Sony announces 18.5 million PlayStation 4 consoles sold WW

I'm not sure (I'm only a data base programmer).

From the responses i've got it (here and here) it seems like GPGPU is highly situational and heavy on the GPU and will probably only be used for simulations like particles.

There are plenty of caveats when working on GPGPU code, but you don't have to have 100% efficiency for it to still be a win wrt frame times.
 
Good on Sony, looks like PS4 will dominate this gen and probably hit 80m easily.

Now they just need to invest that into more games and exclusives.

PS4 is on Wii numbers (over PS2) until now but unlike it still didn't released any major exclusives. PS4 will sell way more than 80 million specially if WiiU and XBO doesn't make something that boost permanently their sales (big price drops, buy major publishers).

For this year there are exclusives announced like Uncharted, The Order, Bloodborne, No Man's Sky, Rime, Persona, multiplatform games like Metal Gear, The Witcher 3, Evolve, Batman, AC or The Division and console exclusive from important indies like Devolver, Jonathan Blow or the creators or Dear Esther to name a few.

And for later we also know there's stuff coming from Sony like GT7, a new GoW, TLG and new IPs from Guerrilla, Quantic Dream, Media Molecule, Bend or Sony Japan. Plus other exclusive games like Street Fighter V.

The first year may have been light in terms of exclusives and high quality games, but this won't last. In any case, PS4 sold has a tie ratio of 4.42 games per console, an insane number more typical of mid generation than from a year after release. So maybe you didn't like the game released these year, but the people who owned a PS4 bought an average of more than 4 games.
 
Ah ok, cloth simulation is a series of calculations better suited for a GPU type processor I guess then? Do you think we ever saw what the cell could do as a CPU as it seemed that most of the time it was held back by having to support the GPU.

No idea. There are things a CPU should be good at like branch prediction which was terrible on Cell.
 
The current topic appears to be that the CPU is the limiting factor (Ubi had a software demo showing the PS3 cell was quicker than the PS4 CPU) until devs properly get used to using the GPU for additional calcs. Back in the PS3 days the cell CPU used to help out the graphics chip a lot once devs figured out how to use it, the situation will be reversed this time around.
This demo was from the AC Unity guys, a game that unlikely the other AAA devs in this gen struggled with major performance issues.

Stuff like cloth simulation can be done in the way faster GPU to avoid this issue. CPU isn't a bottleneck specially in PS4, at least for the other AAA devs.

Chû Totoro;146175275 said:
total software sales anyone?
81.8 million, attach rate of 4.42 games/console.
 
The PS4 is the first sony console I have bought. Always done PC/Nintendo but since moving into my tiny apartment i couldn't spare the extra space.
Very happy with my PS4 and stoked that they are doing well.
 
PS3 at least had Uncharted, Folklore, Resistance, and Motorstorm in its first year. PS4 is the worst lineup in Playstation History no joke.

Killzone shadowfall, Resogun, Infamous second son (and first light), The Last of Us Remastered, Driveclub, Littlebigplanet 3 is, in my view, a better line up than what you posted.

Additionally all the multiplat and indie games on PS4 are better than the technically poor multiplats that ps3 had in its first year.
 
More than that now, according to a statement on November 12th they will have soon shipped over 10 million. I imagine the Christmas sales gave a huge spike.

http://news.xbox.com/2014/11/xbox-one-sales-on-the-rise

That's the problem with that announcement, though. "Soon" could have meant anything at that point. It could have meant after the holiday season. Hell, it could have even meant that they planned on having 10 million shipped to retailers after stuffing the shit out of the channel. We have no idea based on that quote.

I'm not saying I think that's true, I'm just saying they were being purposely vague. We'll have to wait until they announce their next milestone.
 
That's the problem with that announcement, though. "Soon" could have meant anything at that point. It could have meant after the holiday season. Hell, it could have even meant that they planned on having 10 million shipped to retailers after stuffing the shit out of the channel. We have no idea based on that quote.

I'm not saying I think that's true, I'm just saying they were being purposely vague. We'll have to wait until they announce their next milestone.

People take this "10M" as granted, but we do know that they shipped 7.x units at the end of their last published report (end of September), so it's extremely unlikely that they were actually all that close to 10M when that news was published. It was likely a projection including the entire holiday season.
 
81.8 million....holy shit that jump.

360:

Software (excluding XBL) : 55.12 million
Hardware: 10.4 million
Tie Ratio (excluding XBL) : 5.3

PS4's user base is expanding at a rapid rate is a major reason for the lower tie ratio. Still impressive software sales.

A smaller user base means higher tie ratio. The early adopters are people who are hardcore. I'm guessing people who picked up a PS4 at launch (or near launch) have a higher tie ratio than those who pick one up during Black Friday or get one for Christmas.
 
81.8 million....holy shit that jump.

360:

Software (excluding XBL) : 55.12 million
Hardware: 10.4 million
Tie Ratio (excluding XBL) : 5.3

PS4's user base is expanding at a rapid rate is a major reason for the lower tie ratio. Still impressive software sales.



I want a VC4 on PS4....SEGA pls give the series another chance

Do we have just numbers for retail titles on 360? PS4 number is retail + download, so it isn't a completely fair comparison.

But, to be honest, I don't remember if XBL was already big enough in 2006 (right) to influence overall numbers that much.
 
God I feel old.
Remember the first year or so of the Wii, really felt involved with it all, knew loads of people who had one / were trying to get one, seemed to be an "important" story.

But PS4 has, buy the sounds of it, sold only 2 mil less in it's first year, but I've heard nowt about it, I know nobody who had got one and it has all just passed me by.

Same here. As far as I know, the PS4 sales are all a lie and I'm the only person in the world who owns one...
 
For a console with not that much exclusives (that goes for X1 as well, only WiiU has an impressive library of quality exclusive games), it's pretty impressive. Then again, I'm not surprised. Microsoft shot themselves in the foot beginning of the generation. Congrats Sony!
Not according to the majority of gamers. It's ridiculous that people are still saying this.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.
Citation needed.
 
The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.
Kinda funny considering it was mostly Americans complaining about the Plus offerings on the GAF Plus topic in 2013/2014, compared to happy Europeans.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

I'm French and I have always been very happy about PS+. There are satisfied and unsatisfied people everywhere, not sure how it's supposed to be a USA vs ROTW matter
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

PS+ costs $50 a year.
 
For what its worth, Sony has very likely contributed to that mindset with heavily pushing AAA games like God of War and Uncharted, while leaving the middleground dead (hey Wipeout).
It doesn't come out of nowhere.

Middleground? PS4 being the leading console for all indies alike. Isn't that the current middleground and underground? PS4 has it all covered.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

Show me the receipts.gif
 
Middleground? PS4 being the leading console for all indies alike. Isn't that the current middleground and underground? PS4 has it all covered.

No, indies are not middleground. A few higher budget indie titles are similar to the AA games of old but most are not. Plus you can get them all on steam and even a toaster can run them.
 
Kinda funny considering it was mostly Americans complaining about the Plus offerings on the GAF Plus topic in 2013/2014, compared to happy Europeans.

That's because Americans likely have multi-sub > 5+ from tons of services. Hell I've heard they have to subscribe the GPS map.

EU likely have very few of them - Netflex, Amazon, maybe and local one.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

As someone hailing from the great nation of europia, I have no contempt for PS+ what so ever. It's a great deal wherever you are.... Except maybe the countries that don't get the bang bang violent shoot games from it.
 
The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

Yeah no, it has nothing to do with being an american or not. A lot of people are PS+ members here in France, it's just cheap, you pay 6€ for a month and you get access to several games. They were just to greedy when they put the Vita cloud safe and the Ps4 multiplayer behind paywall.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

I'm British and love PS+. I agree the "free games" comments don't make much sense, but I'd definitely say the service as a whole is a fantastic value for money. Microsoft set the standard with Live last gen, locking multiplayer behind a paywall for server upkeep costs and what-have-you. Sony have just said "We'll match that, and you can download some games every month on top."

I'm fine with that. I pay yearly, so the cost is low. I get a fantastic online network that allows me to play with friends and family, share images and videos, stream games, watch low-priced movies, get regular discounts on purchases, all with zero hassle unlike last-gen (DDOS attacks not-withstanding). I'm fine paying a small amount each year for that upkeep, and the monthly games just sweeten the deal even more. Without income from PS+, I doubt they could keep the network running so smoothly.
 
No, indies are not middleground. A few higher budget indie titles are similar to the AA games of old but most are not. Plus you can get them all on steam and even a toaster can run them.

So tell me what are the "middleground" games then. I've thought they're the "indies" like it has been for 30 years now. Games like No Man's Sky, Remember Me, Journey, Rime, FEZ and so on.
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

As much as a i love Gabe, he doesn't speak for all of europe in his contempt of PS+
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

Australian here and i love PS+. Can confirm you have no idea what you're talking about and do not speak for "the rest of the world".
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

What on earth are you smoking... ? EuroGAF has always been very happy with PS+ offering afaik. I know I am, as well as nearly everyone I know around me that actually play video games... Even if I think it's somehow declining, I still believe it is a GREAT offer.

And BTW, what does this have to do with anything ?
 
I just wanted to chime in and point out some of the disbelief over how many people ACTUALLY have PS+. There was some concerning comments about that earlier in this thread...

...Not everyone thinks PS+ is a bargain, or a great value. There are plenty who think the PS3 was the better console last gen because multiplayer was still free. There's also still a lot of happy PS3 owners in general.

For many across the world, PS+ was never perceived to be the 'value' many Americans believe it to be. Americans pay $60 a year and think they're getting free stuff... The rest of the world looks at it is, "Uh, free stuff? Um, can we have the drugs those guys are sniffing, because you're clearly not getting free stuff... and your value decreases with each and every month that goes by when you're not downloading a game you'd actually want..."

Throwing multiplayer behind a pay wall on the PS4 isn't helping matters of perception around the world, either.

The United States does NOT equal the rest of the world. PS+ was always held with some contempt everywhere else.

I am American but I do somewhat agree with this. My issue with PS+ is that its a good service for those who want it. People always try to justify Sony putting Multiplayer behind a pay wall by saying you're getting a value that's worth more than your sub, but that's only true if you actually want the games you get from PS+. I rarely buy games from the PS store and even if I do download the "free" games I'am only downloading them because they are free, not necessarily because I'd like to play them. To me if PS+ was truly the value people say it was, Sony wouldn't have had put multiplayer behind the pay wall.
 
tumblr_mik1jkSZ761qftu09o1_250.gif


Jesus Christ, 18.5 million in a year... That's impressive!
 
Top Bottom