Can we talk about the apparent iCloud break-in?

Status
Not open for further replies.
sNoAkfu.png

Hehe Piece of Shit. I like her sense of humor.
 
That analogy might work if I was taking part in the crime (as I would be if I paid a prostitute) of invading someone's privacy or spreading said content across the world. But I am not. I heard about the leaks. Spent about 2 minutes searching and finding enough to satisfy my curiosity.

The person who buys a stolen good is considered party to a crime even if they didn't ask to have it stolen. This is the same thing. You are party to a crime, whether you admit it or not. You've obviously chosen not to.

Am I supposed to feel bad about this? Is what I'm saying supposed to sound like I am making myself feel better somehow? It's pretty much a given that not ever pic on the internet is approved for national consumption. I do not hesitate when watching a vid and wonder if it was uploaded with the express written consent of all parties involved.

You're justifying your position, so yes, what you're saying is being said to make yourself feel like you've done nothing wrong, thus feel better about yourself. And yeah, you probably should.

I am simply indifferent to it. If I see something in a tabloid about some gossip involving someone I heard of, I might read it. If I overhear a conversation I wasn't meant to hear, I might hold my hand to my ear to listen clearly. If I hear of a photograph showing someone I've heard of, I might look at it. I am actually shocked at the notion that there are people out there that dont do the same thing, and even more shocked people would demonize this behavior!

Yeah, it's like I said... some people only give a shit about privacy when it's their own at stake (case in point: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=128039822&postcount=1143). You very clearly fall into that category. Unless you're going to somehow claim that you don't value your own privacy even slightly.

There is a huge difference between getting the scoop on what someone wrote in their diary and stealing the diary itself

If you wanted to read the diary and created the demand for someone to steal it, you see no part played by yourself in the activity, even passively?
 
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.

Not surprising, filing a lawsuit carries a VERY low bar these days. With that said, that ToS is pretty airtight
 
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.

The amount of celebrities is irrelevant. You can file a lawsuit for just about anything and it can be dismissed immediately. That doesn't make any of this right but legally Apple is safe.
 

Fucking stellar.

I love just about every picture that came out, I've looked at most of them. I will say that none of these celebrities deserve this, it's not anyones fault, they're human just like the rest of us. If I ever become a person of importance in this world, I hope I'm not targeted like this.
 
The person who buys a stolen good is considered party to a crime even if they didn't ask to have it stolen. This is the same thing. You are party to a crime, whether you admit it or not. You've obviously chosen not to.

OK, you're going a little far with this....

This is in the arena of ethics; no actual criminal liability exists here.
 
First they'd have to prove the leak was from iCloud, then they'd have to get pass the TOS, then they'd have to fight Apple's paid to the grills lawyers. No chance imo. Everyone is just going to keep their heads down and hope it passes so they can get back to work.
 
I really don't understand how some people act shocked by comments they read on Reddit/Twitter/Youtube. The internet has been full of assholes since the beginning.
 
Apple is definitely determining how the photos were taken. Most likely at least one culprit will take the fall. Their only consequence I foresee is bad PR. I doubt they'll be paying any money to the victims, unless they sue Apple as a group.
 
OK, you're going a little far with this....

This is in the arena of ethics; no actual criminal liability exists here.

And? Where does it invalidate the concept that you are party to a crime, whether or not any criminal liability exists, or whether or not you consider it ethical? The facts remain regardless of either concern.
 
Pretty sure just about everyone is aware that bad things can happen.

Right, i'm not blaming them it's not their faults at all but my point is that they should be aware that these things can possibly happen. Don't really understand what you were saying with your example.
I read some of the comments on reddit. Never went on there before. All those people are fucking losers. What a cesspool.
Strange site in general and i hate the layout. But theres like little to no mods on a lot of sections on that site, i guess? So it's to be expected
 
They're really, really not. There will not be a single successful lawsuit out of this.

Damage to reputation could be the issue, though they are masters at managing how people see them. It's ironic given how much they like to bash Android and MS for security problems. They simply can't keep leaning on their marketing that everything is just perfectly secure and magical "because it's Apple."

Imagine if these people had targeted ALL iPhone users for this ...
 
And? Where does it invalidate the concept that you are party to a crime, whether or not any criminal liability exists, or whether or not you consider it ethical? The facts remain regardless of either concern.

Because if you are a party to a crime, criminal liability exists. Furthermore, the party to the crime is liable to the same extent as the perpetrator (the "hacker"). Looking up the pictures on Google does not make you a "party to a crime"

(Just so you know, in order to be a party to a crime, you have to intend for the crime to be committed as well as aid the perpetrator in committing the crime. Since neither is present here, it's an ethical issue, not a criminal one)
 
I guess I've been under a rock or something because I'm just hearing about this. Man, I feel bad for all the people that had their photos stolen. I know I'd feel pretty terrible if it were my photos taken.

Also, whether it makes sense or not, I'm guessing Apple's stock is going to take a beating and get shorted HARD in the short term. Savvy investors are probably gonna get paid.
 
They're really, really not. There will not be a single successful lawsuit out of this.

They very well could be. Not even in the legal sense.

All it takes is mindshare of the public and a loss of trust on a widespread scale of their products and services and it can make a huge deal.
 
I'd like to believe that Jlaw hasn't responded because she's thinking up a witty response of her own.
I doubt it. She's the "big one" in this case. Has to be tough. When people refer to these stolen pictures she'll come up naturally.

