• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

IGN: The Last Guardian cancelled, mayhaps; Sony: Nope - Stage XI: Mole Hunt

Who should be banned from NeoGAF?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
There it is. That's the look. We've seen it for seven years on post after post. You all despise us. Cynics. Disbelievers. Mods with an anti-Sony bias. You've heard of rumours? The forum was obsessed with them. They loved to watch gamers and press burn, the way their hopes blackened, blistered, melted off their words. They burned developers they didn't like; they burned publishers that disobeyed them; they burned anyone that was against them. Before long, half PR community was against them. NeoGAF saw traitors everywhere, so they had their posters place caches of rumours all over the forum: beneath gaming discussion, the slums of off topic, under posts, titles, avatars, even beneath the Community OT itself. Finally, the day of reckoning came. IGN marched upon the forum after the cancellation at the Team Ico. But Scott Rohde arrived first with the whole Sony army at his back, promising that The Last Guardian still existed. We knew Sony better than that. They've never been one to bank on development hell. We told NeoGAF as much. We urged them to move on. But the forum didn't listen to us, didn't listen to the mods who tried to warn them. But they did listen to Yosp, that grey sunken cunt. "You can trust Sony," he said. "Team Ico has always been developing The Last Guardian." So, we opened discussion and Rohde sacked the forum. Once again qw came to the forum begging them to see reality. They told us to bring them IGN's head. Then they turned to each other, "Ban them all," they said. "Ban them on our forum, ban them in their URLs." Tell us, if your precious community commanded you to ban a popular source of gaming coverage and stand by while thousands of men women and children anticipated a title stuck in development hell, would you have done it? Would you have kept your oath then? First, we changed the thread title, and then when the posters turned to flee we added a stupid poll. "Ban them all!," they kept saying. "Ban them all!" I don't think they expected it to be at E3. They meant to wait for as long as necessary with the rest of us and watch The Last Guardian rise again, reborn as a PlayStation 4 title. We kept the thread open to make sure that didn't happen.

Wut.
 
Maybe the reason IGN hasn't changed the headline is because they are so confident in their source or they think Rohde is lying. But it's probably just clicks.
 
bvsVrvX.gif
 
I reckon its still alive and they'll show it at the end of their press conference. It's the only way they can top last E3.
 
There it is. That's the look. We've seen it for seven years on post after post. You all despise us. Cynics. Disbelievers. Mods with an anti-Sony bias. You've heard of rumours? The forum was obsessed with them. They loved to watch gamers and press burn, the way their hopes blackened, blistered, melted off their words. They burned developers they didn't like; they burned publishers that disobeyed them; they burned anyone that was against them. Before long, half PR community was against them. NeoGAF saw traitors everywhere, so they had their posters place caches of rumours all over the forum: beneath gaming discussion, the slums of off topic, under posts, titles, avatars, even beneath the Community OT itself. Finally, the day of reckoning came. IGN marched upon the forum after the cancellation at the Team Ico. But Scott Rohde arrived first with the whole Sony army at his back, promising that The Last Guardian still existed. We knew Sony better than that. They've never been one to bank on development hell. We told NeoGAF as much. We urged them to move on. But the forum didn't listen to us, didn't listen to the mods who tried to warn them. But they did listen to Yosp, that grey sunken cunt. "You can trust Sony," he said. "Team Ico has always been developing The Last Guardian." So, we opened discussion and Rohde sacked the forum. Once again qw came to the forum begging them to see reality. They told us to bring them IGN's head. Then they turned to each other, "Ban them all," they said. "Ban them on our forum, ban them in their URLs." Tell us, if your precious community commanded you to ban a popular source of gaming coverage and stand by while thousands of men women and children anticipated a title stuck in development hell, would you have done it? Would you have kept your oath then? First, we changed the thread title, and then when the posters turned to flee we added a stupid poll. "Ban them all!," they kept saying. "Ban them all!" I don't think they expected it to be at E3. They meant to wait for as long as necessary with the rest of us and watch The Last Guardian rise again, reborn as a PlayStation 4 title. We kept the thread open to make sure that didn't happen.

hD3E903BD
 
IGN probably posted some bullshit just to force Sony to make some sort of statement because they figured we'd go another E3 hearing nothing about it. Now at least they've said SOMETHING about it, and we can continue this song and dance.
 
