TC McQueen
Member
That's exactly what he plans to do.when watercooling you buy the reference model
That's exactly what he plans to do.when watercooling you buy the reference model
The EVGA 980 FTW will be an even bigger jump, maybe wait for that.
any idea when that's coming out?
That's exactly what he plans to do.
Didn't know AMD had something planed a week after the Nvidia event:
![]()
Didn't know AMD had something planed a week after the Nvidia event:
Yeah.. I wanted the Asus card (because I've been very happy with my current 660 Ti from Asus), but when I saw it was not in stock until next week I started looking into the MSI card (which I ordered yesterday)
The conclusion (that I read..) from the two reviews I read was that the noise level was really good on both, and just about the same (I think the Asus card was ~0.5dB less than the MSI).
The difference was that the MSI card was a tiny bit faster, was a little bit cooler, but drew about 6-7 watts more during max load.
Here's one of the comparisons (there are more, but don't remember where)
http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/562...ncl-ultra-hd-test-asus-vs-msi-geforce-gtx-970
Didn't know AMD had something planed a week after the Nvidia event:
![]()
Any rumors about what it could be?
I mentioned this in another thread, but it's not likely a gaming GPU announcement.
It would be wonderful if AMD got their mess together with CPUs and pushed Intel.
not happening, Intel is like 4-6 years ahead of everyone at the moment
I think there was also a blue/red pill pic?I mentioned this in another thread, but it's not likely a gaming GPU announcement.
wait wtf, the gtx 800 series is not out.how is this out?
Skipped 800 series for parody with laptop GPUs.
Think I'll ask again,will the i7-950 be a bottleneck with a 970?
Any handy tips for OC'ng?at stock it could depending on the game, overclocked it'll be fine though. I'd aim for 3.8-4 GHz
Any handy tips for OC'ng?
Parity?
Laptop GPUs already dipped into the 800 series naming convention, Nvidia decided to go to 900 series for both laptop and desktop for parity.
670 -> 970 does it make any sense? I haven't upgraded in a while. Mhm...
How long before 4gb of RAM becomes a bottleneck at 1080p?
at stock it could depending on the game, overclocked it'll be fine though. I'd aim for 3.8-4 GHz
Yep, it pretty much hits that sweet spot 50% improvement that I was basically waiting for. Upgrading from a 2GB 670 as well.Any idea how much better it is compared to my old gtx670 2gb?
I am thinking 40-50% improvement?
Some of us want a bit more. Believe it or not, there are games other than LoL out there that somebody might want to play at 1440p(especially for those with a 1440p monitor....). Hell, I only have a 1080p monitor, but I'm moderately picky about aliasing so love me some dowsampling/SGSSAA where I can get it. Star Citizen is actually playable for many right now, not just in two years. Many people have VR headsets that need a good amount of power to run. Upcoming games like Ryse, AC Unity, FC4 and The Witcher 3(and more) may struggle to hit 60fps without a nice card. I'm trying to play Minecraft with extreme shaders(looks ridiculously good), but probably need something a bit more powerful to hit 60fps more reliably. I also love Skyrim and would enjoy being able to throw a ton of extra graphics mods at it to get it looking more amazing. Plenty of other older games that I could really give the treatment now as well.Why is everyone acting like the 7xx series is absolute garbage now? As if there is anything out right now that would put that through it's paces, let alone the 980/970 now.
I get that it's better...but what PC games are there that actually tax these things? Playing LoL at 2560x1440? Why wouldn't most people jump on the super cheap 770/780 train right now and take advantage of the price drop.
Star Citizen is the only PC game I know coming out that will require a pretty hefty computer to play well, and that's still at least 2 years off at this point.
With the MSI, right?Just did a comparison to the Grid Autosport benchmark. http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74853-evga-geforce-gtx-970-ftw/?page=7
My score with overclocked 970.
In what games?I think it already has.
In what games?
Why is everyone acting like the 7xx series is absolute garbage now? As if there is anything out right now that would put that through it's paces, let alone the 980/970 now.
I get that it's better...but what PC games are there that actually tax these things? Playing LoL at 2560x1440? Why wouldn't most people jump on the super cheap 770/780 train right now and take advantage of the price drop.
Star Citizen is the only PC game I know coming out that will require a pretty hefty computer to play well, and that's still at least 2 years off at this point.
Yep, it pretty much hits that sweet spot 50% improvement that I was basically waiting for. Upgrading from a 2GB 670 as well.
Wowowow.. wait.
So the 970 is about 50% faster/stronger than a 670?
I'm still rocking a HD5870 which is about 50% weaker than a 670.
A 670 is actually double the power of a 5870. So a 5870 is 50% weaker, but you could also say that a 670 is 100% more powerful. Gotta be careful with how you word percentages.Wowowow.. wait.
So the 970 is about 50% faster/stronger than a 670?
I'm still rocking a HD5870 which is about 50% weaker than a 670.
...
Does this mean a jump from HD5870 -> GTX970 would be double the performance?
There are a few out there.I don't think there are any reviews that compare the 970 to the 670
If I am getting it right, MSI's Twin Frozr and Asus' Strix are both cool and silent 970s, while EVGA's FTW is a highly overclocked card that's almost on par with a reference 980, and not too loud to boot. Am I right? Would that FTW be a right choice for a future SLI?
I asked before about the "get a blower type of card if you are planning a SLI system", but as I've seen photos of SLI rigs with aftermarket coolers, I guess that it's not that much of a deal.
If you have a high airflow case then 2 non-reference cards can be ok. If you haveva smaller case and/or your airflow isnt very good you can run into problems.
My same dilemma.
Also, I still have a glorious i5 2500K@4.4 GHz and I'm concerned about bottlenecks.
I think that my neogaf approved Fractal Define R4 qualifies as a high airflow case XD. Thanks, you've helped me narrowing what to get!
If I am getting it right, MSI's Twin Frozr and Asus' Strix are both cool and silent 970s, while EVGA's FTW is a highly overclocked card that's almost on par with a reference 980, and not too loud to boot. Am I right? Would that FTW be a right choice for a future SLI?
I asked before about the "get a blower type of card if you are planning a SLI system", but as I've seen photos of SLI rigs with aftermarket coolers, I guess that it's not that much of a deal.
This is also something which I'm wondering myself (also a 2500K owner). I wish there would've been some clearance on this subject, but it's all so "vague" to me. Anyone care to enlighten?
Does this mean a jump from HD5870 -> GTX970 would be double the performance?
Let's just say they put the answer to that question in the title of the Build a PC thread for a reason.It's been answered many times, so far there's no game that needs anything more, I finally overclocked my 2500K slightly to 4.2GHz and don't anticipate any problems. Also something always bottlenecks, if it's not the CPU it's the GPU.
There are a few out there.
A 670 is actually double the power of a 5870. So a 5870 is 50% weaker, but you could also say that a 670 is 100% more powerful. Gotta be careful with how you word percentages.
A 970 is going to be like 300% faster than your 5870. At least.
Yeah but it's so hard to believe for me lol. How can a 5 year old CPU run a brand new high end GPU (like the 980) at full force and not comprimise anything? Computer magic and overclocking I guess. Still a fact that's hard for me to grasp. Happy with the reality though.
Wowowow.. wait.
So the 970 is about 50% faster/stronger than a 670?
I'm still rocking a HD5870 which is about 50% weaker than a 670.
...
Does this mean a jump from HD5870 -> GTX970 would be double the performance?