I agree although it probably won't happen because Japan loves their schoolgirls :/
yeah, what's up with the Ken hate? He was clearly designed to be Ryu's polar opposite and best friend. Stoic, strong, focused, hard hitting vs. care-free, charismatic, witty, fast-paced. Even though I main Ken in every game, always felt like a Yin/Yang type of situation to me, cant imagine a game without both of them. No offense to Akuma peeps, but I don't think he's necessary in every game. Too many boss characters in Sf4 IMO.Dat hardcore wishful thinking.
All the more reason to charge them for the classic Sakura outfit DLC.
I dislike Ken mostly because I don't really care for characters like Ken who though play differently from their counterparts, it's mostly because of frame data differences, and if we do indeed have a more tight roster then that's a fucking lazy choice.yeah, what's up with the Ken hate? He was clearly designed to be Ryu's polar opposite and best friend. Stoic, strong, focused, hard hitting vs. care-free, charismatic, witty, fast-paced. Even though I main Ken in every game, always felt like a Yin/Yang type of situation to me, cant imagine a game without both of them. No offense to Akuma peeps, but I don't think he's necessary in every game. Too many boss characters in Sf4 IMO.
Sean plays differently enough from Ryu/Ken while having enough similarities. Put him in over Ken.
What? Crimson Viper & Juri were awesome.I just hope the (4) new characters are better than IV's.
*shudders*
What? Crimson Viper & Juri were awesome.
I just hope the (4) new characters are better than IV's.
*shudders*
What? Crimson Viper & Juri were awesome.
So with the inclusion of Charlie I guess that means it takes place before SF3 since I guess Remy won't be needed? Although I'd love to be wrong... but damn, the SF series has been stuck chronologically in the 90's forever now.
C. Viper still counts.Likely meaning the new chars in OG SFIV, so C. Viper/Abel/Rufus/El Fuerte?
C. Viper still counts.
Story wise she doesn't really do much, and the rest are total shit (even though I love El Fuerte, I recognize how bad he is).
Or just make Ken play differently. I'd love to see a combo heavy, rushdown friendly Ken. That style would fit the character really well. Having Ryu without Ken is like having Scorpion without Sub Zero.Sean plays differently enough from Ryu/Ken while having enough similarities. Put him in over Ken.
I really couldn't give a shit about the story. Out of all the game genres, it applies to fighting games, and other primarily head-to-head multiplayer games the most.
I understand that mind-set. but I post on other forums and even sometimes outside of Shoryuken Ken section, people tend to hate KEN specifically. There's like 4 other shotos (Gouki, Dan, Sakura, Sean) and then you have E. Ryu, another version of Gouki, etc...None get as much hate as Ken. Something else is up here IMO.I dislike Ken mostly because I don't really care for characters like Ken who though play differently from their counterparts, it's mostly because of frame data differences, and if we do indeed have a more tight roster then that's a fucking lazy choice.
But in a way, that means he's a good candidate for this game since they're going to make characters more unique. Give him more kick stuff, make him more flame-y visually, create his own thing instead of being like "uhh his fireball has more recovery but travels faster"
Likely meaning the new chars in OG SFIV, so C. Viper/Abel/Rufus/El Fuerte?
Likely meaning the new chars in OG SFIV, so C. Viper/Abel/Rufus/El Fuerte?
C. Viper is meh to me. Abel and Rufus are pretty bad/boring and Rufus might be the worst SF character ever.
I'm mostly talking about character design, not playstyles.
Juri and Gouken I have no problem with.
couldn't agree more. I was on every Capcom forum and Q/A asking for Crazy Kicks and Roll back in SF4. The Ken community was looking for the 3rd strike version of Ken and had to fight and claw just to get a f'n equal walk speed -_-Or just make Ken play differently. I'd love to see a combo heavy, rushdown friendly Ken. That style would fit the character really well. Having Ryu without Ken is like having Scorpion without Sub Zero.
which is bad.bad at what? all four of them are anti fundamental characters
That was Sean. Remove fireball, keep dp, add Command roll, low profile tackle that could be feinted with super low recovery, wheel kick overhead.Or just make Ken play differently. I'd love to see a combo heavy, rushdown friendly Ken. That style would fit the character really well. Having Ryu without Ken is like having Scorpion without Sub Zero.
That was Sean. Remove fireball, keep dp, add Command roll, low profile tackle that could be feinted with super low recovery, wheel kick overhead.
Sean went from being a monster in Second Impact to being gutter trash in Third Strike.
Losing his link to super really hurt him, also, didn't he get a new upper?
all his crouch normals were shoto, just really bad frame data in 3sHis Dragon Punch changed completely. THE only shoto moves he has in 3s is a super fireball and a Shoryu variant (with a couple of normals) I would take him over Ken any day of the week.
I dislike Ken mostly because I don't really care for characters like Ken who though play differently from their counterparts, it's mostly because of frame data differences, and if we do indeed have a more tight roster then that's a fucking lazy choice.
But in a way, that means he's a good candidate for this game since they're going to make characters more unique. Give him more kick stuff, make him more flame-y visually, create his own thing instead of being like "uhh his fireball has more recovery but travels faster"
It makes me sad that we will probably never see Hakan in a SF again.
That's what having different frame data means. He has for the most part the same normals and specials, they just behave differently because of their frame data and hence he plays differently.I understand that mind-set. but I post on other forums and even sometimes outside of Shoryuken Ken section, people tend to hate KEN specifically. There's like 4 other shotos (Gouki, Dan, Sakura, Sean) and then you have E. Ryu, another version of Gouki, etc...None get as much hate as Ken. Something else is up here IMO.
Is it because he's another flavor of Ryu or something? I just don't understand it, he's been around since the inception of the break-out game, how do you take him out when he's almost as equal as the poster boy for the franchise? Every ranking he's right below Ryu and in some even higher. Player Data he's always one of the top played characters, his infamous "flowchart" for SF4 was due to his popularity with casuals.
Something else is going on here besides "he plays too similar to Ryu". lol...and his differences in SF4 is not just frame data. You can hardly do the classic zone/AA game with Ken in the last game. His style is based off kara throw/step kick/mix-up. Ryu plays more similar to Guile or Gouken.
It makes me sad that we will probably never see Hakan in a SF again.
It makes me sad that we will probably never see Hakan in a SF again.
If it really didn't matter, then they wouldn't have bothered to put any history to the game since Fighter Street was released. The story and background for characters are there because there are casual, hardcore, and tournament players that actually want substance to characters they decide to main.
Too bad he's not really viable ocompetitively.Gouken was neat too.
RIP 2012 GoukenToo bad he's not really viable ocompetitively.