No, but if you are asked, everyone can go about their day quicker if you just comply. It's just an ID.
Not quite sure where you got that from.
You shouldn't be handcuffed for not showing your ID.
No, but if you are asked, everyone can go about their day quicker if you just comply. It's just an ID.
Not quite sure where you got that from.
These cops are fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked.
No, but if you are asked, everyone can go about their day quicker if you just comply. It's just an ID.
Nope. My showing my ID doesn't help the officer in any way because I haven't done anything wrong. What does me showing them my ID as compared to telling them my name accomplish?
Depends on the state. Not in California though.Do you not have to show ID if a police officer asks you? Genuine question.
Though the thing is if the person has done nothing wrong they shouldn't have too. Also it just leads into so many other things that could go wrong.No, but if you are asked, everyone can go about their day quicker if you just comply. It's just an ID.
Choose to assert you rights and not show police ID when you're not under suspicion of a crime. Get handcuffed. Gaf blames women for asserting her rights.
Your an internet user and your name is very threatening. I can't say you're an extremely violent person who goes around firing tracking unsuspecting victims IP addresses, stalking them and then firing cannons at them. BUT I can't say you're not someone that does that either. I have no proof! Regardless, show me your ID or I'll arrest you and embarrases you in public for no other reason than I don't like your name.
Seems ridiculous doesn't it?
Yeah, so does what the cop here did.
Women gets arrested for being black. It's stupid as fuck.
Funny you say that, because that's how we actually picture your police.
You can lie about your name and they get the opportunity to check if there are any warrants out for your arrest. That's literally the only point and look at it from their perspective, they know nothing about you other than the initial suspicion that brought them to talk to you, they don't just trust blindly. I'm also talking in general here, I'm aware the situation here doesn't make much sense with whats provided in the article.
Because this is America.
You need to stop. Your sarcasm isn't going to go very far.
I enjoy how many people in here equate being asked to show ID to having all of your rights waived and bringing on nazi germany in america.
Opening your mind to a different viewpoint to learn? Nah, fuck that.
Are you white? Just curious. You're delusional if you think this isn't about race.
Must be nice not being a minority.I enjoy how many people in here equate being asked to show ID to having all of your rights waived and bringing on nazi germany in america.
No, but if you are asked, everyone can go about their day quicker if you just comply. It's just an ID.
That is a fucked up mess right there.
The ID discussion is irrelevant to the conversation, imo. Let's focus on getting wrongfully accused for being a prostitute.
It doesn't seem like you have an open mind either. Just sayin.Opening your mind to a different viewpoint to learn? Nah, fuck that.
How can this in happen in Cali? I thought this stuff only happens in the South.
Must be nice not being a minority.
a place with the most oppressive police in the western world.
it's funny all these "this is america" posts about how you don't have to show ID because 'merica and freedom and all that stuff. Yet, if Americans realised how the rest of the western world worked they would realise how oppressed they are.
They had no legal precedent to detain her, she wasn't under suspicion for any crime. Not complying to show your id shouldn't result in handcuffs. They probably wanted an easy collar and thought they could get it.Opening your mind to a different viewpoint to learn? Nah, fuck that.
I don't understand...are you saying that the poster is wrong and we have to show ID?
This situation doesn't speak for being asked for an ID in general. In this case, it doesn't sound like she should have ever even been approached for any reason.
But under circumstances where the cops have reasonable suspicions and you are innocent, showing ID seems fine to me. Seeing my clean record is just one more thing to help weed through suspicions.
Eh, I guess it just seems fine to show ID most of the time to me. And that has little to do with what makes this case wrong. I think we know profiling is the big problem that started this case from what we can tell.
You can lie about your name and they get the opportunity to check if there are any warrants out for your arrest. That's literally the only point and look at it from their perspective, they know nothing about you other than the initial suspicion that brought them to talk to you, they don't just trust blindly. I'm also talking in general here, I'm aware the situation here doesn't make much sense with whats provided in the article.
They had no legal precedent to detain her, she wasn't under suspicion for any crime. Not complying to showing your id shouldn't result in handcuffs. They probably wanted and easy collar and thought they could get it.
Opening your mind to a different viewpoint to learn? Nah, fuck that.
What evidence could they present that justifies detainment? Keeping in mind California is not a stop and ID state.Prostitution?
Let me see your ID.Wrong assumption.
They had no legal precedent to detain her, she wasn't under suspicion for any crime. Not complying to show your id shouldn't result in handcuffs. They probably wanted an easy collar and thought they could get it.
Kissing someone in public is not probable cause.Prostitution?
What evidence could they present that justifies detainment?
And what does that have to do with anything? The guy was talking about the fact that in the US, you don't have to show ID.No, s/he's saying that in most parts of the western world you won't get a gun point at you for something minor like making a quick movement.
She was black.What evidence could they present that justifies detainment? Keeping in mind California is not a stop and ID state.
What evidence could they present that justifies detainment?
What other reason would a white man have for kissing a colored?
What other reason would a white man have for kissing a colored?
No, but if you are asked, everyone can go about their day quicker if you just comply. It's just your constitutional rights.
I dunno what the situation was, ask them. Not saying their assumption was correct since it obviously wasn't, but if they thought she was a prostitute then she was under suspicion for a crime.
How can this in happen in Cali? I thought this stuff only happens in the South.
What viewpoint?
Cop sees a black chick with a shaved head kissing a white man, in awkward/old clothing - profiles her as a potential prostitute. Harasses them without cause, and then detains her without legal reason.
The different viewpoint is obvious and shitty.
Because the general sentiment is to stick it to the man and assert your rights against those who would try to oppress you. Yeah, this story is probably shit but we don't really get the other hundreds of news stories a day where the cop was in the right but had to deal with this hassle. If you have your ID on you, just how it. Raising suspicion on yourself over nothing seems pointless.
You don't have to. It's your right not to show your ID. You have the right to remain silent and also to ask if you're free to leave if you're not being detained.
https://www.aclu.org/drug-law-refor...acial-justice/know-your-rights-what-do-if-you
http://www.flexyourrights.org/faqs/when-can-police-ask-for-id/
Some states have laws where you have to identify yourself, but only if you're detained (reasonable suspicion that you committed a crime). California is not one of those states.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes
![]()
There are lots of reasons not to show your ID. Hypothetically: If you're Mexican-American in Arizona, for example, I imagine it might be irritating and insulting to be stopped for being Mexican and to be asked to prove you're a citizen. This was a huge thing recently with the "papers please" laws Arizona tried to pass.
In this case, Daniele Watts had no reason to provide her identity, as she was doing nothing wrong and simply living her life like a normal person.
And what does that have to do with anything? The guy was talking about the fact that in the US, you don't have to show ID.