It even says "representative of Playstation 4" at the end. Very curious to see how they define representative.
Leaked Battlefront info (40 players, heroes, free Ep7 DLC, FPS & TPS) [Full Screens]
- Thread starter Sn4ke_911
- Start date
A really neat mock-up from the other thread, made by EuropeOG.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
Yeah, no doubt the game will look good, maybe even great but I can't bring myself to believe it will look that good.
Dictator93
Member
Because the aesthetic and lore set up by the prequels is completely lame.
This represents the female sex.
JumPeRJumPzZ
Banned
My biggest fear is the IQ.
That Cinematic trailer looks so clean and crisp. I dont wanna imagine another 720p/900p frostbite game with a awful AA solution like BF4 and Hardline has.
That Cinematic trailer looks so clean and crisp. I dont wanna imagine another 720p/900p frostbite game with a awful AA solution like BF4 and Hardline has.
SnowFlakeCake
Member
The game seems incredibly bare bones from what we know, there ain't a proper single player campaign so is multiplayer only. Not that it matters much as its a DICE game but to have no proper SP at all but rather some co-op mode is a total cop out, it's obvious DICE thinks they can get away with this shit and get the game out for November. Didn't DICE only work on this for a couple years?
meanspartan
Member
Those graphics would be on par with The Order 1886, maybe even better. In a game with 20v20 matches.
Not gonna happen.
I think as of DAI they had a better AA solution. Hopefully they use that instead of the rough FXAA implementation they had in BF4.
RedAssedApe
Banned
saw this posted on facebook. can't really make out what's going on though.
That's the X Wing experience booth, like the Adam Boyes thing. It opened earlier today
IAmRandom31
Banned
The E3 gameplay demo at the PS4 conference will be very interesting.
They were able to do BF4 with cross-gen engine and such so I could envision quite the leap graphically with a pure current-gen only engine at the helm with full optimization of the engine taking advantage of the capabilities of the PS4 almost like it was an exclusive title.
Look at what Killzone ShadowFall was able to do with its engine AT LAUNCH.
I would fucking cry if it indeed ends up looking like the in-engine teaser. That is a dream come true looking Star Wars title that sounds like it will be pretty bare bones at first and then they can go in and add space battles and new planets and maps and modes and shit like that post launch. Ala DriveClub which continually added new shit after launch
Not an ideal scenario but yeah, that is a deadline for you
They were able to do BF4 with cross-gen engine and such so I could envision quite the leap graphically with a pure current-gen only engine at the helm with full optimization of the engine taking advantage of the capabilities of the PS4 almost like it was an exclusive title.
Look at what Killzone ShadowFall was able to do with its engine AT LAUNCH.
I would fucking cry if it indeed ends up looking like the in-engine teaser. That is a dream come true looking Star Wars title that sounds like it will be pretty bare bones at first and then they can go in and add space battles and new planets and maps and modes and shit like that post launch. Ala DriveClub which continually added new shit after launch
Not an ideal scenario but yeah, that is a deadline for you
RedAssedApe
Banned
ah so not the actual game. is that what the boyes video is from?
A.D. Skinner
Member
Are they just straight up ignoring 1-3 with this? I really hope not. I would have given anything to see this tech with Naboo and Droideka rolling around.
I say this because everywhere is specifically saying "...heroes from the original trilogy".
Mustafar was one of the best maps!
I really hope this game isn't lacking content like some articles are leading me to believe. There better be fun modes, there better be a campaign.
I say this because everywhere is specifically saying "...heroes from the original trilogy".
Mustafar was one of the best maps!
I really hope this game isn't lacking content like some articles are leading me to believe. There better be fun modes, there better be a campaign.
Yep
I think they pretty much have to in order to get the game out by November. If they do add in prequel trilogy content it would probably come in DLC
xclaw
Member
This is exactly what we'll get. Why people are even hoping otherwise is beyond me.
Enjoyed the trailor for what it was but they'll claim to have to reduce the IQ by 80% for it to run on consoles. Which will leave us with what we console games currently know as the power of the Frostbite engine!
Yeah.
Yep.
RealityCheque
Banned
Just when i start to give EA the benefit of the doubt they start using that kind of double-speak, again.
"Representative" will mean: looks generally like this, doesn't appear at this resolution and won't run at this framerate.
I get that people want this game to be good but come on, its not wrong to ask obvious questions when we're all far enough into this gen to know the performance capabilities of ps4/x1.
PodcastFips
Member
I wouldn't expect it on my PS4 or someone's X1 but there are these kind of games that raise the level of graphical fidelity every few years. The animations though...
The amount of work it would take to implement another era to the extent that they did for the OT era would be an extraneous amount of work, practically another full game. If they can't even do space battles then there's no way they can fit a whole other trilogy and tv show's worth of material in with what is already there. I expect it to be done for a sequel or expansion pack though.
"I'm sorry sir, it's time for you to leave".
Say what you want about the movies, but there a lot of people that appreciated that era's implementation in Battlefront. And thanks to The Clone Wars, it would have even more material to draw from than it otherwise would have. A map taking place on Umbara would have been amazing.
