Wasn't Fall of Reach already literally rewritten after Halo Reach came out and ignored everything Nylund had written?
Think you ate some time crystals brah.
Wasn't Fall of Reach already literally rewritten after Halo Reach came out and ignored everything Nylund had written?
Okay. I just listened to the second soundcloud link (A Hairline Fracture) and it sounds like 343 just retconned the shit out of Fall of Reach. The general public knew about the Spartans (vaguely) long before the events of Halo 2, and they also knew there was more than one of them.
edit: Ah. I think I see what's going on.
Wasn't Fall of Reach already literally rewritten after Halo Reach came out and ignored everything Nylund had written?
We're all seeing the fact that the Master Chief trailer takes place (location time wise) AFTER the Spartan Locke trailer right?
It's like a game of spot the difference.
- The Spartan/Chief statue is damaged way more in the Chief Trailer than it is in the Locke trailer.
- The Locke Trailer's colour pallet and lighting is more suggestive of a morning/midday time while Chief Trailer's colour pallet and lighting is much darker and red and the sun is setting.
HOWEVER, Chief's armor is not damaged in anyway in his trailer.
So either they aren't linked in time like I think or Chief recovers and gets new armor between the two events.
is Master Chief a messiah type character is their a prophecy that he is the chosen one of the halo universe?
It didn't ignore everything.
And people are still upset with that?
What part are you referring to? The interviewer telling the woman John is a Spartan?
Reach retconned Fall of Reach.
Wasn't Fall of Reach already literally rewritten after Halo Reach came out and ignored everything Nylund had written?
Locke trailer so applicable to Halo right now. Locke is the fans, the statue is Bungie and 343 are Master Chief.
We're all seeing the fact that the Master Chief trailer takes place (location time wise) AFTER the Spartan Locke trailer right?
It's like a game of spot the difference.
- The Spartan/Chief statue is damaged way more in the Chief Trailer than it is in the Locke trailer.
- The Locke Trailer's colour pallet and lighting is more suggestive of a morning/midday time while Chief Trailer's colour pallet and lighting is much darker and red and the sun is setting.
HOWEVER, Chief's armor is not damaged in anyway in his trailer.
So either they aren't linked in time like I think or Chief recovers and gets new armor between the two events.
Time Crystals you say HmmThink you ate some time crystals brah.
Think you ate some time crystals brah.
It didn't ignore everything.
And people are still upset with that?
Shocking really. From the beta, the game needed A LOT of work. Makes me worried to be honest, especially for the readiness of its multiplayer. I would rather have it later with more time if it means a better title. But yeah, 343 doesn't have a reputation for listening to fan feedback...
......niceLocke trailer so applicable to Halo right now. Locke is the fans, the statue is Bungie and 343 are Master Chief.
Indeed.Saying that it retconned the whole book is just silly, though.
Me neither. Both are excellent.Apparently? The two can exist together just fine. Not sure why this is still a point for complaint.
Saying that it retconned the whole book is just silly, though.
Indeed.
![]()
![]()
Same shot - two different trailers.
Different overall tone... but same shot and the statue is older/more damaged in the second trailer. (Open up both the images and flick between the tabs)
IF these are meant to be two alternate versions of the same thing, why would the statue be more broken in one and not the other?
I'm interested in where he'll go. Can't be worse than Nightfall.Will anyone support #TeamLocke ? We barely know him ....
Minor thing but Locke is showing up as a friendly on Chief's radar.
![]()
Minor thing but Locke is showing up as a friendly on Chief's radar.
![]()
Im thinking its Reach, no particular reason other then it makes sense for a statue.
Chief isn't even on Locke's
![]()
![]()
Same shot - two different trailers.
Different overall tone... but same shot and the statue is older/more damaged in the second trailer. (Open up both the images and flick between the tabs)
IF these are meant to be two alternate versions of the same thing, why would the statue be more broken in one and not the other?
![]()
![]()
Same shot - two different trailers.
Different overall tone... but same shot and the statue is older/more damaged in the second trailer. (Open up both the images and flick between the tabs)
IF these are meant to be two alternate versions of the same thing, why would the statue be more broken in one and not the other?
Could just be Earth.Im thinking its Reach, no particular reason other then it makes sense for a statue.
![]()
![]()
Same shot - two different trailers.
Different overall tone... but same shot and the statue is older/more damaged in the second trailer. (Open up both the images and flick between the tabs)
IF these are meant to be two alternate versions of the same thing, why would the statue be more broken in one and not the other?
Minor thing but Locke is showing up as a friendly on Chief's radar.
![]()
In the Chief's scene, the statue is missing part of its head because Chief feels incomplete now that Cortana is dead.
Locke's HUD shows a BR icon, he's holding a DMR.
Great attention to detail. Or is it?
Im thinking its Reach, no particular reason other then it makes sense for a statue.
Could just be Earth.
So we're going back to Halo CE shield/life combo?
Cool.
Chief isn't even on Locke's
Could just be Earth.
So we're going back to Halo CE shield/life combo?
Cool.