#GAMERGATE: The Threadening [Read the OP] -- #StopGamerGate2014

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have seen threads on gamergate places that are just full of people trashing neogaf, and someone posted earlier they saw an 8chan talking about attacking the site. It is really odd I don't get it either.

What are they saying? Why are they thrashing Neogaf?
 
Getting flown to an event to meet a deadline? That's impersonal. It doesn't add any expectations like a pre-existing relationship does.

A red carpet event isn't really an "impersonal event". They're catered, provided with alcoholic provisions and usually very lavishly treated. Some critics started refusing the special treatment (like roger ebert, who, surprise surprise, was harassed online by gamers for criticism of the medium), but why target underpaid critics when there are billion dollar industries that dangle proverbial carrots in front of them?
 
I love stuff like this, my favorite being the Extra Credits guys. This is why I support them, and Tropes vs Women, and others, so we get more of this type of content about games. The days where most of what you'd read about games were: Sound: 4/5, Controls 4/5, etc, those were the dark ages of gaming journalism IMO. That gamergate seems to push reviewers more and more in that direction is one reason I really dislike it.

This is ironic because the last video poops on Extra Credits pretty heavily. Dude's a /v/irgin through and through so there's snark all throughout but he makes an extremely good point.

Instig8ive also became e-famous with his Anita criticism videos which, while once again occasionally mean, do make good points.
 
I have seen threads on gamergate places that are just full of people trashing neogaf, and someone posted earlier they saw an 8chan talking about attacking the site. It is really odd I don't get it either.

What are they saying? Why are they thrashing Neogaf?

My guess is because users here aren't fitting into their narrative that GG is a force for journalistic integrity. They've aligned themselves against many individuals that have openly opposed corruption in the gaming industry for years simply because these people wouldn't ally with GG.
 
Fitting that #GAMERGATE supporters are trying to rally behind the video and people like Jennie Bharaj.

Since I'm entirely unfamiliar with her, what's her deal? She seemed to be purely reading off of a list of gamergate demands / talking points. And of course she also mentioned the bayonetta review thing, stating that all reviews need to be purely objective. Thankfully the host commented on how silly that was from the perspective of someone who loves films.

I would also like some clarification on why people would put Neogaf on that list. Is Neogaf the headquarter of anti-gg? How does that even work with it being an open forum?

Dunno, but GAF in general seems to be the target of a bunch of GG ire. I think a lot of them skim this thread and then get outraged, for whatever reason.
 
Wait, wait - the video is called "Does #GamerGate Have The Support Of Female Gamers?"

and they only got female GamerGaters to appear? WHAT?
 
I just read as a top story on the BBC that Anita had her talk at the Center for Women and Gender cancelled due to a threat promising a "massacre style attack". This makes me really deeply sad.

My partner is a gender specialist, and it's pretty tough these days to explain to her why the industry I work in has a fan base containing people who are doing this. It's also really deeply saddening. I appreciate the people here who are defending sanity, as honestly, the topic of misogyny and anti-feminism is very close to my personal life, and too difficult to talk about here without getting upset.
 
Publicize what? Is there some extremely secret and controversial thing NeoGAF is doing that will make this thread explode in screams and flames if it is revealed?

I'm sure by posting the tweets we would, in a roundabout way, be allowing banned users to post again.

as a matter of fact, i found that dead early guy that was banned yesterday by simply searching "neogaf" and "gamergate" on twitter!
 
How so? PM me if you don't want to go into it on the thread.

Downplaying the worth of those terms because you don't agree with how they're used, "we" perspective, downplaying that there are people to who those terms unequivocally apply, and pretty much removing minorities from the equation entirely
 
Well, I can't actually watch the video right now, but I'm looking at their Twitter feeds and seeing them make approving statements/retweets about Hotwheels, Sargon et al. If it walks like a duck...

Two of them stated in the interview that they were not feminists. I think the third said she was, but she wasn't a "radical" feminist, and was disgusted by what "SJW"s were doing.
 
Reading the comments here...

It makes me kind of happy...

To see normal people open the GG-ers eyes to how silly it sounds that Anita is a hoaxer. Don't you think the FBI would figure that out? Do you REALLY think she's that much of an evil mastermind that she would outsmart literally everyone but GG...? Including journalists, police, the FBI and the IRS...?

Ahhhhh...! Please snap out of this...
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

I mean if most people didn't have internalized misogyny we probably wouldn't need feminism.
 
