Winterfang
Banned
Hehe Piece of Shit. I like her sense of humor.
That sounds like another shade of victim blaming.dunno if this has been posted yet
![]()
Apple said they're investigating the hack.If this turns out to be the case
http://thenextweb.com/apple/2014/09...aw-that-led-to-celebrity-photos-being-leaked/
then yes she will be getting not just penny but shit load of money.
The iCloud Terms of Service that must be accepted before using it state:
Damn.The iCloud Terms of Service that must be accepted before using it state:
That analogy might work if I was taking part in the crime (as I would be if I paid a prostitute) of invading someone's privacy or spreading said content across the world. But I am not. I heard about the leaks. Spent about 2 minutes searching and finding enough to satisfy my curiosity.
Am I supposed to feel bad about this? Is what I'm saying supposed to sound like I am making myself feel better somehow? It's pretty much a given that not ever pic on the internet is approved for national consumption. I do not hesitate when watching a vid and wonder if it was uploaded with the express written consent of all parties involved.
I am simply indifferent to it. If I see something in a tabloid about some gossip involving someone I heard of, I might read it. If I overhear a conversation I wasn't meant to hear, I might hold my hand to my ear to listen clearly. If I hear of a photograph showing someone I've heard of, I might look at it. I am actually shocked at the notion that there are people out there that dont do the same thing, and even more shocked people would demonize this behavior!
There is a huge difference between getting the scoop on what someone wrote in their diary and stealing the diary itself
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.The iCloud Terms of Service that must be accepted before using it state:
Jessica Brown Findley trying to smell some ass...
http://www.theverge.com/2014/9/1/6092769/creeps
Turns out people on twitter who blame the women for being hacked are also real mad at NSA spying
![]()
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.
The iCloud Terms of Service that must be accepted before using it state:
The person who buys a stolen good is considered party to a crime even if they didn't ask to have it stolen. This is the same thing. You are party to a crime, whether you admit it or not. You've obviously chosen not to.
OK, you're going a little far with this....
This is in the arena of ethics; no actual criminal liability exists here.
Pretty sure just about everyone is aware that bad things can happen.
Strange site in general and i hate the layout. But theres like little to no mods on a lot of sections on that site, i guess? So it's to be expectedI read some of the comments on reddit. Never went on there before. All those people are fucking losers. What a cesspool.
They're really, really not. There will not be a single successful lawsuit out of this.
And? Where does it invalidate the concept that you are party to a crime, whether or not any criminal liability exists, or whether or not you consider it ethical? The facts remain regardless of either concern.
Putting the onus on Apple is another form of victim blaming....Apple is definitely determining how the photos were taken. Most likely at least one culprit will take the fall. Their only consequence I foresee is bad PR. I doubt they'll be paying any money to the victims, unless they sue Apple as a group.
They're really, really not. There will not be a single successful lawsuit out of this.
I'd like to believe that Jlaw hasn't responded because she's thinking up a witty response of her own.
I doubt it. She's the "big one" in this case. Has to be tough. When people refer to these stolen pictures she'll come up naturally.I'd like to believe that Jlaw hasn't responded because she's thinking up a witty response of her own.
I'm sorry, were they released without your consent? To the entire world and are currently being talked about against your will?
Of course you wouldn't be worried about this considering your history of entitlement and self-centeredness. No shock there. Coughcreepcough
Despite the terms of service, a lawsuit can be filed against Apple. They aren't in the clear. Especially with the still growing number of celebrities involved.
Not what I think is right, just what I think will happen.Putting the onus on Apple is another form of victim blaming....
https://twitter.com/AnnaKendrick47/status/506291212752396289/photo/1Don't worry bro, it would just be photos of food and other people's dogs anyway.
Because if you are a party to a crime, criminal liability exists. Furthermore, the party to the crime is liable to the same extent as the perpetrator (the "hacker"). Looking up the pictures on Google does not make you a "party to a crime"
(Just so you know, in order to be a party to a crime, you have to intend for the crime to be committed as well as aid the perpetrator in committing the crime. Since neither is present here, it's an ethical issue, not a criminal)
Sure, but I don't think a lawsuit would get very far.
iCloud is an entirely optional service that requires opt-in, accepting the terms of service, and then manually enabling each feature. The victims in this case were fully aware their photos were being stored on the internet (albeit privately) and the risks that come with that.
Was just posting it as a joke.Not what I think is right, just what I think will happen.
Sure, but I don't think a lawsuit would get very far.
iCloud is an entirely optional service that requires opt-in, accepting the terms of service, and then manually enabling each feature. The victims in this case were fully aware their photos were being stored on the internet (albeit privately) and the risks that come with that.
I'd like to believe that Jlaw hasn't responded because she's thinking up a witty response of her own.
I'd like the response to be something genuine and hilarious but I imagine a team of PR people are crafting 140 character response right now.
Naw.
![]()
Someone else asked for nudes once. ONCE!
IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SzCGsQD.jpg[/IMG]
folks are being banned for asking for nudes/links
I'd like to believe that Jlaw hasn't responded because she's thinking up a witty response of her own.
To be honest she took the biggest blunt out of this. She is probably crying herself to sleep, while her sponsors keep calling to cancel their contracts. I mean, I hope not, but that's what I would probably do in my case.
I think they would have cased based on the fact that Apple's security was unable to keep their private photos secure on the iCloud servers.
The basic concept of it doesn't seem that different than Sony's service getting hacked and credit cards being leaked. The content is different but there is a certain measure of security expected in both cases. In both cases that measure of security wasn't met.
I'm not sure how far it would go though. Where did Sony's situation end up? I swear I ended up with $10 or something out of a classic action lawsuit a couple of years ago. Or some free games.
Oh boy, you called me a creep! Are you talking shit about me in a public forum against my will?
You're hypocritical without even realizing it.
I don't feel the slightest bit sorry for ANYONE that finds themselves in these situations. I don't bend my ethic to fit whatever agenda happens to be popular either. Consistency.