Leaked Battlefront info (40 players, heroes, free Ep7 DLC, FPS & TPS) [Full Screens]
- Thread starter Sn4ke_911
- Start date
GavinUK86
Member
No but it has single player missions same as the previous games. They've already said that.
Fiery Phoenix
Banned
So it's just another Titanfall then?
I'm sure they axed space battles and SP to make sure this will not happen again.
I don't tend to play SP with MP games as more often than not they are not worth the time. So am ok with Co-op missions,
Yesss.gif
Vadernoooo.gif Why u do dis Dice??
Based on all the other hints from PS social accounts and John harker mention it would be surprising if it wasn't the case.
Yesss.gif
Vadernoooo.gif Why u do dis Dice??
Based on all the other hints from PS social accounts and John harker mention it would be surprising if it wasn't the case.
ChosenPredator
Banned
DICE campaigns are bad and utterly forgettable. Wouldn't you want all that time spent on making the MP great?
Haeralis The BRave
Banned
I didn't really enjoy the space battles very much, especially since they cut out aerial vehicles in BF2 (with the one exception at Hoth) specifically so that they could do space battles instead. Not sad to see them go.
I'm a little disappointed that there is nothing from the prequels though, that's stupid. There were some great prequel stages (Naboo, Mustafar, Coruscant, etc.) that should have been improved upon, not removed.
I'm a little disappointed that there is nothing from the prequels though, that's stupid. There were some great prequel stages (Naboo, Mustafar, Coruscant, etc.) that should have been improved upon, not removed.
Anton Sugar
Member
TBH, the co-op missions in Battlefield 3 sucked. They abandoned co-op completely in BF4.
Need more coal for this hype train, we're slowing down.
SniperHunter
Banned
good thing Dice finally ditched single player campaigns, they were simply no good at them at all.
let that dead space studio work on the single player stuff
let that dead space studio work on the single player stuff
Jack Scofield
Member
Wow at those screens. No way will it look remotely close to that good.
Or....like the first two games that everyone loves (but apparently nobody remembers what was actually in them).
ArchedThunder
Banned
I'm okay with this.
Sounds good to me to be honest. A DICE designed narrative driven campaign is not something that interests me.
Ambition
Member
ElzarTheBam
Member
Looks like 40 is the larger cap according to EG.
John Bender
Banned
Ok. I'm not so sure that that's the reason, though.
GavinUK86
Member
Titanfall was just MP. This isn't.
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
Lol at people being mad about no Campaign.
Battlefront was always a Multiplayer game first to me.
No need to waste time into a shitty and short campaign.
Battlefront was always a Multiplayer game first to me.
No need to waste time into a shitty and short campaign.
Indeed. I don't think this game really has an equal in terms of visuals at this moment.
Shame about the space battles, that idea sounded very exciting to me. But I guess that's what Star Citizen is for.
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
No campaign means all development time was focused on multiplayer.
Battlefront was always multiplayer first. The campaign was just tacked on. There is an offline mode though.
But off course don't expect a lower price.
$60 cuz EA
Collateral22
Member
No story is a plus for me. Give me stable online and a deep progression system.
Master Yoshi
Member
My faith is strong. Bring on the most refined, polished MP ever.
ãInaba Residentã
Banned
I love how so many people in this thread can't read.
OdysseusVA
Banned
They're not breaking shit today
I think they mean there's no campaign in the way of a "cohesive single-player history from plot point A to plot point B"... We seem to still be able to play several missions (I guess from various events in the Star Wars Saga) offline.
It's just that there's no plot running through/connecting those missions (well, besides the events in the Saga we all already know about). At least that's how I read it.
It's just that there's no plot running through/connecting those missions (well, besides the events in the Saga we all already know about). At least that's how I read it.
If it meant DICE was able to put more resources and time on MP then I'm all for it.
CecilRousso
Member
Everything I've played and seen from singleplayer campaigns in DICE's games have been so completely awful that I do am glad they're skipping it now. It's just a waste of resources.
And how fun would piloting AT-AT's really be? To make them worthwhile, they would probably have to go down the Robot Chicken route.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07zLbgXElsA
And how fun would piloting AT-AT's really be? To make them worthwhile, they would probably have to go down the Robot Chicken route.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07zLbgXElsA
I don't understand gaf sometimes.
When a new Battlefield launches, people complain that they spend to much time focusing on single-player.
When a new Battlefront launches, people complain that they spend to much time focusing on multi-player.
There will be single player missions, just not focused around a central story.
When a new Battlefield launches, people complain that they spend to much time focusing on single-player.
When a new Battlefront launches, people complain that they spend to much time focusing on multi-player.
There will be single player missions, just not focused around a central story.
schlongdog
Banned
No campaign is great news to me
My god now I remember the time where I actively followed Bad company 2 and Battlefield 3. Even today I couldn't make a polite comment about Demize99, Batch or zh1nt0.
Everything they don't put in their game is bad and not fun.
Until they finaly add it in the next game.
Eh not that bad. The previous two didn't have much of a campaign anyways. Co-op missions should be fun hopefully at least.
Flame Lord
Member
lol @ people caring about the campaign in a fucking Battlefront game. As long as it has some kind of mode where you can run around and fight AI (which it sounds like it does), it's pretty much the same as the original games. No space battles if pretty disappointing. I remember playing the demo for one of the PSP games and it fucking had space battles.
From the very little info I've seen and the screens it's looking quite promising so I can only hope for this game to be a great experience with an amazing soundtrack. I also saw the trailer from the movie and got me even more interested in the franchise. I saw all the movies but might see them again. I still have two Star wars games to play for the first time: Star Wars Republic Commando and Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II.
I bet November is yet going to be another great month packed with amazing titles. Here's hoping for the best when it comes to my time and wallet. I'm sure others are on the same boat.
I bet November is yet going to be another great month packed with amazing titles. Here's hoping for the best when it comes to my time and wallet. I'm sure others are on the same boat.
MagicWithEarvin
Member
I'm pretty hyped for this.
Suppose you didn't buy the other games either.
thenight11
Member
All the news has made me deflated , no space battles , no campaign 
NJDEN
Member
I can totally see space battles being DLC kinda how Dice did the naval stuff for battlefield 4.
Lack of campaign is disappointing, but not a total loss since it's the multiplayer that is important imo.
Keeping it OG trilogy era is ok with me as long as they make it feature packed...
The biggest thing for me is that it's 20v20... I don't understand why that is.
Lack of campaign is disappointing, but not a total loss since it's the multiplayer that is important imo.
Keeping it OG trilogy era is ok with me as long as they make it feature packed...
The biggest thing for me is that it's 20v20... I don't understand why that is.