His Majesty
Banned
![]()
Fenway is in the game
I'd rather have the piss-filter from Fallout 3 back instead of this.
I wonder if the game will have loading times for indoor.
![]()
Fenway is in the game
-GAF rages demanding Fallout 4 since forever
-Fallout 4 finally revealed
-GAF rages about the graphics, the least important aspect of any game.
GAF in a nutshell.
It should!
Yes, The VATS system lets you pinpoint targets (limbs, heads, torsos, etc) and shoot them right off. It might not always happen. The gore is actually less than everywhere else you look. Skyrim didn't have a lot of gore to be honest. Fallout only gets its gore from VATS IMO.
![]()
Okay, yes, it isn't pretty. But it's Fallout 4.
You are going to be playing Fallout 4.
Isn't that enough for you, because I know I'm hyped as hell.
Oh hell ya!! What is the location?? Boston?
The visuals they use for the pre nuclear period make me go holy shit I want to play that and then when they switch post nuclear I just want to puke. I realize this is the whole point of the game, but every other AAA game looks like that so there's nothing for me.
Probably 30.with those graphics, high chance for 60 fps on consoles ?
Shots from the Gamersyde trailer.
M°°nblade;166292029 said:What a contradiction.
If anything, it's the lack of geometry and lighting effect that's hurting the game's looks.
How are the graphics the LEAST important part of a game that's trying to sell you on a setting?
Originally Posted by Darkstorne
This game was in pre-production since 2008, and full production since 2011 - two years before current gen consoles went on sale and before they even officially existed. Fallout is a series expected to sell 10 million + copies these days. Chances are extremely high this started out as a cross-gen game but shifted to current gen only a year or so ago when Zenimax were convinced by PS4/Xbone adoption rates to ditch the larger install base of last gen.
That explains the lower-than-expected graphic quality. At least we'll easily be seeing 1080p and 30+fps on consoles, and PC gamers know not to worry about visuals in Bethesda Game Studios titles anyway =)
Cross post from the other thread
there is your answer and Why this looks more like GTA5 and less like The Witcher 3
![]()
Fenway is in the game
Yea, it looks stellar.Looks exactly the same to me.
![]()
Excuse me chaps, while I go to cancel my pre order.
You won't be missed.Looks like fucking gamebryo again. You can go fuck yourself bethesda.
Shots from the Gamersyde trailer.
![]()
Fenway is in the game
No way MGSV will be as large as Fallout though
Hell didn't Kojima already indicate this when he compared his game to GTA5?
MGS5 is confirmed cross gen though. If Fallout 4 really isn't cross gen we don't know what Bethesda is doing to take advantage of the hardware. This could be the biggest world ever seen in a video game for all we know.
And for the people making Witcher 3 comparisons, at least Bethesda is actually showing us what the game will look like (plus they're games haven't been about the graphics since Oblivion). Plus Witcher 3 still has bad framerate on PS4 after not looking like initial footage which really hinders gameplay. Bethesda is hopefully putting the effort in where it matters.
lol @ people calling out the game's visuals. Really? Like, have you even seen Bethesda's previous games?
Once you realize there are tens of thousands of different people on this website, you'll have a better time understanding how GAF can have different and conflicting opinions on something.
It IS Boston. Confirmed a bit back as I recall.
gamebryo looking good
I loved the filter in 3. That was my one complaint from the trailer...too much color!I'd rather have the piss-filter from Fallout 3 back instead of this.
I wonder if the game will have loading times for indoor.
"Ugh! I wish developers were upfront about their game's visuals in trailers or even lowered graphical fidelity so once the game is out, our expectations our met and nobody would have deceived us!"
*Fallout 4 trailer releases*
"Ugh, that's so ugly! What developer would show a game looking like this in confidence?! Are they trying to get me to not buy their ugly looking game? This is some PS2, early 360 era stuff! Fallout 3 looked the same, even better in spots!"
![]()
You won't be missed.
Gamebryo isn't a issue because of the visuals. You don't play Fallout because of the visuals. It's an issue because of the bugs.
Please let this be the first moderns FO title that's been put through at least an competent QA team.
Please, stop that hivemind / strawman stuff."Ugh! I wish developers were upfront about their game's visuals in trailers or even lowered graphical fidelity so once the game is out, our expectations our met and nobody would have deceived us!"
*Fallout 4 trailer releases*
"Ugh, that's so ugly! What developer would show a game looking like this in confidence?! Are they trying to get me to not buy their ugly looking game? This is some PS2, early 360 era stuff! Fallout 3 looked the same, even better in spots!"
I don't understand why they didn't just wait for their E3 conference :s
Good. Give me mods or give me death.Smells like gamebryo
Looks great, but man... Voiced main character, that really sucks..
Which speaks volumes about how awful the original assets were, I suppose, as I don't find them to look particularly detailed in those shots either.There's an instagram filter, but some of the assets are also significantly improved over the base game.