Kos Luftar
Member
Nope. They can lose and still qualify.so France is not in danger of elimination right?
Nope. They can lose and still qualify.so France is not in danger of elimination right?
Pulga?
so France is not in danger of elimination right?
What exactly are you trying to argue here?
they just don't care that much for this game
And it will be so glorious when they do. That is what goal-line tech has showed us; it works. No give as video evidence. Step after that is tracking all players and the ball, so every off-side will be a 100% correct call.
so France is not in danger of elimination right?
that happen in 11vs11 matches too. A 11vs10 moment would still give a team the upper hand if they are ambitious enough.
I'm talking about the match at hand. No real penalty for yellow except you can't be an asshole for the rest of the game. I dunno, questionable reds just have such an enormous impact on games.What... Having a yellow impacts the way you are able to play the rest of the match quite a bit... and if you collect enough yellows through several matches you will get a suspension anyway. Off for 10 minutes? Fuck no.
so France is not in danger of elimination right?
Not unless Ecuador scores 7 goals.
Eh WoodenLung said we shouldn't compare different tackles and I was arguing that of course you have to and that's what you do at referee courses to know how to punish different stuff.
I just translated that from the FIFA book, but okay, if you say so.Those are the rules in your book. Not the rules of the game. Sorry bud
Sorry forgot to add them, lol. But somebody already said it, always yellow, when you hit the opponent first (what I wrote about) and studs up/straight leg = red (going for the opponent, no chance at the ball)This says nothing about the cards.
France looks poor. Guess those first two games were flukes.
![]()
Um, no. Your posted rules say that the player should be lunging or challenging for the ball to be booked. The Ecuadorian player was trying to stop and avoid contact. The call was a bad call.
Eh WoodenLung said we shouldn't compare different tackles and I was arguing that of course you have to and that's what you do at referee courses to know how to punish different stuff.
Um, no. Your posted rules say that the player should be lunging or challenging for the ball to be booked. The Ecuadorian player was trying to stop and avoid contact. The call was a bad call.
and Switzerland a few more too.
Edit: actually, i don't think that's right.
Eh WoodenLung said we shouldn't compare different tackles and I was arguing that of course you have to and that's what you do at referee courses to know how to punish different stuff.
That match makes it too obvious.valbuena ties everything together
Oh dear. Are you Valencia?
lool
I don't remember his name. I don't care for the follies of mortal men.
How was he not lunging or challenging for the ball when he touched the ball, as everyone in the "THAT WASN'T A RED!" camp pointed out?
I am pretty certain what Wooden is saying is that comparing these two in particular is silly because it is more than likely that the Ref in the Uruguay match fucked up rather than that its not a red.
I'm talking about the match at hand. No real penalty for yellow except you can't be an asshole for the rest of the game. I dunno, questionable reds just have such an enormous impact on games.
Well maybe we misunderstood each other cause I meant we have to compare different kind of tackles in general, and he said no. that's what I was arguing, not the Caceres tackle in that case.
so France is not in danger of elimination right?
I just translated that from the FIFA book, but okay, if you say so.
Sorry forgot to add them, lol. But somebody already said it, always yellow, when you hit the opponent first (what I wrote about) and studs up/straight leg = red (going for the opponent, no chance at the ball)
Arroyo is pissed.