The Witcher |LTTP| Catching Up to the Wild Hunt

RDreamer

Member
Pd5E1i9.jpg


A long while ago I picked up The Witcher 2 on a whim. I needed something to play, and it looked pretty good and seemed to be recommended by quite a few people. I liked the game, but never actually ended up finishing it. It was sort of understandable without the foundation game, The Witcher, but I still felt like I was missing something. I really dislike jumping in the middle of a story. So, I put it aside and was distracted by other things.

As with probably everyone else in existence, The Witcher sat in my Steam Library for quite some time. I think I bought it for a buck fifty, perhaps two. Right now it sits at $10 dollars.

So, I just finished up with Dragon Age: Inquisition, and I was still in the mood for a bit of western RPG goodness. I had been planning on trying to buy Witcher 3 when that came out, despite not finishing 2 and never playing 3. I wouldn't have time to play those by February, W3's initial release date. But, it seems I was in luck! The Witcher 3 was delayed until May. So, I thought to myself, "Now's the perfect time for some Geralt Goodness!"

...and I tend to like playing games while seeing other people's reactions and talking to them about it, so I thought, "Perhaps now is also the perfect time for a Witcher LTTP thread!"

Here it is, NeoGAF! It's time to grab your two swords, mix some potions, get a little drunk, maybe find a girl with a flashy card, and hack and slash our way to the release of Witcher 3: Wild Hunt!


Kg5RAEv.jpg


The Witcher:

Made by Polish developer CD Projekt RED, The Witcher game is based on the book series of the same name by Polish author Andrzej Sapkowski. It's an RPG that throws you into the role one of the few remaining Witchers. His name is Geralt of Rivia, and hunting monsters is his game. He's got a bit of a dry sense of humor and two blades; one is for fighting humans and one is for fighting monsters... oh, and he apparently just lost his memory! No, wait, come back, I swear it's good!

The game starts with a pretty brilliant intro cutscene. After that, you're found and taken to Kaer Morhen, an old Witcher stronghold. The game proper starts with an attack. You, your faithful sorceress Triss Merigold, and a few other Witchers must fight off a group of bandits called Salamandra. They're lead by a mage named Azar Javed.

Your quest, Witcher, is to seek out Salamandra, and find out exactly why they broke in and what they want with all your mutagens.

The combat is a sort of rhythmic mini-game. You choose different stances based on whether you're fighting a quicker opponent, someone bigger, or a lot of enemies. You also get two swords, one for fighting humans and another for monsters. Alchemy and potions are a big part of this game, too. You can up your recovery rate, add damage, or even slow down time to up your parry rate through the roof. Honestly, the combat's not the best, but it seems to get the job done well enough.

The rest of the gameplay is very old-school RPG. There are branching paths, depending on how you figure out the quest leads. I'm on Chapter 2 and a lot of it is almost adventure game-like. This chapter in particular is a straight up detective story. You've got to find leads and check out suspects. Lots of dialogue. It's honestly getting a bit tedious, in a way, but I'm still hanging in there and digging it. I think if you expect a lot of combat or something it's not going to satisfy. At least so far. I was also expecting some of the pacing of Witcher 2, since I played that first, and it's pretty different.

1Dp6OSu.jpg


The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings:

Events of The Witcher lead right into The Witcher 2: Assassin of Kings. As the intro cutscene shows, and the title clearly hints at, kings are being assassinated, and Geralt is a suspect. After being let out of prison by a man named Vernan Roche, you set out on a quest to find this kingslayer.

Combat has been tweaked for Witcher 2. It's much more action-based. You can choose faster, weak attacks, or stronger, slower ones. They also added the ability to lay traps and to aim and throw ranged weapons. You can still use potions, much like the first game.

It's been a while since I played it, but the pacing was a lot quicker than the first Witcher. Dare I say it's a bit more mainstream? It still has some big choices and branching paths. I believe you can get pretty different chapters depending on who you side with, so that's pretty cool.

I'm unsure of whether I can or should play Witcher 2 on my Macbook when I get there or on the 360 like I did the first time. I think either way I'll try and use a controller. It'll probably depend on if anything at all carries over from the first game.

1igMgP3.jpg


Witcher 3: Wild Hunt:

Apparently this game is huge. They're bragging it's 30 times larger than previous Witcher games, and 20% bigger than Skyrim. It's also a very pretty game. There's a pretty great trailer here and a 35 minute gameplay demo here. I'm excited. You're excited. Nearly everyone's excited.


So, what's your thoughts on the series? Are you replaying it before Witcher 3 comes out?

Please use spoiler tags (and mark which game).
 
I re-watched the 37 min gameplay footage of TW3 after having just completed DA:I. Man, that demo was on a completely different level. The dialogue, the art style, even the way the camera moves and cutscenes are framed. I know it's a well-curated demo, but if the final product is anywhere close to that quality, we're in for a real treat.
 
Witcher 1 is way too long to replay. I beat Witcher 2 like 3x and figured I should check out the first game, earlier this year. Great game but man it took me like 90 hours and there's a lot of backtracking. Worth playing through.
 
I started Witcher 1 this holiday but only sank like 3 hours into it. The pace of this game is something else, I'm barely past the prologue. I'm also lost since they throw you into a huge map right from the get-go and I don't really know which places are worth exploring. Hopefully I can power through Witcher 1 and 2 before 3 comes out though.
 
Witcher 1 is way too long to replay. I beat Witcher 2 like 3x and figured I should check out the first game, earlier this year. Great game but man it took me like 90 hours and there's a lot of backtracking. Worth playing through.

I feel like I'm doing a lot of running back and forth in town. I'm like "Oh, I need to go see what's her face over there." Then I do that and oh hey I have to go back to the other side and then oh hey I need to make it night and get back somewhere else. I can definitely see this taking a long while.

I started Witcher 1 this holiday but only sank like 3 hours into it. The pace of this game is something else, I'm barely past the prologue. I'm also lost since they throw you into a huge map right from the get-go and I don't really know which places are worth exploring. Hopefully I can power through Witcher 1 and 2 before 3 comes out though.

Basically: Explore everything. That seems to be what I got so far. You actually need to in order to figure out a lot of the leads. Some random book somewhere or something could be the clue you need. It's kind of crazy. Chapter 1 is pretty manageable, though. Just look in your journal, pick a quest and go there. Chapter 2 gets reeeeeeeeaaaaaallly crazy with intertwining quests. That's the thing is that both chapters all the quests are pretty much the same quest.

My favorite RPG series. The world and setting are very immersive.

The world does seem really cool, though I wish you didn't have to buy all the books to get lore. In a way it's kind of cool, but in a way it's still annoying.

Also after coming off of Dragon Age it's kind of crazy keeping everything straight in my mind, lore-wise.
 
I started Witcher 1 this holiday but only sank like 3 hours into it. The pace of this game is something else, I'm barely past the prologue. I'm also lost since they throw you into a huge map right from the get-go and I don't really know which places are worth exploring. Hopefully I can power through Witcher 1 and 2 before 3 comes out though.

Just stick with the main story quests if you want to power through it. The side quests are really well done IMO, and offer quite interesting stories, but they can take a long time.
 
Just stick with the main story quests if you want to power through it. The side quests are really well done IMO, and offer quite interesting stories, but they can take a long time.

I'm in Chapter 2 and so far it's been pretty hard figuring out what's actually a side quest and what isn't. Seems like everything is intertwined in some way.
 
I just started playing through The Witcher 2 a couple days ago to get ready for the 3rd game. I really like pretty much everything about the game except the combat but I think I will still make it through the game in spite of that. I hope the combat is seriously improved for the sequel though.
 
I'm in Chapter 2 and so far it's been pretty hard figuring out what's actually a side quest and what isn't. Seems like everything is intertwined in some way.

Yeah that's true, there's this big investigation in chapter 2 that forces you to look everywhere. After that it becomes easier to discern what's a side quest and what isn't
 
I moved shortly into the swamp area in The Witcher 2 and no longer have access to a PC. May end up having to settle for the GWG version coming out on the 16th. Wasn't too thrilled with how potions were handled, but I probably needed to spend more time with the game.

The Witcher took a long time to get going to where it was hard to care what was going on initially, but when it does get going it's quite good. Combat was fine and more sensible than roll and run all over the place in combat that seemed to be The Witcher 2.
 
Yeah that's true, there's this big investigation in chapter 2 that forces you to look everywhere. After that it becomes easier to discern what's a side quest and what isn't

That's good to hear. As much as Chapter 2 is pretty cool, a whole game of that would be kind of tiring.
 
I completed Witcher 1 roughly a week ago. It's a great game that i feel is a bit too long. The game ends strongly. My advice is to not force yourself to complete all the side quest especially the contract quests, just power through the main story.
 
I've played several hours of the first game a few years ago and haven't touched it since. The combat was not satisfying at all to me so I never got sucked into the game. Is the second worth playing?
 
From what I've read so far, it's a long game. But according to this HLTB site, it's around 40-ish hours long. Is it accurate?

I've yet to play the Witcher 1 and I really have to before The Wild Hunt arrives.
 
From what I've read so far, it's a long game. But according to this HLTB site, it's around 40-ish hours long. Is it accurate?

I've yet to play the Witcher 1 and I really have to before The Wild Hunt arrives.

Seems to be an overestimate. I beat it in ~29 hours according to steam. As far as I know I didn't skip much, I do remember doing a lot of exploring. The combat sucks but the story is solid. If you can get over the bad combat in the first Witcher I highly recommend it.

I just started playing through The Witcher 2 a couple days ago to get ready for the 3rd game. I really like pretty much everything about the game except the combat but I think I will still make it through the game in spite of that. I hope the combat is seriously improved for the sequel though.

I was like that having played Dark Souls right before The Witcher 2. It made the combat feel poor but once I played it a bit things got easier. Just keep the shield spell up (upgrading it helps a lot too) then dodge after a few attacks. It doesn't make it super enjoyable but its decent enough. Once you level up a bit things become easier as well.
 
I've played several hours of the first game a few years ago and haven't touched it since. The combat was not satisfying at all to me so I never got sucked into the game. Is the second worth playing?

Combat in 2 from what I recall:

Potions have to be consumed before/after combat.

Combat is real time with light, heavy, and counters/ripostes.

To avoid damage, rolling is introduced. You'll spend most of your combat in TW2 doing so from what I recall.

Signs (powers) are streamlined for offense and trapping.

I think there are regular traps and bombs too, can't remember.

Didn't make it far enough in to know how much variety there was. Seemed somewhat decent from the tutorial arena challenge.

It's probably going to be much easier for you to get into, but it was IMO far from perfect.
 
Seems to be an overestimate. I beat it in ~29 hours according to steam. As far as I know I didn't skip much, I do remember doing a lot of exploring. The combat sucks but the story is solid. If you can get over the bad combat in the first Witcher I highly recommend it.

It took me 49 hours according to Steam and i was rushing through the last 2 chapters.

Seems complicated. I guess it's around 30-50 hours then, according to our pace. I'm kinda a slow gamer.

Has anyone tried the Combat Rebalance Mod for the first Witcher? With or without Rise of the White Wolf?

Ah, mods, yeah.
Any recommended mods for this one?
 
Seems complicated. I guess it's around 30-50 hours then, according to our pace. I'm kinda a slow gamer.



Ah, mods, yeah.
Any recommended mods for this one?

Yeah, I wish I could give a more accurate reason as to why it only took me 29 hours. I played it mid-last year so I don't really remember what I did entirely but I do remember doing side quests, didn't skip conversations or anything. Strange there's such a drastic difference in times.
 
I re-watched the 37 min gameplay footage of TW3 after having just completed DA:I. Man, that demo was on a completely different level. The dialogue, the art style, even the way the camera moves and cutscenes are framed. I know it's a well-curated demo, but if the final product is anywhere close to that quality, we're in for a real treat.

Yeah, I'm playing throuhg DA:I right now myself and the only thing I keep thinking is "Fuck I can't wait to play Witcher 3"
 
I'm considering replaying the first one since it's been 6 years at this point. I remember preferring the first game after I beat the second.
 
I got through chapter 1 and 2 of the Witcher before I pulled up this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHwa-7LBfV4

Witcher 2 though, played both paths (skimped on sidequests my second time through though).

Praying for remotely interesting combat in Witcher 3.

Yeah, it at least looks like a massive step up from Witcher 2. Geralt's movements are much more fluid.

My biggest worry is all the boasting about "100hrs+!!" Personally, I have never played a single player game for that long that wasn't just padded with a ton of menial and rote ass content that detracts from everything else in the game. Being that this is their first "open world" I could totally see them falling into the trap of needing to fill the world with stuff.
 
This post does not contain spoilers.

Some criticisms of Witcher 1 include a lot of running back-and-forth (eats up a lot of time) as well as uninspired locales.
 
The original took me about 45 hours, probably could have stretched it out another 5-10 hours if I wanted to. Fleecing people while playing dice is always fun. It's probably not for everyone to be honest (act 2 is a pain in the butt in particular), but I enjoyed it a lot.
 
Yeah, I wish I could give a more accurate reason as to why it only took me 29 hours. I played it mid-last year so I don't really remember what I did entirely but I do remember doing side quests, didn't skip conversations or anything. Strange there's such a drastic difference in times.

Yeah I think my time is a lot longer due to running around in circles in chapter 2. I remember finding out that some of the side quests in that chapter can only proceed if you were further in the main storyline quest. Also played a lot of dice and the fist fights.
 
For people that just want to get through the game for the sake of getting through the game before Witcher 3 comes out, I suggest skipping the side quests. Right before Witcher 2 came out, I decided to do a quick run through of Witcher 1, and I found out most of the backtracking, especially in the swamp, were from side missions, not the main quest.
 
Loved both games. Really dig the dark fantasy world and the characters/story. It's all just so well crafted and detailed.
Gameplay has never been anything amazing, but it serves its purpose.
The third game is easily my most anticipated title of 2015.
 
For people that just want to get through the game for the sake of getting through the game before Witcher 3 comes out, I suggest skipping the side quests. Right before Witcher 2 came out, I decided to do a quick run through of Witcher 1, and I found out most of the backtracking, especially in the swamp, were from side missions, not the main quest.

Will I get gimped if I skipped those long side quests? I mean, how about the rewards?
Any notable side quests that are skippable?
 
Played both on easy and did every quest I could for all dem juicy witcher 3 references.

Witcher 1 was a bit of a chore, 2 was solid but dragged at certain parts.

Will I get gimped if I skipped those long side quests? I mean, how about the rewards?
Any notable side quests that are skippable?

If it's any help, I did pretty much 99 percent of everything in Witcher 1, my time played in steam is 36 hours. So I guess use that for reference. That's on easy.
 
Has anyone played TW2 on both PC and 360? I'll likely be starting over on the GWG freebie and just want to know, outside of visuals/performance, if there are any sort of concessions, features, or quirks I should keep in mind with making the transition to the 360.
 
For people that just want to get through the game for the sake of getting through the game before Witcher 3 comes out, I suggest skipping the side quests. Right before Witcher 2 came out, I decided to do a quick run through of Witcher 1, and I found out most of the backtracking, especially in the swamp, were from side missions, not the main quest.

I'd say people ought to decide for themselves -- dip their toes into the water and see if the side-quests are interesting enough to pursue. Personally, I completed everything the game had to offer and didn't find the backtracking offensive at all, but the swamp in particular is definitely a rather common area of contention.
 
I need to play 2 sometime. Hopefully in a few months, and then I can play 3.

I've played the first one and enjoyed the way the game progressed for the most part. The battle system never made a lot of sense to me until much later when I realized that making potions is where it's at!

In any case, focus on that and have fun.
 
Op. Good luck with witcher 1. I had started that game at least 5 times over the years until last year, I put my heels into it and finished it within a month. Think it was a bit over 30 hours. Takes a lot of effort to get reeled back in but it was totally worth it. Love soaking in the witcher world, even read the first novel after completing the first game. I'm about half way through witcher 2 now and hoping to complete that before witcher 3 release date.
 
