• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Asus ROG Swift PG278Q monitor, 1440p/144hz/G-Sync

Is there a way to track stock availability on amazon?

Set up a Page Monitor (Extension for Chrome) It should inform you of any changes made to the website or part of it.

Anyway, I got mine on Saturday morning and my first reaction was holy crap!

After being with IPS panel for last two years, the difference by going back to TN is HUGE!
Altho, GSync is pretty sweet. I will probably might end up returning it in about a week or two.

The only downside to this monitor is being TN panel and ugly just ugly colors but I have been spoiled by IPS panel for so long now, just hard to go back to TN.
 
I'm curious to hear some impressions of the color vs a QNIX QX2710 or other similar IPS/PLS panels.

I'm really torn between these two. The Gsync and 144hz though... sounds so glorious.

Also just a question in general, how jarring is it going from 90-120fps to 60fps on a 144hz monitor? Is it jarring at all?

its not jarring

and even 30-40 fps is smooth

i dont need 1440p...currently rocking the 1080p gsync....could do with a 32 inch gsync...my god pls
 
Am I an idiot to even consider this screen if I only have a single GTX680 2GB? I'll be upgrading my GPU/CPU/mobo next year anyway but really like the features of this screen. I have a crappy 60hz 1080p screen at the moment but I'm getting sick of the screen tearing vs input lag on a lot of games.
 
Ugh, given I missed the open spots for this monitor now I'm tempted to wait and see how the gsync'd 4K monitors turn out. Won't actually be using 144hz much at all given the settings and IQ level I like but then again it would be nice for general day to day computer use.

Choices are hard.
 
Oh shit, like 60hz Gsync type thing? I thought it was limited to 144hz sets for some reason. A 4k Gsync at 60hz might be more than enough for my needs.

But naaaaaaaah.

I'll probably just get a 1080p one.
 
So I'll buy this if I can get a discount or something. I don't want to spend more than $550 for it.

I already have a VG248QE but 27 inches, 1440p, and G-sync are tempting.
 
Am I an idiot to even consider this screen if I only have a single GTX680 2GB? I'll be upgrading my GPU/CPU/mobo next year anyway but really like the features of this screen. I have a crappy 60hz 1080p screen at the moment but I'm getting sick of the screen tearing vs input lag on a lot of games.

I went for it with a similar setup. My plan is to upgrade next year as well, but the immidiate benefits are still awesome. I've had to turn down a few settings a bit to get the same framrate from games, but if you can live with not always running everything at very high there are no drawbacks.
 
Really curious how the Acer 4k G-sync models turn out

The tech really makes sense at the resolution

The tech makes sense even with 720p.

It's all about how much GPU power you have in relation to the amount of pixels you want to output to.

Since Nvidia is building an integrated ARM CPU into one of their upcoming GPUs I would really be interested in someone making a laptop with their tech and gsync. I imagine the gaming experience would be heads and shoulders above anything seen before in that form factor.

I meant using "Eyefinity", hence AMD cards. Sure it's a 1ms 144Hz 1440p panel but G-Sync!!

Well even if he is using AMD cards there aren't any other 8-Bit 1440p 120+mhz TN panels out there.
 
I want one so bad. But it doesnt have a hdmi port. I also connected my ps4 to my current monitor. Why? I dont have enough room in my tv stand.
And its plays smoother on a monitor, it seems.
 
I want one so bad. But it doesnt have a hdmi port. I also connected my ps4 to my current monitor. Why? I dont have enough room in my tv stand.
And its plays smoother on a monitor, it seems.
Because the G-Sync module replaces the entire I/O section, and it can only accept a single (DP) input.
 
Alright folks, I received my monitor yesterday. I have a single 780ti/intel 4770k system and was a little worried this monitor would be too much for my system to run games smoothly.

TL;DR: Everything runs great. My old monitor and system was like putting a corvette engine in a ford pinto. It ran fast, but looked like shit. For me, this monitor changes everything.

Initial impressions:

This thing is huge. I'm coming from a 1080p, 60Hz, 22 in monitor and I was super excited when I set this thing down next to my old monitor and saw how much bigger it is.

The build quality is great. Sleek design and so easy to navigate the OSD. No dead pixels or other issues.

It was easy to set everthing up. I had been reading everything about the monitor so I knew to download the driver off of ASUS website and enable G-Sync (it was already on).

My first game to load up was Battlefield 4. It took awhile to get the settings to lock in game. I had set the refresh rate to 144 hz and it wouldn't take. I restarted and things were fine. My initial impressions were off a bit because of this. I have noticed this a lot in the impression threads. I think it takes a restart or a little tinkering to get the games to "work" in g-sync. This is due more to the game, than the monitor though.