There it is. That's the look. We've seen it for seven years on post after post. You all despise us. Cynics. Disbelievers. Mods with an anti-Sony bias. You've heard of rumours? The forum was obsessed with them. They loved to watch gamers and press burn, the way their hopes blackened, blistered, melted off their words. They burned developers they didn't like; they burned publishers that disobeyed them; they burned anyone that was against them. Before long, half PR community was against them. NeoGAF saw traitors everywhere, so they had their posters place caches of rumours all over the forum: beneath gaming discussion, the slums of off topic, under posts, titles, avatars, even beneath the Community OT itself. Finally, the day of reckoning came. IGN marched upon the forum after the cancellation at the Team Ico. But Scott Rohde arrived first with the whole Sony army at his back, promising that The Last Guardian still existed. We knew Sony better than that. They've never been one to bank on development hell. We told NeoGAF as much. We urged them to move on. But the forum didn't listen to us, didn't listen to the mods who tried to warn them. But they did listen to Yosp, that grey sunken cunt. "You can trust Sony," he said. "Team Ico has always been developing The Last Guardian." So, we opened discussion and Rohde sacked the forum. Once again qw came to the forum begging them to see reality. They told us to bring them IGN's head. Then they turned to each other, "Ban them all," they said. "Ban them on our forum, ban them in their URLs." Tell us, if your precious community commanded you to ban a popular source of gaming coverage and stand by while thousands of men women and children anticipated a title stuck in development hell, would you have done it? Would you have kept your oath then? First, we changed the thread title, and then when the posters turned to flee we added a stupid poll. "Ban them all!," they kept saying. "Ban them all!" I don't think they expected it to be at E3. They meant to wait for as long as necessary with the rest of us and watch The Last Guardian rise again, reborn as a PlayStation 4 title. We kept the thread open to make sure that didn't happen.
This is too good.
This is too meta.
This is too meta that I'm even saying this is too meta.
Arrgghhh
j74SykU.gif

NJ by the way.
 
Hey guys, look at this.This is the updated version of the article:



In the original version, they said it was 'sources.' As in, multiple sources.

That's why I was already sceptical on page 8 or so, WHY on earth should someone approach IGN Russia out of all places.
That's major news material....that should have been fishy to begin with, looks like they've been fooled by someone special :)
 
I really hope this is Sony's way of finding who their leaker is haha. Like Tyrion in Game of Thrones. Shu walks up to the suspected leaker, tells him directly TLG has been cancelled, and waits to see what happens. Now that guy is fired and IGN gets shafted from future press events.
No reason to shaft IGN - they just reported what their source said.
 
I mean, let's run down the possibilities here:

1) It's true and Sony doesn't want to say anything yet, so they issued a denial.

2) It's not true but IGN was lead to believe it through usually credible sources that were themselves given wrong or incomplete information.

3) It's not true and IGN took very weak sources and ran with them irresponsibly.

The third one is a really, really heavy accusation and basically torpedoes them as a news source. It's possible, but would have had to be done damn near drunkenly for an editor to post it.

The second one seems the most likely to me. I don't really buy the "Sony was trying to root out leakers" theory, but I can easily see people just getting it wrong. If this is the case and IGN didn't knowingly put up a false story, they might be trying to find out where in the chain the information breakdown happened before they acknowledge it as false.
 
After waking up I'm thankful that I visited GAF first for my cup of coffee instead of the usual newspapers. It was tough to catch up to the pace, but boy was it worth it.

What a rollercoaster, and now I'm even fairly confident that we'll see something TLG related on monday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom