Right. I can see how my post would look like that, but it's not really the case. I was jumping in the middle of a back and forth between two posters (my bad), specifically addressing this (bolded is mine):
So my initial response (to Hoo-doo, who was responding to Bgamer90) meant something along the lines of "Yeah, Titanfall may have been *artificially* pushed as the biggest game of the year but it was an untried/unknown property and in the end it didn't amount to much", which taken within the context of their ongoing discussion means I'm basically agreeing with Bgamer90: MCC, Assassin's Creed, CoD:AW are all bigger, more known IPs than Titanfall was.
So no, I'm not excusing Titanfall underperforming. I'm saying: This is the first one-two (three-four-five) punch Microsoft has had since it launched (Price drop, CoD/AC Bundles, MCC, etc). Please let me know if that clears up my post and its intention.