What about this is NSFW?
This is a joke right? Nobody actually believes that this is NSFW...right?
I open the thread and there's immediately a gif of a dude ogling a buxom animated Japanese school girl. I get that clever titles are a thing and that's hilarious, but I'd rather not have my coworkers think that I'm wanking to loli hentai in the middle of the day. When that guy icecream made threads about fanservice games, it was a lot easier to avoid. I'm not even at work (since it's a US holiday today), but some consideration for your fellow posters shouldn't take a back seat for a punchline.
I open the thread and there's immediately a gif of a dude ogling a buxom animated Japanese school girl. I get that clever titles are a thing and that's hilarious, but I'd rather not have my coworkers think that I'm wanking to loli hentai in the middle of the day. When that guy icecream made threads about fanservice games, it was a lot easier to avoid. I'm not even at work (since it's a US holiday today), but some consideration for your fellow posters shouldn't take a back seat for a punchline.
I open the thread and there's immediately a gif of a dude ogling a buxom animated Japanese school girl. I get that clever titles are a thing and that's hilarious, but I'd rather not have my coworkers think that I'm wanking to loli hentai in the middle of the day. When that guy icecream made threads about fanservice games, it was a lot easier to avoid. I'm not even at work (since it's a US holiday today), but some consideration for your fellow posters shouldn't take a back seat for a punchline.
I open the thread and there's immediately a gif of a dude ogling a buxom animated Japanese school girl. I get that clever titles are a thing and that's hilarious, but I'd rather not have my coworkers think that I'm wanking to loli hentai in the middle of the day. When that guy icecream made threads about fanservice games, it was a lot easier to avoid. I'm not even at work (since it's a US holiday today), but some consideration for your fellow posters shouldn't take a back seat for a punchline.
I open the thread and there's immediately a gif of a dude ogling a buxom animated Japanese school girl. I get that clever titles are a thing and that's hilarious, but I'd rather not have my coworkers think that I'm wanking to loli hentai in the middle of the day. When that guy icecream made threads about fanservice games, it was a lot easier to avoid. I'm not even at work (since it's a US holiday today), but some consideration for your fellow posters shouldn't take a back seat for a punchline.
ITT: People try to shame another poster for not knowing as much about underage cartoon porn as they do
ITT: People try to shame another poster for not knowing as much about underage cartoon porn as they do
Knowing what words mean = pedophile
Knowing what words mean = pedophile
I didn't write that many words so it should have been pretty easy to figure out whether or not I actually said that (I didn't)
You're right, you didn't call us pedophiles. You just implied we watched child porn. Big difference. I apologize.
This thread went exactly as I suspected it would when this title was revealed this morning
EDIT:lol
I'm fairly certain you're just throwing words out without knowing what they mean
icecream was a girl from what I heard. Also there is nothing loli or hentai about this game
Buxom Loli hentai?
If it was loli hentai it would be really, really NSFW. This is not even close, it is like saying a small cut wound is similar to a beheading.
Buxom and loli are the complete opposites of each other.
Fully clothed video game character = loli hentai. This is one for the ages.
No, just that you are more knowledgeable about the terminology. You can certainly know what the words mean without actually consuming the material, I just think that it's a strange thing to jump to correct.
GAF is super sensitive about illegal shit. I think it's prudent we make sure everyone's on the right page and the terminology used is well understood.ITT: People try to shame another poster for not knowing as much about underage cartoon porn as they do
No, just that you are more knowledgeable about the terminology. You can certainly know what the words mean without actually consuming the material, I just think that it's a strange thing to jump to correct.
Fucking perverted and borderline predatory in my view.
I will never understand Japans obsession with school girls.
Guys, attacking my porn vocabulary is just dancing around the issue at hand.
And this was shown at Sony's press conference? Ok
![]()
Eh it's still a press conference geared towards to JP market. This is CLEARLY something they would be interested in. Just look at E3. Lots of games showcase intense violence but that's accepted.
It's not that strange. As I said, the two terms mean completely different things so you should really know what you're complaining about before you use the word.
What issue? The girl is fully clothed, doesn't look that young, doesn't do sexual things. Calling a game like Criminal Girls or Monster Monpiece Loli Hentai I understand, they are borderline sexual, but this? C'mon now.
But this game isn't sexually exploitative at all. She's fully clothed, and you're not touching her or able to see her panties or anything. It's completely different from "loli hentai" and if you actually know what those words mean and don't realize that, I don't know what to say.Ok, they mean different things. So what? Why does the difference matter? Expand on that. Does that mean a game that uses sexually exploitative imagery of an underage prepubescent girl is wrong, but a game that uses sexually exploitative imagery of an underage post pubescent girl is ok?
Or was it just a gotcha moment that you couldn't resist?
This is how I saw it. Obviously, there are some games from Japan worth raging at (Criminal Girls IMO comes to mind). This one didn't seem like one of those games though. Just seemed like a flirty, cute piece of software. For goodness sake's though, we haven't seen anything about the game, so anyone raging against it is doing so prematurely.Pretty much. This is a pretty innocuous piece of software with flirtatious undertones. There's some good criticism about games like this in the thread, but some are just insane, coming from a place of ignorance.
ITT: People try to shame another poster for not knowing as much about underage cartoon porn as they do
But this game isn't sexually exploitative at all. She's fully clothed, and you're not touching her or able to see her panties or anything. It's completely different from "loli hentai" and if you actually know what those words mean and don't realize that, I don't know what to say.
Guys, attacking my porn vocabulary is just dancing around the issue at hand.
It's still a game that explicitly contemplates that a player will be leering at a high school student, which they have both encouraged by purposefully giving her clothing that reveals cleavage, and rewarded by making her do an embarrassed pose when you do so. And that's just from the GIFs in the op.
But, to my original point, I thought it was interesting that your original reply to ShoNuff wasn't "this isn't exploitative!" but "get your exploitation terminology right!"
Guys, attacking my porn vocabulary is just dancing around the issue at hand.
Knew Japan was going to do something like this with the tech but never thought Sony/Harada would go for it to launch the thing.
Its a brilliant move actually for that region.
This is how I saw it. Obviously, there are some games from Japan worth raging at (Criminal Girls IMO comes to mind). This one didn't seem like one of those games though. Just seemed like a flirty, cute piece of software. For goodness sake's though, we haven't seen anything about the game, so anyone raging against it is doing so prematurely.
If the game ends up being awful and sexually exploitative, let's rage about it together. But until we know what this thing really is, let's just all wait and see.
I don't think it's exploitative at all. It's definitely flirty, but it's completely different from something like Criminal Girls. If you were to call that game loli hentai, you might have an argument.
What issue? The girl is fully clothed, doesn't look that young, doesn't do sexual things. Calling a game like Criminal Girls or Monster Monpiece Loli Hentai I understand, they are borderline sexual, but this? C'mon now.
Dsix said:You're right, this game has a distinct lack of murder and torture. This is unacceptable.
So, is there a sliding scale? Sexualized imagery of a prepubescent character is unacceptable, but a lower level of sexualization of an underage character is ok as long as the character is post-pubescent? Then, once the character is 18, anything goes?