You and me both. I'm about to say screw it and just get the Zotac. At least it's in stock.
Don't. The MSI one is great.
You and me both. I'm about to say screw it and just get the Zotac. At least it's in stock.
Finally got my water blocks in.
![]()
Could still push further, but im good for now, time to actullay play some games!
My last 3 GPUs have been AMD. I haven't been with team green since my GeForce 7800GS (AGP, lol). I've installed my ASUS Strix 970. Launched Borderlands 2 with High Physx to test it out. Using the same monitor as I was using with my previous GPU. I noticed something I previously thought was a trick of the mind, but seems to be real.
I'll probably explain this badly... but do Nvidia cards display... smoother than an equivalent AMD? I first noticed this when my friend brought over his PC and we'd play games together (a year or two ago). We both had 60Hz monitors and both our rigs ran whatever we played maxed out at 60. But the image on his screen always looked smoother (had higher temporal resolution?) even when I started up FRAPS to check I was at 60.
Then it happened with my 970. As soon as I started playing, I noticed something was different. Borderlands 2 looked smoother than before (and I just finished beating the game a week ago on my AMD card). My AMD 7950 never dipped from 60 while playing BL2, but my 970 still looks noticeably smoother. Does Nvidia deliver the frames more... precisely, is their V-Sync... better? I can't explain it but my Nvidia card (and my friend's Nvidia card) render the same games more smoothly than my AMD even if they both are locked at 60 FPS.
What black magic is this? I wouldn't blame you if you have no idea what I'm talking about. I didn't think it was a real thing until I got my 970--I just thought my friend had a nicer monitor or something. But my Nvidia looks better at the same FPS, on the same monitor than my AMD did, in the temporal resolution sense (if that makes sense? haha).
I guess I'm about to find out for myself too.. I've been using AMD/ATI since the R8500. I've held a grudge against Nvidia since the FX5900 debacle and terrible business practices. The GTX 970 was just too good and I had to let bygones...My last 3 GPUs have been AMD. I haven't been with team green since my GeForce 7800GS (AGP, lol). I've installed my ASUS Strix 970. Launched Borderlands 2 with High Physx to test it out. Using the same monitor as I was using with my previous GPU. I noticed something I previously thought was a trick of the mind, but seems to be real.
I'll probably explain this badly... but do Nvidia cards display... smoother than an equivalent AMD? I first noticed this when my friend brought over his PC and we'd play games together (a year or two ago). We both had 60Hz monitors and both our rigs ran whatever we played maxed out at 60. But the image on his screen always looked smoother (had higher temporal resolution?) even when I started up FRAPS to check I was at 60.
Then it happened with my 970. As soon as I started playing, I noticed something was different. Borderlands 2 looked smoother than before (and I just finished beating the game a week ago on my AMD card). My AMD 7950 never dipped from 60 while playing BL2, but my 970 still looks noticeably smoother. Does Nvidia deliver the frames more... precisely, is their V-Sync... better? I can't explain it but my Nvidia card (and my friend's Nvidia card) render the same games more smoothly than my AMD even if they both are locked at 60 FPS.
What black magic is this? I wouldn't blame you if you have no idea what I'm talking about. I didn't think it was a real thing until I got my 970--I just thought my friend had a nicer monitor or something. But my Nvidia looks better at the same FPS, on the same monitor than my AMD did, in the temporal resolution sense (if that makes sense? haha).
![]()
Sure. Should have posted this in the first place but I didn't notice the details button before.
What black magic is this?
What are you fellow asus strix 970 owners getting for OC
And does anyone know where I can change the fan settings? I want the fans to start at a lower temp, say around 45c
Pretty good Evo X. Basically getting the same graphic score. How does the combined score work? Yours it a bit higher then mine for some reason even though my physic score is 1200
I think people should use something else for benching like Heaven. Might be more accurate when it comes to gpu performance. It also seems to be more sensitive to overclocks
What are you fellow asus strix 970 owners getting for OC
And does anyone know where I can change the fan settings? I want the fans to start at a lower temp, say around 45c
both of the ones in my system are sitting at 1400/1475 boost. All I did was increase power to 120, no voltage increase. I haven't put the second card in alone to see if it could get a higher OC though.