A really neat mock-up from the other thread, made by EuropeOG.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
There is no way in hell.
mysteriousmage09
Member
A really neat mock-up from the other thread, made by EuropeOG.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
Game won't look like that. PC might come close, consoles sure as shit wont especially with 60fps being promised. DICE knows they can get away with saying whatever the hell they want and people eat their shit with a smile on their face. The DLC will be absurd as well, I can already see it.
-"Galactic Conquest mode"! Take your battles above the skies an into space with epic 64 player space battles! "$15"
-"The Trade Federation"! Droids Droids Droids! "$15"
-"Clone Wars"! Get ready to for massive ground battles during the period of the Clone Wars! Play as heroes such as Count Dooku, General Grievous, Mace Windu and more! "$15"
So on and so forth.
LowParry
Member
All depends on how the maps are made. 40 isn't a bad number people.
"Buy it all now with Battlefront Premium and get golden packs each week and exclusive armor designs for your soldiers!"
MatrixMan.EXE
Member
Such a lazy argument. I love how people like yourself must resort to accusing people of being fanboys if their opinion doesn't line up perfectly with yours.
I put 400 hours into BF4 and 64 players is indeed fantastic. But I'm open to the idea of 40 player battles, which I still see as a lot of players anyway. Especially if the maps are designed around said player count. Leave 64 players for Battlefield I say.
How come BC2 gets so much praise and that game was only 32 players?
Hardline has 64 player TDM right now and it's a clusterfuck. Hell even Conquest Large in that game is a clusterfuck because most maps were designed for 32 players.
It's all about how they design the maps and the modes, more is not always better.
Hardline has 64 player TDM right now and it's a clusterfuck. Hell even Conquest Large in that game is a clusterfuck because most maps were designed for 32 players.
It's all about how they design the maps and the modes, more is not always better.
MikeE21286
Member
Wow game looks great but that is just BS. Will never look like that. Not going to get fooled.
StoppedInTracks
Member
A really neat mock-up from the other thread, made by EuropeOG.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
That looks like a movie.
shadowsdarknes
Member
Its really not that simple. If the levels are designed for a certain player count, then adding more people for the sake of more doesn't really do us any good. Having a clusterfuck mode simply for the sake of giving people options isn't better.
So no, more options is not always a good thing.
To be fair, they did put put quite a lot of DLC content for BF3 and BF4 for a good asking price. Just looking at map quantity for BF4, the main game had 10 maps for $60 originally and the extra Premium DLC content eventually had 20 maps for $60 up front originally.
Just from a sheer quantity standpoint, it's a decent value. Whether or not it holds up quality wise, well that's a matter of opinion I guess.
Just from a sheer quantity standpoint, it's a decent value. Whether or not it holds up quality wise, well that's a matter of opinion I guess.
Messofanego
Banned
That's cause it is. It's a cinematic.
@EAStarWars
Our #StarWarsBattlefront Q&A with @DICEfigge is about to kick off! Submit your questions now.
https://twitter.com/EAStarWars/status/589202531982520320
Our #StarWarsBattlefront Q&A with @DICEfigge is about to kick off! Submit your questions now.
https://twitter.com/EAStarWars/status/589202531982520320
Doug Heffernan
Member
Splitscreen is a nice feature, wasn't expecting that from Dice.
Because even the cancelled BF3 was designed for 64 players, with ground to space.
Mugatu
Member
I can't wait for this.
It is sad to see everyone making the same lame EA/DICE jokes over and over again - if they weren't true and/or funny several years ago during BF3 they're even less so now.
BF add-ons have been a very good value and the games have all looked great despite many screaming BS when first revealed.
It is sad to see everyone making the same lame EA/DICE jokes over and over again - if they weren't true and/or funny several years ago during BF3 they're even less so now.
BF add-ons have been a very good value and the games have all looked great despite many screaming BS when first revealed.
Can someone ask how close the actual gameplay on PS4 is to this image? That way we can shut some people up in here:
That's a completely different game made by different people. DICE wants to make a 40 player max game so the maps and modes will be designed according to that.
A really neat mock-up from the other thread, made by EuropeOG.
This is basically what DICE is promising the game will look like, lol.
What are you talking about? It WILL look like this.
On my godly SLI PC @ 4K.
bonesmccoy
Banned
40 seems like a good number. I've spent enough time playing Planetside 2 to realise that more is not necessarily better.
The visuals are *obviously* cooked a bit - it is a trailer after all. But I was struck by how much it looks like DA:I does on PC. I don't think the system requirements to run this and have it look excellent will be that demanding.
Collateral22
Member
Pretty sure it will be 720p on PS4. The pre order only has 720p, yet Batman which is 1080p has 720p, 1080i and 1080p.
I don't have a twitter. Can someone or has someone asked about instant action? Would literally be all I need to buy this if its like Battlefront 2
EDIT: Also, maybe ask about alpha/beta
Gunslinger
Member
@Xcellere
This can run at 60 fps with that graphics on ps4 at 640x480 resolution. All joking aside expect severe downgrade for console.