I like how different, story-wise, TW1 and 2 feels: one its almost a noir-detective story, while the latter is more of a GoT. I like both in equal measure.

Gameplay was definitely better in 2.

Oh, and TW1 has the worst italian dub ever.

Can't friggin wait for The Wild Hunt, i just hope they make a great PS4 port.
 
Op. Good luck with witcher 1. I had started that game at least 5 times over the years until last year, I put my heels into it and finished it within a month. Think it was a bit over 30 hours. Takes a lot of effort to get reeled back in but it was totally worth it. Love soaking in the witcher world, even read the first novel after completing the first game. I'm about half way through witcher 2 now and hoping to complete that before witcher 3 release date.

Yeah, I'm liking the lore so far. As I said before, my only gripe is that I have to pay in-game money in order to actually open up world lore. It's an interesting mechanic, but that makes it kind of annoying when I don't know whether I should spend on that or not.

How was the novel?

Can't friggin wait for The Wild Hunt, i just hope they make a great PS4 port.

Yeah, I'm hoping so, too. I'm playing Witcher 1 on my Macbook and it runs great. I haven't tried Witcher 2, but I'm skeptical on that running quite as well. Witcher 3 won't have a Mac port for a while, so I'm stuck with PS4. Well, not stuck since I usually prefer consoles.
 
Coincidentally enough, i've started playing The Witcher yesterday and i'm really enoying it so far. Just arrived at the first Inn at The Outskirts. It feels a bit clunky at times but there's a very intruiging, thick atmosphere and the story's already pretty interesting.

I plan on playing both games as a preperation for The Wild Hunt, which is looking incredible. I've played some of The Witcher 2 a couple of times before but it never really grabbed me. Made it up to Flotsam last time. Very pretty, but I wasn't in the mood I guess.
I'm not a big fan of political fantasy hoo-ha and that game's beginning has a lot of it, and a big lore dump I didn't really get, so there's that.
 
Are there some good cheats for this one, I just wanna play my way through the story without spending too much time with upgrading things or looking up a full cutscene video.
 
I really like both games. The first game is more atmospheric and tells a captivating story. It's slowly paced, but I never thought it was boring. I hated the swamps though. The second game's combat is leagues better, but I felt like too many plotlines were unresolved while Witcher 1 tied up everything pretty well. I would say Witcher 2 is the better game, but there's a lot from W1 that wasn't represented in W2.
 
Most people complain about the swamp, but chapter 4 is where I put the game down. I got so stuck there. Eventually went back and finished it though.
 
I like how different, story-wise, TW1 and 2 feels: one its almost a noir-detective story, while the latter is more of a GoT. I like both in equal measure.

Gameplay was definitely better in 2.

Oh, and TW1 has the worst italian dub ever.

Can't friggin wait for The Wild Hunt, i just hope they make a great PS4 port.

TW1 pretty much follows the early Witcher titles where Geralt strictly kept to The Path, that's the only one so far that lets you stay neutral as Witchers are supposed to. 2 and 3 seems to go further and further into the rabbit hole Geralt inevitably gets pulled into as he can no long stay neutral due to circumstances.
 
From what I've read so far, it's a long game. But according to this HLTB site, it's around 40-ish hours long. Is it accurate?

I've yet to play the Witcher 1 and I really have to before The Wild Hunt arrives.
I did every quest and explored a lot in 36 hours according to Steam. It was my 2nd playthrough though so I knew what to do.

Edit: Oh, and chapter 4 is a masterpiece, its glorious!
 
Was all excited to play it, but I can't get The Witcher: EE to start. It boots up for a split-second, then immediately quits before showing any kind of screen. This is on Windows 8. Tried the -dontForceMinReqs fix, but it doesn't help.

Not sure what to do.
 
Was all excited to play it, but I can't get The Witcher: EE to start. It boots up for a split-second, then immediately quits before showing any kind of screen. This is on Windows 8. Tried the -dontForceMinReqs fix, but it doesn't help.

Not sure what to do.

What are your specs.
 
Top Bottom