Do you REALLY think she's that much of an evil mastermind that she would outsmart literally everyone but GG...? Including journalists, police, the FBI and the IRS...?

There are people who think Anita is working with DARPA. Soooo.... yeah. There are crazies out there who believe there's some elaborate ruse going on to undermine video games and the people that play them.
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

WTF are you even talking about,
no one even dared to sum up wtf this huffpost thing is about so clearly everyone know what you're talking about
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.
GamerGate is a hate movement. Anyone who actually cares about journalistic integrity or whatever should have fled this ship long ago.
 
Since I'm entirely unfamiliar with her, what's her deal? She seemed to be purely reading off of a list of gamergate demands / talking points. And of course she also mentioned the bayonetta review thing, stating that all reviews need to be purely objective. Thankfully the host commented on how silly that was from the perspective of someone who loves films.

I think what she is trying to say... to put in another example... Let's say a reviewer really dislikes homosexuality and purely based on that reason docks several points from games like Mass Effect 3 or Gone Home which portrays homosexuality positively, but then again digs everything else about the games. I also remember a controversy when Spore was out. A creationist butchered the game because it didn't fit with his creationist worldview. He got a lot of negative feedback for that review.


Dunno, but GAF in general seems to be the target of a bunch of GG ire. I think a lot of them skim this thread and then get outraged, for whatever reason.

So all the Neogaf hatred stems from this thread? That sounds really weird to me. Neogaf can't be responsible for their members viewpoints.
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

There's no pretence here. We're full on affirming that Gamergate is a hate movement. That's its origin, its greatest achievement was actively censoring outlets with opposing opinions and scare away and harass journalists and independent writers from the industry.
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

You're welcome to follow suit of the Gaters and leave to continue and trap yourselves in your own little bubble where you can echo whatever narrative you think is real. That right will always be welcomed to you.
 
Since I'm entirely unfamiliar with her, what's her deal? She seemed to be purely reading off of a list of gamergate demands / talking points. And of course she also mentioned the bayonetta review thing, stating that all reviews need to be purely objective. Thankfully the host commented on how silly that was from the perspective of someone who loves films.

I just heard about her today, as I was curious if the #GamerGate tag would bring up anything interesting on Twitter today, in light of the threats against Sarkeesian.

There are a ton of pro #GamerGate tweets about Jennie, saying she's a feminist female gamer who supports #GamerGate.

So I look her up, find her Youtube, and her 4 minute video on "Why you shouldn't worry about gender in video games". It can essentially be summarized with:

You shouldn't worry about gender in video games because:
-Gender inequality/representation are unavoidable in all mediums, so video games shouldn't be attacked alone
-1990s uproar over violent video games (Mortal Kombat) may be the root of gender inequality uproar
-Video games should be lauded for letting you play as men OR women (she incorrectly refers to this as "all genders")
-Men and women both play video games (she claims this puts all genders "on the same playing field", often together, so gender differences "hardly matter now"

Here is a rough transcript of some of her arguments:

"Now, when non-gamers think of video games, they think of the violent and sexual aspects first. However, in a study conducted, it was found that gamers and non-gamers held the same male and female stereotypes and gender-role associations. Therefore, gender roles in video games were insignificant."

"Most gamers feel the need to defend gender roles in video games, not because they think its right, but because those who accuse video games as negative mediums are more likely to go against video games as a whole. Therefore, gamers feel a need to defend video games."

Honestly, I don't understand how anyone can take issue with Anita's arguments/videos and yet also support Jennie's shallow stance.
 
Reality has an anti-gamergate bias. >__>

Trying to keep up with this thread is exhausting, but at least it keeps me informed on the latest happenings.

Hopefully when this whole thing causes gaming to hit rock bottom before it can recover, it isn't the kind that includes actual death, because it's already claimed the mental health of many people and their quality of life.
 
By the way, it's interesting to ask Gamer Gaters, "What is the worst case scenario in which a perceived journalistic lack of integrity affects you? What has happened to you or what are you fighting to stop?"

Usually you'll never get an answer.

Because the answer is "I might buy a video game someone says was good and it was actually not good"

I dunno, what if a Journalist with no integrity publicized a bunch of gossip about my sex life to manipulate a group of people into forming an organized hate campaign?

That would be pretty unethical.
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

Well, honestly I wish someone would report on it. But it's hard when things are still pretty skewed. :\ All I can do is wade through tweets and say sorry on behalf of those awful people on "my side."

However, misogyny is just a fancy word for hater. We all do it. It's just someone who hates women for specific things. Has nothing to do with self-loathing, it just has to do with being angry. Men hate men sometimes and women hate women sometimes, often for very specific things they denounce from their selves. If I hated on Kim Kardashian it would still be misogyny. If I hated on Bieber it would still be misandry. If I hated on everyone it would be misanthropy. It's a common thing that we all do, especially to prominent figures that we can project on. Hate is a natural, perfectly fine part of living. I wish people would understand that.

The best thing to do is understand where our hatred is coming from so we can better control it and solve problems. :)

Edit: oh. :C
 
I bet there are people who feel that, if 8-chan is GG's headquarters, NeoGAF is Anti-GG's headquarters.

hmmm...

7VKlj.png
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

Yup it's hate movement, it started as new tag for the Quinnspiracy hate movement courtesy of Adam Baldwin and later wore a cloak of those who were offended by LAs article (which was published a day after ABs tweet).
 
You're welcome to follow suit of the Gaters and leave to continue and trap yourselves in your own little bubble where you can echo whatever narrative you think is real. That right will always be welcomed to you.

As opposed to what's being done here where you focus on the actions of a small few and ignore the larger goal most people involved in gamer gate?
 
Downplaying the worth of those terms because you don't agree with how they're used, "we" perspective, downplaying that there are people to who those terms unequivocally apply, and pretty much removing minorities from the equation entirely

I don't think the terms should be downplayed; I think those words should continue to carry the strong negative connotation they have had historically. But I think their overuse in modern online communications is weakening / going to continue to weaken that connotation.

Not sure about the "we" perspective; Hell to quote a post a little below me "we should be damn proud of being seen as the anti-GG HQ." I don't think it is a far cry for me to say that the majority of people participating in this thread were either never fans of GG to begin with, or have been put off by the increasingly hostile and escalated levels of threats that folks choosing to associate themselves with GG have been doling out like candy to anyone (especially women) who dare say anything bad about GG. I might be wrong about that?

Heh, I had minorities in the post originally - but I'm convinced this has more to do about economics and class than race. Usually when you look at various statistics (education, health, etc), while there is usually a correlation between the statistic and other factors (race, location, parental education, etc); the strongest correlation usually always comes down to wealth. I tend to be a "follow the money" person more than anything.

Though I know for at least education; the racial correlation is stronger than the wealth correlation (rich black kids will score the same on tests as poor white kids, for instance) - and to me, that seems like a very strong indicator that there is some sort of systemic racism built into the whole damn process there. :(

Side Note: I also didn't want to start a whole derailing based on race; different topic for different time. I've become more and more cynical about progressive pushes in gaming because outside of sexism - I feel like race is basically ignored unless it is very egregious (see; Resident Evil); which is a large factor in why I believe this current push for a new viewpoint to look at games with is based more on economic factors rather than a genuine desire to do good (it can be both, mind you, and it's a good thing when social progress aligns with economic factors; it usually means that the progress actually gets done). But I very well realize that "follow the money" are my rose-colored goggles; and I'd be happy to know about more popular racial criticism of gaming in the last 10 months that is not located on a site that is devoted specifically to racial criticism (IE, more mainstream outlet based articles).

Someone mentioned a long time ago on this thread that they would do a KS about racial criticism similar to what Anita is doing. Even as someone who is not really hurt by racism (I'm Indian, so model minority ftw) comparatively speaking; I would pledge that HARD.
 
So you guys are still pretending GamerGate is a hate movement and ignoring the disgusting actions of the anti-GG crowd huh? I bet all three of those woman on Huffington Post also have internalized misogyny right?

What a joke this site has become.

Are there people still pretending it's anything but that? Because it's been shown time and time again that they're more concerned about someone daring to have an opinion about women in video games than anything about ethics.

Anyone making irrational threats to the GamerGate crowd are also bad. However they don't have a collective banner to say to them 'Hey, you guys are also being assholes. You don't have to tolerate their intolerance but making threats doesn't make you the better person either.'. If there was, then I'm certain most of the rational people arguing about this would be on board.
 
As opposed to what's being done here where you focus on the actions of a small few and ignore the larger goal most people involved in gamer gate?

No, we've been focusing on the actual goal of GG which is rooted in hate. The majority of us 100% support the fight for journalistic integrity. We just don't support GG because that's not what they're about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom