Should've had him say "Most Impressive"
Leaked Battlefront info (40 players, heroes, free Ep7 DLC, FPS & TPS) [Full Screens]
- Thread starter Sn4ke_911
- Start date
Souldestroyer Reborn
Banned
There is plenty of space to be effective in jets in BF4. You need to be utilising the full 3D area of the map instead of only 2D.
On PS4 all maps have height ceiling of around 900-1000ft before the jet starts to stall. Take into account that ground troops can only look onto you up to an altitude of 400-500ft with a delay to allow locking on before firing, Then on top of that the actual size of the map.
You just got to be more efficient with the space.
Dreadnought
Member
Have they said anything about console resolution?
I expect 720p for Xbone
I expect 720p for Xbone
Seventy_X_Seven
Member
If it's really 2 maps per planet than that's 10 maps (Jakku is comes out two weeks later) which could be enough for Galactic Conquest 1.0
Just basic attack planets until you own them all. First attack makes it vulnerable, then second attack takes place on the alternate map and captures it. Buy team perks before matches.
Not nearly as good as Galactic Conquest 2.0 but serviceable.
Just basic attack planets until you own them all. First attack makes it vulnerable, then second attack takes place on the alternate map and captures it. Buy team perks before matches.
Not nearly as good as Galactic Conquest 2.0 but serviceable.
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
This is using the newest Frosbite version. I srsly doubt that the Engine at 60fps is still running only at 720p on XboxOne. They even switched the renderer to PBR.
I expect 900p or the CoDAW solution this time around.
Gunslinger
Member
So basically the x-wing, and TIE fighters are skins of BF4 jets? Lol this game is going to be trash. Just another mod for bf4 sold at 60 dollars. The original vision where ground and space battles take place simultaneously is now gone. Wow.....
Seventy_X_Seven
Member
When did they say this? Stop assuming things to fit your agenda
Referring to X Wings and TIE Fighters. Also the promo art shows Star Destroyers in atmosphere so we may get "space battles" that take place near the surface.
ElzarTheBam
Member
The amount of stupid in this thread is amazing.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
Lol what? Who said this? How can you even gleam that from the trailer?
My personal thoughts are exact opposite of yours.
Gunslinger
Member
The main post is already confirmed that there is no space battles. Ummm.....what? Huge step back from part 2. No campaign? OK...The original vision for bf3 was grand. This is just a bf4 star wars skin mod from what I see so far. Highly disappointed.
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
And again, Dice has nothing to do with the canned Free Radical Battlefront 3 game.
This isnt Battlefront 3.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
But you've seen no gameplay. You read some info and you're having a major knee jerk reaction.
Gunslinger
Member
That's fine I respect all of you guy's opinion. I just feel that this game is a huge step backwards from 2.
FunkyPajamas
Member
Same thing I went through with Destiny. I played the Beta, then played the Demo, read the impressions and read about the DLC/Expansions. It just didn't feel right to support a game like that. For me anyway.
I *really* want Battlefront to be the real deal. I want them to deliver on this. But I will hold on buying the game until I'm 100% certain I'm not going to be pissed while playing, thinking I shouldn't have bought it. I know I'm just one guy, but it's my hard earned money.
Who said they are reskins?
But it's a Battlefront game, they have been Star Wars themed Battlefield clones since day one. Why would you expect this one to suddenly be different when it's even developed by Dice?
I see what you mean, I just hope you are "wrong" because otherwise everybody will be really disappointed.
They can't really trash their reputation with a reskinned version of BF4 and I'm really sure they will bring something new, something that really give us the feeling of a Star Wars battle.
Kssio_Aug
Member
So...No space battles, no single player campaign, DLC up the wozzu.
I shouldn't be shocked since this is EA we are talking about...but still. Somehow, stupid me expected Dice to at least have the same amount of content as one of the last two games.
If this is how Battlefront is going to go down, I would have rather seen an HD remake of Battlefront 2 instead.
About the Space Battles I can understand. But why people recquire a SP canpaing just for the sake of it? Do anyone really enjoyed the BF4 campaing that much for example?
Campaings are good when developers and players give it some value. If they waste time and resources just to implement a shitty campaing, then I believe it doesnt worth it. Much better to have all the focus in the MP.
About the DLC, isn it free?
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
Both bf3 and 4 had god awful campaigns, didn't play hardline, but I heard it wasn't much better.
The Jakku one is but it's EA so they'll probably do a Battlefront Premium pass like they do with Battlefield.
Hardline's campaign was a vast improvement over BF 3 and 4 (although I didn't think 4's was too bad either) but still, that's not saying much.
Hardline was pretty nice to be honest. I enjoyed the SP over the MP (unfortunately got bored after 10/12h) !
MrRoflWaffles
Member
Gamezone
Gold Member
It's good that you did, but I think most of us didn't. The single player campaigns in both Battlefield and CoD is scriptet and bad.
Battlefront 1 did not have space Battles until the sequel in Battlefront 2 so yeah I think people are complaining about the new Battlefront but it seems nobody really remembers what Battlefront was, I always remember Battlefront for being a 3rd person shooter that didn't have a single player and instead had multiplayer that I would play against Bots, never even knew Battlefront had a FPS mode
I have to say. I really liked the space battles in BF2. It was really neat how you could attack planets but first you had to fight through an orbital blockade before taking the fight to the ground.
My nostalgia probably things the space stuff was better than it really was. But I hope they have a similar galactic conquest mode at the very least.
My nostalgia probably things the space stuff was better than it really was. But I hope they have a similar galactic conquest mode at the very least.
Manus
Member
I'm still upset on not having classes. Does that mean no more dark troopers or jet troopers? That was one of the best parts of the old games was playing as so many different units from the movies. Just seems weird to me that an old PS2 game would have more content than what's coming out this fall.
Xane
Member
There are birds in Star Wars. Birds (Avialae) are among the Dinosauria clade.
Get on pre-ordering now!
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
Preordered on my way home from work.
shungokusatsu
Member
Woah, Dolby Atmos support? Awwwww yiiiissss.
Eh, not so weird when newer AAA games take more resources to develop now. My uneducated theory is that they have to spend more and more time on individual aspects of a game, yet still have to adhere to a timeline similar to older games, thus meaning less features. It wouldn't be the first newer game I've noticed having less content and features than the previous iteration.
Or I could be wrong and it could be a simple balance decision or something where it's just easier to make a game without having to worry about eleventy billion combinations of guns and armor and loadouts and stuff.
RealityCheque
Banned
Pardon my cynicism but that trailer, pretty as it is, can go fuck itself.
If the finished product looks anything (or runs anything) like this, twin titan X's notwithstanding, I'll eat my fucking dualshock 4.
As it is, it has a Watchdogs ("My trailer is beautiful, lick me all over") vibe going for itself.
If the finished product looks anything (or runs anything) like this, twin titan X's notwithstanding, I'll eat my fucking dualshock 4.
As it is, it has a Watchdogs ("My trailer is beautiful, lick me all over") vibe going for itself.
OdysseusVA
Banned
Just eat some chocolate. Everything will be okay.
schlongdog
Banned
Anton Sugar
Member
Is it really hard to believe these graphics are possible on a PC? Console, I get, but DICE has never released any game footage that wasn't achievable on a PC, AFAIK.
LowParry
Member
The animations are a little less believable to me. The way the AT-AT comes crashing down for one thing. You compare that to BF 4 for example when a transport helicopter crashes and it feels like a generation ahead.
BruceLeeRoy
Banned
My man. High five
Yeah, no, nothing about the animations felt in-game to me. Even if it's just down to how the characters move.
they never said it was ingame, what more do you want them to do except putting text on the trailer that says in engine?
BruceLeeRoy
Banned
I'm not commenting on whether the game will actually look like that but I find it funny that some people are saying anything looks better than that trailer. If that's what the game looks like on a high spec PC it will be the new king of the hill.
The animations are almost definitely not in-game ones, but ones made for this tightly scripted trailer.
They've done it before with trailers in Battlefield, albeit usually partially while also showing genuine gameplay. In these cases the graphical fidelity will match the trailer, but the animations won't.
That remains to be seen with Battlefront, however.
HP_Wuvcraft
Banned
Never played a Battlefield.
Buying the shit out of this.
Buying the shit out of this.