I don't think so. Also what was weird is one outlet gave it a high score so from that I'd say it is worth the risk...but maybe that was plan, allow an outlet to discredit themselves then make the consumer not trust the review.Did anything like this happen with '06?
Sega IS shipping out copies. Just late. They are sending them out today.
Does it really matter, though? I'd personally rather a reviewer buy the copy with no embargoes, restrictions or NDAs and all that bullshit and review the game for what it is. No strings attached, as it were.
If a publisher doesn't want to send a review copy, sure it doesn't really fill anyone with confidence, but it's their choice to make.
I'd rather live in a world were publishers stop sending out copies for review than a world were publishers attach a bunch of strings for the promise of early review copies.
What was the Assassin's Creed controversy?
Summary of all the reviews I've read so far:
![]()
haha that reminds me of my old trash game series from back in the day
![]()
haha that reminds me of my old trash game series from back in the day
![]()
haha that reminds me of my old trash game series from back in the day
![]()
WHATThey want to delay the 38 Metacritic score. Big Red Button are terrible. This is the first plaformer I ever played that does not save when you collect collectibles.
I think they said it on the Bombcast last week. Embargos day of release aren't too weird. It's when they don't send them at all that you know the publisher knows the game is crap.
It totally pissed me off because I collected a good chunk of crowns in the OW and I have to replay a mission.WHAT
That's awful.
They want to delay the 38 Metacritic score. Big Red Button are terrible. This is the first plaformer I ever played that does not save when you collect collectibles.
Generations. Damn good too, and it managed to mod Unleashed to not be trash.When was the last A+ sonic on a console?
did they release a version of NMH where you didn't have to trudge through the worst open driving experience ever in world history to get to places and missions? ;P
They want to delay the 38 Metacritic score. Big Red Button are terrible. This is the first plaformer I ever played that does not save when you collect collectibles.
People will buy this game for their children this Christmas.
Generations. Damn good too, and it managed to mod Unleashed to not be trash.
My man. I'm mad about A2 to this day.
Sonic & Knuckles. 1994.When was the last A+ sonic on a console?
I meant to say in a long while. The game plays like a B grade PSX platformer.There are probably some 90s platformers of n which that also happened. Still by modern gaming standards absolutely inexcusable.
Maybe not A+ then, but I'd firmly place it near at least B tier instead of shit tier like most Sonic games.Generations still wasn't A+ though. It was good but not great.
This is what I was trying to say. Review copies are nice, but they come with a lot of baggage. Not offering them just puts the press on the same level as normal consumers in some instances, which isn't exactly an atrocity; some people think that reviews would change for the better if the people writing them had to think about a game's value proposition the same way anyone else would.
To draw a parallel to another medium, some films aren't screened for critics. This tips a lot of people off to the fact that those films are probably junk that critics would hate, but it doesn't need to inspire the kinds of reactions we see in this thread; the same Universal Pictures that distributed the never-screened R.I.P.D also distributed Zero Dark Thirty. Doesn't make Universal a bunch of evil scumbags, just a big company that deals in a variety of different movies.
What the hell...NMH is a million times better than most other games.haha that reminds me of my old trash game series from back in the day
![]()
Sonic & Knuckles. 1994.
Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were great for their time, but not A+, not even A.
Generations came close.