The screen looks great. I am glad I've never had an IPS to compare it to, because it looks amazing. The resolution and "feel" of 144 hz is really nice. g-sync works great.

The only quirk I've seen is with a few games(RAGE, STALKER) where the mouse ends up on the extended desktop. I am running my old monitor on the hdmi port of the 780ti and it works fine otherwise.


Tested games(all with v-sync off):

Battlefield 4
Battlefield 3
Titanfall
Crysis 1, 2, 3
Skyrim
Rage (mouse issue)
Stalker (mouse issue)
WoW
CS: GO
Wolfenstein new order
Far Cry 3
Arma 3
DayZ
Watch_Dogs(high textures was smooth, Utra still a *tiny* bit laggy)
Borderlands 2
Dota 2


I was having so much fun with Battlefield 4 last night I didn't want to stop playing. I swear my KDR is going to increase due to this new monitor. Plus I ended up having a good squad that used voice comms and worked together. I got into a helicopter and was playing around with the camera and just enjoying looking at how smooth and detailed everything was.

I jumped in a game of Titanfall and before I had to tweak it a bit because without v-sync enabled the game ran like horseshit and even then it was odd. Now it is smooth as silk with v-sync off and g-sync. I ended up at the top of the leaderboards on the first game I played in forever.

Certainly the increased resolution was a game changer because I could see enemies at farther away than I normally would. It was like having aimbot. The smoothness of the gameplay really helped as well.

So for anybody on the fence with only a single card, don't worry. I know a 780ti is pretty top of the line, but I see NO need to upgrade to SLI at this point and can wait for the next single card solution to come out.
 
Good impressions. Especially about the advantage of gives you. Agree about SLI. Once the next gen cards hit and provide more juice I think a single high end card paired with Gsync will be the way to go.

As someone with 3x Titan Blacks I dunno how to feel about that. There's always 4k :p
 
Finally got mine. I almost didn't even get to try it out yesterday because my wife was hospitalized the day before (long story, she's home and recovering now doing fine).

So after running around all day getting her released and picking up prescriptions and getting her car back home etc, I was exhausted and barely felt any excitement when I got the thing hooked up. But then I turned it on and played some games...wow. Unfreakinbelievable. Games running over 100 FPS, zero input lag and zero clipping. I feel like I'm jacking into the matrix or something. I'm coming from a 60hz 24" display at 1080p and it's just night and day.

I too have a 780ti and it's doing just fine keeping most games over 100FPS, except for the newest games at the highest settings. Even then you can tell how much gsync improves the experience because dropping frame rates don't result in stuttering.

Also the ULMB tech makes desktop and web environments so much better. I'm keeping mine at 120hz so I can have ULMB when not gaming. So smooth. I still need to calibrate the colors but overall my jaw is on the floor. The extra size is nice too.
 
Also the UL!B tech makes desktop and web environments so much better. I'm keeping mine at 120hz so I can have ULMB when not gaming. So smooth. I still need to calibrate the colors but overall my jaw is on the floor. .

I am interested in doing the same. How much of a trade-off is there running 120hz/144hz while gaming?
 
I am interested in doing the same. How much of a trade-off is there running 120hz/144hz while gaming?

Honestly I can't tell the difference between the two, and a lot of games won't even hit 120 regularly if everything is maxed so for me running 120 has minimal impact on anything in games. On the desktop it makes a difference because it allows for ULMB, which is huge when it comes to scrolling text and stuff. You can't have ULMB enabled with gsync however, so in games it's either/or.
 
I got mine yesterday as did a friend of mine. I'm still on a 580, so I sadly can't take full advantage of it (and for some reason I'm limited to 85hz, any ideas anyone?), but I checked it out at said friend's place and am so excited to upgrade my GPU.

G-Sync ruled in every game we tried it with, but MAME in particular was heaven for me. 57.5hz games. 55hz games. G-Sync doesn't give a shit. Flickering shadows just work, no slamming tear lines. Everything is as smooth as could be, but without stacking on additional lag and without altering the speed of the game. The only lag present was the lag present on the original hardware. Such a massive leap in terms of emulation quality. And yes, the monitor in vertical orientation has the usual TN viewing angle issues, but it's a significant step up from my last TN in this regard and I'm ecstatic that it's good enough.

ULMB is also nuts, even my GF was impressed at the UFO test.
 
Still no leads on these being available anywhere?

Also that store on Amazon that put it up on 'preorder' for $893 to block amazon's inventory check is a jerk.
 
Eyefinity is an AMD specific term.
Also, surround gaming doesn't work with GSYNC yet... and when it does, you will need a tri SLI setup.

... iirc, are you using 295x2 Ulysses31?

I meant using "Eyefinity", hence AMD cards. Sure it's a 1ms 144Hz 1440p panel but G-Sync!!

What are you running in 3 way SLI?

Should look great in that setup with thin bezels.

I use 295x2s so obviously no G-Sync for me which is fine by me.

I bought these monitors mainly for the 2560x1440 res at 120/144 hz, 1 ms, thin bezels and ULMB.

And the color callibration out of the box is much better than my old BenQs.
 
Honestly I can't tell the difference between the two, and a lot of games won't even hit 120 regularly if everything is maxed so for me running 120 has minimal impact on anything in games. On the desktop it makes a difference because it allows for ULMB, which is huge when it comes to scrolling text and stuff. You can't have ULMB enabled with gsync however, so in games it's either/or.

Can the monitor (or driver) selectively turn on G-Sync when in a game and turn it off (and turn ULMB on) when you return to the desktop, or do you have to do it manually?
 
Can the monitor (or driver) selectively turn on G-Sync when in a game and turn it off (and turn ULMB on) when you return to the desktop, or do you have to do it manually?

Nope. You have to do it manually. You have to set your refresh rate and then hit the button on the monitor to turn on ULMB.

Edit - Well shit, I'm wrong. :) Thaedolus is correct.
 
Actually I just tried it out: gsync seems to set the monitor to 144hz as soon as I open a game, then when I close it it goes back to 120 and ULMB comes back on. So for me it's switching it on and off automatically. I assume if I disabled gsync ULMB would stay on
 
Actually I just tried it out: gsync seems to set the monitor to 144hz as soon as I open a game, then when I close it it goes back to 120 and ULMB comes back on. So for me it's switching it on and off automatically. I assume if I disabled gsync ULMB would stay on

Would you say ULMB makes a lot of difference for general windows use (browsing etc). My Swift is currently in "normal" mode on the desktop...
 
Actually I just tried it out: gsync seems to set the monitor to 144hz as soon as I open a game, then when I close it it goes back to 120 and ULMB comes back on. So for me it's switching it on and off automatically. I assume if I disabled gsync ULMB would stay on

Hot damn. That was my biggest issue. re: having to manually switch back and forth. Gonna have to try it out later tonight.
 
Actually I just tried it out: gsync seems to set the monitor to 144hz as soon as I open a game, then when I close it it goes back to 120 and ULMB comes back on. So for me it's switching it on and off automatically. I assume if I disabled gsync ULMB would stay on

A tip of the hat to you good Sir! It works for me too on my modded Asus. I swear I tried to do it before and it wouldn't work.
 
Here's one thing I hadn't thought about until now: Does G-sync work with windowed or borderless windowed games? That would be a deal breaker if it isn't compatible.
 
Well, I have to say after waiting months for this monitor to arrive, I'm definitely not disappointed. This is a very nice display with features that I think will now be essential in a monitor for me. I'm getting hit by the double whammy of pixel density and image stability / consistency. This is after using a 1680x1050 120Hz display exclusively for the last 4 years.

G-Sync mode is a complete revelation with some games, while ULMB mode at 120Hz/120fps is eye-wateringly lovely.
I do seem to be hitting a G-Sync bug that others online have reported; every once in a while in G-Sync mode, the display seems to lose signal. ASUS state it's a G-Sync problem and that NVIDIA are fixing it with a driver update. Re-attaching the DisplayPort cable seems to work-around it for now.

I assume you were using your previous 120hz monitor with vsync on, right? And the revelation is from the lack of input lag? Otherwise I don't understand how G-Sync could make a significant visual difference, particularly in terms of screen tear. If one owns a 120/144hz monitor I would imagine one would want to prioritize configuring their games in such a way that they'd average a framerate high enough to put their refresh rate to use. From personal experience and what I've heard from friends screen tearing just isn't noticeable until the framerate tanks below ~60.

I understand the benefit of GSync at 1440p, even the strongest of PCs will struggle to maintain a constant ~8.3ms render time, but at 1080p Gsync seems to me like a gimmick with little benefit unless one deliberately cranks GFX settings to the max and tanks their fps in the process. But, again, why would one do that if they have a 144hz monitor? What am I missing here?
 
Just got it up and running, and it looks great! No dead/bright pixels either, as far as I can tell.

I tried ULMB and it seems that using it turns the overdrive to Extreme because there is severe ghosting when it's enabled. It does drastically reduce motion blur though, so maybe I'll find a use for it! It also doesn't turn the brightness down that much compared to the brightness I'm most comfortable with, which is great considering I've seen many people complain about how much brightness is lost when using ULMB.

The jump from 60Hz to 144Hz is mindblowing, by the way. I wasn't really expecting this, but my web browsing experience is much improved as well.
 
Top Bottom