Apple smartwatch conference - March 9th

Status
Not open for further replies.
It looks really nice and all but I personally could not justify paying 400€ for this. I like being cheap though so that's OK. Bought an LG G today for 70€.
 
not like people like Kim Kardashian is going to care her 10k watch is "obsolete". She's gonna buy 4 different ones anyways just for the bands. :P

Guys, this is not a product for you, it's for rich iPhone users.

Pretty much. It's a shiny toy to show off and then forget about.
 
Anyone with a 5s,6,6+ upgrade to 8.2 yet? Any chance you could tell me where the option is to turn off the step counter writing to health? It's supposed to be in privacy in settings.
 
This thread has everything.

Apple is dead
Steve is spinning in his grave
AAPL stock down, investors not impressed

Just your normal Apple event then.
 
ITT many people don't realize that someone spending $17K on a watch wants to spend $17k on a watch. They don't want to buy a $2k watch or a $400 watch.

The higher price matters to them. They are not bargain hunting. They want to own something that costs much more than you can afford.
 
I see they've got a 2meter magsafe connector onsale as well. Quite nice.
 
Apple devices aren't obsolete after a year. I'll give it 4 or 5 years before this Watch is no longer able to connect to an iPhone. And even then it'll still tell the time.

'But then you'll lose so much important functionality!'

It having so much functionality is why people will buy it in the first place.

The problem is that at the end of the day apple will boost specs each 6-12 months and push updates (Id assume) that could potentially bog down past models just like on iPhones, I know the 10k one is for the rich people that want toys and that's chump change but 5-1k for the normal version just seems ridiculous. (The 5-600 seems high but I can see that being acceptable) but for the black one to be starting at 1k for the band alone?

I don't doubt these will still sell but I think it sets a shitty precedent moving forward that apple keeps charging higher prices for low specs, although this markets a little new to draw that conclusion I suppose
 
Steel, black sport bands, here.

One for both me and my wife - fell right into the price window I needed. Sweet!

8xLkzOb.jpg
 
pls don't mention the Moto360 again without posting a picture of how ugly / absurdly large and clunky it is

Moto-360.jpg

I've gotten nothing but compliments on my Moto 360. And that's before I show them a demo of texting via voice or navigating to a location, or when I recieve a picture message and it shows a preview; they're all wowed.
 
On one hand, I backed the Pebble Time Steel:
+ Cheaper
+ Better battery life
+ Waterproof
- Risk of being limited with iOS
- Out in july or later

On the other, the Apple Watch:
+ Screen
+ Siri
+ Full iOS support
+ Out April 24th
- Price
- Battery Life
- Not waterproof (?)

I'm torn :/
 
jUyvFVY.png


That's the one I really want but I can't justify that price for a watch that will be obsolete in a year or 2. I'll grab the black sport one to play around with at some point
 
Nothing much about the Watch was all that new today as compared to what we saw last September when it was unveiled. It pretty much functions about as you would expect. I'm personally going to wait to read some reviews before I think about a purchase, but when I do get one eventually it'll be the black Sport model, probably in the 42mm size.

For those saying that they will just go with the Pebble or one of the other smartwatch models available, that is obviously your purgative, and choice and competition are always a good thing. But the sheer number of apps that have already been announced for the Apple Watch is going to put it way out in front of the competition in terms of what it is capable of. The truly cool, innovative things that a smartwatch can do are going to appear on Apple's device, with Android Wear following suit. The Pebble is likely to always lag in this category.
 
The problem is that at the end of the day apple will boost specs each 6-12 months and push updates (Id assume) that could potentially bog down past models just like on iPhones, I know the 10k one is for the rich people that want toys and that's chump change but 5-1k for the normal version just seems ridiculous. (The 5-600 seems high but I can see that being acceptable) but for the black one to be starting at 1k for the band alone?

I don't doubt these will still sell but I think it sets a shitty precedent moving forward that apple keeps charging higher prices for low specs, although this markets a little new to draw that conclusion I suppose

6-12 months? When do Apple update products more then one per year? But when they update you can sell your old product with little loss in money.

I'll repeat myself like a broken record; seven years for the first generation iPhone.
 
On one hand, I backed the Pebble Time Steel:
+ Cheaper
+ Better battery life
+ Waterproof
- Risk of being limited with iOS
- Out in july or later

On the other, the Apple Watch:
+ Screen
+ Siri
+ Full iOS support
+ Out April 24th
- Price
- Battery Life
- Not waterproof (?)

I'm torn :/

I didn't realize you could back out of orders on Kickstarter prior to the end date. So I put a pledge in while I mull it over.
 
As an Apple die hard, I'm really surprised by my lack of care for this product. The price range makes me want to invest in a nice Hamilton that I won't need to upgrade in a couple years.
 
Hilarious to see so many people focused on the Edition pricing. Of course that was going to happen. Will be fun to see how it all plays out come launch time. :)
 
For those saying that they will just go with the Pebble or one of the other smartwatch models available, that is obviously your purgative, and choice and competition are always a good thing. But the sheer number of apps that have already been announced for the Apple Watch is going to put it way out in front of the competition in terms of what it is capable of. The truly cool, innovative things that a smartwatch can do are going to appear on Apple's device, with Android Wear following suit. The Pebble is likely to always lag in this category.

As an AndroidWear owner, I agree. was mostly watching this is see where Apple is going to push Google along. And it seems like they have some nice stuff here.

I haven't been following the news, so the stuff shown was mostly new to me.
 
As an Apple die hard, I'm really surprised by my lack of care for this product. The price range makes me want to invest in a nice Hamilton that I won't need to upgrade in a couple years.

The lack of its own functionality is disappointing. It almost feels like it's a stream box (like a vita TV or something) for your phone.
 
On one hand, I backed the Pebble Time Steel:
+ Cheaper
+ Better battery life
+ Waterproof
- Risk of being limited with iOS
- Out in july or later

On the other, the Apple Watch:
+ Screen
+ Siri
+ Full iOS support
+ Out April 24th
- Price
- Battery Life
- Not waterproof (?)

I'm torn :/

Apparently Tim Cook said you can shower with it. So I guess that makes it water resistant?
 
Impressive watch collection from a tech company. The design of the bands are superb.

I think they will succeed because they will be unique in the market. They will be the only ones offering high quality watches at every price range that runs sophisticated software.
 
ITT many people don't realize that someone spending $17K on a watch wants to spend $17k on a watch. They don't want to buy a $2k watch or a $400 watch.

The higher price matters to them. They are not bargain hunting. They want to own something that costs much more than you can afford.

Those multithousand dollar are almost always much higher quality internally. They have specialized in house movements specific to that particular watch. They are not 300 dollar watches with a few grams of gold attached.
 
This thread has everything.

Apple is dead
Steve is spinning in his grave
AAPL stock down, investors not impressed

Just your normal Apple event then.

I mean, it's an underwhelming device.

It will sell because of the logo, but it's not innovating anything. It's behind its competitors, in most respects.

Frustrating to see better products floundering, but this will flourish even though it's more expensive and less impressive than its counterparts.
 
I am not into the smart watch thing, however if I had to get one it'll be the new Pebble. It's got a cool ink display, week long battery and like their kick starter video said its not trying to replace your phone or other devices.

I don't need to check my instagram or Facebook wall on my watch. It needs to tell the time, set reminders and let me know if someone is calling or texting.

Upto £13,500 on a watch that will be out of date this time next year is ludicrous.

With that recent thing that showed Apple are making I think $200 on each phone sold I dread to think the $$$ that they'll be getting with these watches.
 
Can it be submerged though? This is important

From the Store Page:

**Apple Watch is splash and water resistant but not waterproof. You can, for example, wear and use Apple Watch during exercise, in the rain, and while washing your hands, but submerging Apple Watch is not recommended. Apple Watch has a water resistance rating of IPX7 under IEC standard 60529. The leather bands are not water resistant.
 
The lack of its own functionality is disappointing. It almost feels like it's a stream box (like a vita TV or something) for your phone.

Is it even going to be possible to un-tether it from the iphone at a reasonable price range anytime soon? Going by these launch numbers, I say no...
 
Nothing much about the Watch was all that new today as compared to what we saw last September when it was unveiled. It pretty much functions about as you would expect. I'm personally going to wait to read some reviews before I think about a purchase, but when I do get one eventually it'll be the black Sport model, probably in the 42mm size.

For those saying that they will just go with the Pebble or one of the other smartwatch models available, that is obviously your purgative, and choice and competition are always a good thing. But the sheer number of apps that have already been announced for the Apple Watch is going to put it way out in front of the competition in terms of what it is capable of. The truly cool, innovative things that a smartwatch can do are going to appear on Apple's device, with Android Wear following suit. The Pebble is likely to always lag in this category.

Not sure why you think this. Both Android Wear and Pebble have plenty of apps. There are equivalents to just about everything they showed during this conference. The biggest advantages AppleWatch have functionality wise is the speaker, and NFC which the Sony SW3 already has.
 
Holy fucking shit, 1099 for the black steel bracelet one? I can get a Longines Hydroconquest for that price, or two really really nice seiko dive watches.


godDAMN.
 
You can't even delete the Apple Watch app on 8.2, SMH Apple -_-

Should have been an option in settings rather than an app.
 
Not sure why you think this. Both Android Wear and Pebble have plenty of apps. There are equivalents to just about everything they showed during this conference. The biggest advantages AppleWatch have functionality wise is the speaker, and NFC which the Sony SW3 already has.

Because the list of apps available already today is impressive, and will only continue to get better. The Apple ecosystem draws developers more quickly, and it appears that'll be the case with the Watch too. I'm not saying Android Wear in particular won't have a robust app store to choose from, but don't be surprised when Apple Watch blows by the competition in this regard.

The same can be said about accessories too. I'm already seeing press releases show up in my inbox with third part bands for the Apple Watch. Don't like the price of the bands Apple is offering, don't worry, there will be plenty of others. This is just another area that Apple tends to have a leg-up on the competition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom