Zombie James
Banned
![]()
So conspiracy theorists say he is actually trying to bite Gerrard here.
This is just getting creepy now.
![]()
So conspiracy theorists say he is actually trying to bite Gerrard here.
Should have been 6 months.
So what you are saying is that finally the FIFA did something the right way. Gotcha.Nah mate, should've been 6 months and 3 weeks and 5 days and 4 hrs and 36 minutes and 4 seconds. Get some perspective. People have gotten less for punching referees.
People have gotten less for punching referees.
Nah mate, should've been 6 months and 3 weeks and 5 days and 4 hrs and 36 minutes and 4 seconds. Get some perspective. People have gotten less for punching referees.
This is just getting creepy now.
I love all the people saying how Ghana got a penalty so him stopping the ball with his hand is O.K or some shit.
He stopped a 100% goal by cheating, that's the end of story. Irrelevant whether Ghana got a penalty or not.
lol at anyone defending this scumbag. He's a disgrace and should have been permabanned.
What a shithead.
B-but the world is full of rapists and hungry kids from africa with cancer, FIfa should be focusing on that!
No need for that, plenty of people seem to think the punishment was too harsh, including the person that was bitten.
3 times?Nah mate, should've been 6 months and 3 weeks and 5 days and 4 hrs and 36 minutes and 4 seconds. Get some perspective. People have gotten less for punching referees.
No need for that, plenty of people seem to think the punishment was too harsh, including the person that was bitten.
They are also banned from football, AFAIK.B-but the world is full of rapists and hungry kids from africa with cancer, FIfa should be focusing on that!
I don't care about football at all, but looking at this from the outside I just have no clue why this person hasn't been permanently banned from participating in the official sport. Like, he's physically assaulting other players, how is that ok in a sport that has literally nothing to do with violence?
I don't care about football at all, but looking at this from the outside I just have no clue why this person hasn't been permanently banned from participating in the official sport. Like, he's physically assaulting other players, how is that ok in a sport that has literally nothing to do with violence?
lol 99.9% of all the football players in the world would do what Suarez did against Ghana and it wasn't cheating, smh.
Yup, thread needs to disappear already.
Leave Suarez alone!
No not really, things are ok till the burn him alive crowd shows up.
![]()
So conspiracy theorists say he is actually trying to bite Gerrard here.
Liverpool fan.Yup, thread needs to disappear already.
Regarding the handball rule. It's just a symptom of a deficient rule. When an obvious goal is prevented illegally like that, it should count. Just like a goaltending in the NBA.
That takes out the incentive to be a dumbass and actually fully punishes the team committing the infraction. Being able to prevent the goal with the only result of forcing the attacking team to have to attempt another one kind of stacks things in favor of the defenders. It would be like the NBA forcing the offense to take free throws due to the defense committing a goaltending infraction.
If done early enough maybe. At the end? It makes little difference with the numbers.it really doesn't. this was an extremely rare case (i am not aware of anything similar happening before or since). in pretty much all cases red + penalty massively stacks the play in favour of the attackers.
Liverpool fan.
Out of curiosity, how is this not treated as assault?
If done early enough maybe. At the end? It makes little difference with the numbers.
I'm even ok with a goal awarded + yellow. Much more incentive to not commit the foul.
Yep. Yep. Yep.In any normal job, if you bite a coworker, you get fired and charged with assault. It boggles my mind that athletes are able to get away with garbage like this and come away with a slap on the wrist.
This makes a lot of sense, which is exactly why it will never be implemented.
From what I've seen in this sport, goals are hard to come by and when spectators come to the matches they also want to be a part of every goal. Spectators are a huge part of the game, and when they can't physically see a goal I think that takes something away from the sport. That's where I think FIFA are different from the American leagues, they favour excitement and controversy over fairness.
Must be.I wish this was fake:
![]()
Must be.
The bite is ridiculous, and I have no issues with the ban lenght by itself, I do have issues when comparing it with other aggression which are, in my eyes, worst.
I honestly find a (purposely) elbowing to the face worst than a bite, it's a lot more dangerous than a bite to the shoulder, it's just happens to "normal" and less flashy.
And yeah, this is his third bite, but we also have cases of players who did aggression multiple times (Pepe comes to mind) who don't get bans this long for multiple aggression.
If we want to keep this type of behavior out of football, we need to have heavy bans to any kind of purposed physical aggression that might endanger the opponents, not short-mid bans to elbow to the face (or none at all such as Neymar hitting Modric in the face in the first WC game) and then heavy bans to the flashy, but less dangerous, ones.
Just in case there's any doubt, here's the BBC story on his statement: Luis Suarez bite: 'I lost my balance and fell on Chiellini'