always someone else's fault for his plights, someone is always doing something wrong to him. What a deluded pos. It looks as though his family did as much as they could during his upbringing to give him a comfortable and emotionally stable life. Setting up playdates, having him being involved in family functions. The kid was just self-absorbed and didn't like the fact that he could 'easily acquire' a woman. He treats women as objects. No wonder why people got bad vibes from him.
This kid was not mentally disturbed in my book. He was a highly functioning person who was just plain evil. I guarantee you that the kid's family are probably relieved he is dead, but not relieved that he killed so many people, something that will haunt them for the rest of their lives.
There will be a long list of things blamed before it gets back to the real first line of defense: good parenting.
It's creepy how much this Roger Elliot guy tires to channel his inner 'Light Yagami'{If light was a complete fucking idiot} villain. I'm pretty sure he was aware of his campy monologue as he made his final video. I can only hope the families affected by this tragedy can find peace and get better soon.
It seems like his parents did try to get him psychiatric help throughout his life. They seemed at a loss as to how to help him and eventually just kind of seemed to give up and avoid him. His step-mother definitely seems like she could have been part of the problem. At one point she tells him his younger brother will be a success before him and lose his virginity before him. That was the main reason he decided to kill his brother despite the fact he actually seemed to like his younger brother. Not the kind of thing you should be telling an already mentally disturbed young man.
Also, being raised in an affluent environment really seemed to warp his sense of values. Definitely a contributing factor.
It seems like his parents did try to get him psychiatric help throughout his life. They seemed at a loss as to how to help him and eventually just kind of seemed to give up and avoid him. His step-mother definitely seems like she could have been part of the problem. At one point she tells him his younger brother will be a success before him and lose his virginity before him. That was the main reason he decided to kill his brother despite the fact he actually seemed to like his younger brother. Not the kind of thing you should be telling an already mentally disturbed young man.
Also, being raised in an affluent environment really seemed to warp his sense of values. Definitely a contributing factor.
If you read some of his quotes he was motivated by how much attention he would receive. The part where he's dead didn't really matter. The media glorifies these events and talks about them for weeks on end, just creating more potential killers.
Roger Ebert had this to say awhile back:
Was that her own son as in his step brother?
Please don't take the deranged ramblings of a madman as fact. That almost 100% never happened, she probably just made some offhand comment complimenting the younger brother and he took it as an insult directed at him like he apparently took most things.
Let me tell you a story. The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. Wouldnt you say, she asked, that killings like this are influenced by violent movies? No, I said, I wouldnt say that. But what about Basketball Diaries? she asked. Doesnt that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun? The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and its unlikely the Columbine killers saw it.
The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory. Events like this, I said, if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldnt have messed with me. Ill go out in a blaze of glory.
In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of explaining them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy.
I'm not going to deny that looking through his rambling or crazy videos is interesting but ultimately I think it is possibly quite dangerous to make such a big deal of it. Obviously he's not going to be hurting anyone else now, but what do you think the next attention starved narcissist who sees this guys videos being watched by thousands of people and his "manifesto" being pored over is going to think? This is the same story we've seen over and over again, and it always plays out exactly the same because the killers always get what they want.
News coverage of these events should focus on the victims, not the murderers. Hours of coverage on CNN and even huge forum threads discussing their motives are likely what inspired these people to do what they did. Preferably they wouldn't even name the killers in the coverage.
He was mentally ill and that made him murder people, that's all the remembrance he needs or deserves.