And yes you can set the fans to do whatever. It's easy.
Turns out that wasn't even my best score. Just updated that post above with another pic.
Can you post your score? Combined is being bottleneck by my CPU I'd imagine, which is only going to get worse when I add another card. Oh well, I should be able to move these GPUs over to my Skylake build next year.
No idea how you guys get those fancy header shots.
Graphics 15148
Physic 12051
Combined 5630
Total: 12543
I don't like messing with the voltage so I have only done +150/+140 on my GPU.
![]()
-ASUS Strix 970
-3770k @ 4.2GHz
-970 @ Core: 1500MHz, Memory: 3900 somethings (+400MHz on Afterburner) (I don't even know what the memory clock is... Nvidia spec page says 7 Gbps.. which is bandwidth, not a clock speed... Umm, Afterburner says 3900; 3900 what? I don't know)
-Max temperature was 70C
I'm happy with my card.
Heaven Benchmark 4.0 score: 1045 (41 FPS average) (Max temp: 73C)
So. I finally said 'fuck it' and ordered the Acer G-Sync monitor. QA on the swift sounds like a nightmare (I've seen multiple people who have returned 3 monitors and aren't happy) and pixel inversion seems to be a major issue, espescially on 3D, which is a huge thing for me.
And it may sound weird, but 1080p works better for DSR letting me do a straight scale down from 4K with 0% smoothing (which looks beautiful on a native 1080p panel). So yes, bigger pixels.
But these 3 980s have been bottle necked for FAR too long, and I'm not wading through crap to get myself a Swift only to find 3D looks terrible on it. I'm getting the slightly cheaper monitor that everyone seems happy with. And I know I'll be happy with it too.
I recently grabbed a Shield Tablet, and I'm so impressed with it. Gamestream works fabulously over Wifi and I was amazed at how well it worked over the internet from work too... Alien Isolation is probably a best case scenario in many ways, but I played an entire DLC mission on it. You really need to fork over the extra monies for the cover and the controller, and I'd recommend grabbing an mini hdmi to full size hdmi adaptor too, but it's a great companion to this PC that's helping me squeeze extra value out of it.
And I swear to god, Bioshock Infinite was more playable over the internet than Killzone Shadowfall is using remote play in the same house as my PS4.
If you're interested in pairing up your 970 or 980 with one... I say go for it.
I'll post impressions of G-Sync with my 3 SLI 980s come Thursday. I'm feeling better for having ordered the Acer already.
both of the ones in my system are sitting at 1400/1475 boost. All I did was increase power to 120, no voltage increase. I haven't put the second card in alone to see if it could get a higher OC though.
And yes you can set the fans to do whatever. It's easy.
So. I finally said 'fuck it' and ordered the Acer G-Sync monitor.
So. I finally said 'fuck it' and ordered the Acer G-Sync monitor. QA on the swift sounds like a nightmare (I've seen multiple people who have returned 3 monitors and aren't happy) and pixel inversion seems to be a major issue, espescially on 3D, which is a huge thing for me.
And it may sound weird, but 1080p works better for DSR letting me do a straight scale down from 4K with 0% smoothing (which looks beautiful on a native 1080p panel). So yes, bigger pixels.
But these 3 980s have been bottle necked for FAR too long, and I'm not wading through crap to get myself a Swift only to find 3D looks terrible on it. I'm getting the slightly cheaper monitor that everyone seems happy with. And I know I'll be happy with it too.
I recently grabbed a Shield Tablet, and I'm so impressed with it. Gamestream works fabulously over Wifi and I was amazed at how well it worked over the internet from work too... Alien Isolation is probably a best case scenario in many ways, but I played an entire DLC mission on it. You really need to fork over the extra monies for the cover and the controller, and I'd recommend grabbing an mini hdmi to full size hdmi adaptor too, but it's a great companion to this PC that's helping me squeeze extra value out of it.
And I swear to god, Bioshock Infinite was more playable over the internet than Killzone Shadowfall is using remote play in the same house as my PS4.
If you're interested in pairing up your 970 or 980 with one... I say go for it.
I'll post impressions of G-Sync with my 3 SLI 980s come Thursday. I'm feeling better for having ordered the Acer already.
I've read other people only oc'ing the core and mem speeds, what does only increasing the power do?
From what I understanding you could increase every value, just a little at a time until you get no complications. So are the 4 variables the core speed, the mem speed, the power, and the voltage?
Man, I get that you're frustrated with waiting, but the ROG Swift really is a thing of beauty playing PC games at max. Then again, I don't have any of the QA issues you mentioned.
IMO, Tri-SLI 980s powering a single 1080p monitor doesn't seem right. Hell, I feel like my dual 980s are gonna be overkill for a single 1440p panel. 4K downsampling to 1080 will be nice, but with three 980s, I'm sure you could have gotten away with 5K downsampling to 1440 in a lot of games.
Best of luck to you though. I hope the Acer treats you well. If you're not satisfied, hope you ordered from Amazon in case you change your mind and want to return/exchange it.
One issue i noticed tho is a louder kind of buzzing noise in my headphones since i put in the new card. Its not coil whine, as theres no noise coming from the card, its just a sort of background high pitched noise when playing games. Ive had it with most computers ive owned, but it seems worse than usual now. I dont know if its just cheap earphones im using or what tho. But its definitely louder and more annoying with the 970
Are you actually using a soundcard or just the freebie motherboard audio?
I've experienced the headphone buzzing you're referring to in the past when I had to use motherboard audio, and also if I plugged my headphones into the front jacks instead of directly into the soundcard in the back.
One issue i noticed tho is a louder kind of buzzing noise in my headphones since i put in the new card. Its not coil whine, as theres no noise coming from the card, its just a sort of background high pitched noise when playing games. Ive had it with most computers ive owned, but it seems worse than usual now. I dont know if its just cheap earphones im using or what tho. But its definitely louder and more annoying with the 970
Man, so happy with the results of the 970 so far. Tested a couple of games last night.
Metro 2033 Redux was about 30fps, max settings at 4k. It was actually perfectly playable at 4k, but i bumped it down to either 2.5K or 3K and got almost solid 60fps.
Alan Wake, everything maxed, 3k res, 60fps solid. 4k was about 30-40fps.
Warhammer 40k Space Marine was 60fps solid at 4k.
God damn Nvidia this is some good shit. The image quality at 4k is just....beautiful. Metro Redux blew me away
Is there a way to change the LED from the Gigabyte Windforce GTX970?
![]()
I would love to replace it with a green LED!
Man, so happy with the results of the 970 so far. Tested a couple of games last night.
Metro 2033 Redux was about 30fps, max settings at 4k. It was actually perfectly playable at 4k, but i bumped it down to either 2.5K or 3K and got almost solid 60fps.
Alan Wake, everything maxed, 3k res, 60fps solid. 4k was about 30-40fps.
Warhammer 40k Space Marine was 60fps solid at 4k.
God damn Nvidia this is some good shit. The image quality at 4k is just....beautiful. Metro Redux blew me away
This waiting game sucks... I'll be at the two week mark in a couple days with no news from Amazon on shipping details.
What kind of wait times have other people been experiencing with Amazon? I ordered a Gigabyte 970 G1 on the 25th.
I'm not upset with Amazon and I get its a hot commodity item, I'm just excited.
Ugh, you are not making it easy for me and others waiting on the 8GB version(or 6)..I was going to get one, until the reference card sold-out pretty fast. But Amazon has the PNY version up..I so want to pull the trigger and put it inside my X51.
I had a similar problem with my speakers (nothing to do with a 970 or whatever)... Check that your Line In is muted/disabled, in my case I had nothing connected to it but it still gave loads of static & feedback on my speakers.
I guess i shouldnt tell you that i got Wolfenstein TNO at 2.5K with 8x in game MSAA @ 60fps too, then..![]()