I don't think it will affect her in a box office/celebrity status manner, but it has to feel terrible.
 
The worst thing about this is having friends and family see.

Really messed up. The shame and embarrassment I would feel are crazy.
 
There's some pretty convincing evidence that these photos are from people collecting and trading them on image boards, so I dont think it was one major hack, just years of social engineering/hacking that some guy decided to make money off of
 
I'm sorry, were they released without your consent? To the entire world and are currently being talked about against your will?

Of course you wouldn't be worried about this considering your history of entitlement and self-centeredness. No shock there. Coughcreepcough

Oh boy, you called me a creep! Are you talking shit about me in a public forum against my will?

You're hypocritical without even realizing it.

I don't feel the slightest bit sorry for ANYONE that finds themselves in these situations. I don't bend my ethic to fit whatever agenda happens to be popular either. Consistency.
 
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.

Sure, but I don't think a lawsuit would get very far.

iCloud is an entirely optional service that requires opt-in, accepting the terms of service, and then manually enabling each feature. The victims in this case were fully aware their photos were being stored on the internet (albeit privately) and the risks that come with that.
 
Because if you are a party to a crime, criminal liability exists. Furthermore, the party to the crime is liable to the same extent as the perpetrator (the "hacker"). Looking up the pictures on Google does not make you a "party to a crime"

(Just so you know, in order to be a party to a crime, you have to intend for the crime to be committed as well as aid the perpetrator in committing the crime. Since neither is present here, it's an ethical issue, not a criminal)

No, what you're describing is an accessory to a crime. Being "party to a crime" is not an exclusively criminal term, as complicity is not considered criminal in most countries but still makes a person "party to a crime" by proxy. If you're going to discuss semantics, of course.

And you didn't address my question. Would you care to now that the semantics are cleared up?
 
Sure, but I don't think a lawsuit would get very far.

iCloud is an entirely optional service that requires opt-in, accepting the terms of service, and then manually enabling each feature. The victims in this case were fully aware their photos were being stored on the internet (albeit privately) and the risks that come with that.

Do you have to manually enable auto uploading ever pic to the cloud?
 
Sure, but I don't think a lawsuit would get very far.

iCloud is an entirely optional service that requires opt-in, accepting the terms of service, and then manually enabling each feature. The victims in this case were fully aware their photos were being stored on the internet (albeit privately) and the risks that come with that.

I think they would have cased based on the fact that Apple's security was unable to keep their private photos secure on the iCloud servers.

The basic concept of it doesn't seem that different than Sony's service getting hacked and credit cards being leaked. The content is different but there is a certain measure of security expected in both cases. In both cases that measure of security wasn't met.

I'm not sure how far it would go though. Where did Sony's situation end up? I swear I ended up with $10 or something out of a classic action lawsuit a couple of years ago. Or some free games.
 
I'd like to believe that Jlaw hasn't responded because she's thinking up a witty response of her own.

I'd like the response to be something genuine and hilarious but I imagine a team of PR people are crafting 140 character response right now.

To be honest she took the biggest blunt out of this. She is probably crying herself to sleep, while her sponsors keep calling to cancel their contracts. I mean, I hope not, but that's what I would probably do in my case.
 
To be honest she took the biggest blunt out of this. She is probably crying herself to sleep, while her sponsors keep calling to cancel their contracts. I mean, I hope not, but that's what I would probably do in my case.

It really depends on the person. She could just as likely be the type of person to blow this off and mock the people who want to see her naked. We don't really know her.

I thought MEW and Dunst's reactions were basically calling out the people looking at them as pathetic but they didn't seem to let it ruin their day.

You're right though. Jennifer Lawrence is certainly at the forefront of all this. She may see her comments as important.
 
Do you think anyone will learn from this experience and take their online privacy seriously?

I hope things like 2FA becomes the norm or even better would be big tech companies should force people to use it. They should see this as an opportunity to promote it at the very least.

The username/password paradigm is broken and needs to go away.
 
I think they would have cased based on the fact that Apple's security was unable to keep their private photos secure on the iCloud servers.

The basic concept of it doesn't seem that different than Sony's service getting hacked and credit cards being leaked. The content is different but there is a certain measure of security expected in both cases. In both cases that measure of security wasn't met.

I'm not sure how far it would go though. Where did Sony's situation end up? I swear I ended up with $10 or something out of a classic action lawsuit a couple of years ago. Or some free games.

Eh, this is different, these were targeted "hacks" that were probably done through a combination of social engineering and brute force. The former is definitely not Apple's fault and the latter is only sort of Apple's fault as a stronger password would have made it practically impossible.

As to victim blaming, it really comes down to this, if there is something you're ashamed of doing and don't want people to see, either don't do it or definitely don't take pictures of it and share them with others. That doesn't make the "theft" of these photos any less illegal, but there's an element of personally responsibility here that can't be ignored.
 
Oh boy, you called me a creep! Are you talking shit about me in a public forum against my will?

You're hypocritical without even realizing it.

I don't feel the slightest bit sorry for ANYONE that finds themselves in these situations. I don't bend my ethic to fit whatever agenda happens to be popular either. Consistency.

Telling you how screwed up your overall perspective is, is somehow on equal ground as a woman's pictures being spread about without permission and humiliating her?

Your ethics are concerning, and distorted.

If anything, this is the one opportunity where you should be focused on yourself. Because you really need some self reflection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom