I'm getting it, but what a dumb name, are their any uncharted games without Nathan drake?
No but there is Golden Abyss wich have Nathan Drake and is not in this collection. So yes it is a stupid name.
I'm getting it, but what a dumb name, are their any uncharted games without Nathan drake?
It's really not-- Uncharted is about the experience of the story, the multiplayer has always been a canned ham add-on that has never felt like it belonged. People pissy about it not being in this collection are all hot under the collar for no good reason.
It's really not-- Uncharted is about the experience of the story, the multiplayer has always been a canned ham add-on that has never felt like it belonged. People pissy about it not being in this collection are all hot under the collar for no good reason.
No multiplayer included outside of the beta it seems.
Jak and Daxter HD Collection was $40.
Ratchet and Clank HD Collection was $40.
The Sly Collection was $40.
The God of War Saga was $40.
The Splinter Cell HD Collection was $40.
The Prince of Persia HD Collection was $40.
The Hitman HD Collection was $40.
The Tomb Raider HD Collection was $40.
The Devil May Cry HD Collection was $40.
The Infamous Collection was $40.
The Killzone Collection was $40.
The Resistance Collection was $40.
The Metal Gear Solid Legacy Collection was $50 (5 games).
The Assassin's Creed: Ezio Trilogy Collection was $40.
There's a very obvious precedent for these sort of collections and people really aren't being unreasonable when they point out that this is overpriced.
If there's no MP - and going by box art they're won't be - it's most likely because they want you focused on getting U4 for MP as well as the next SP campaign.its dissappointing but it makes sense for the Uncharted 4.
The fact you get Beta only strengthens need to focus to on that.
Bluepoint plus 1080/60fps says I'll probably double dip although I might wait for price to dip a little before dipping myself.
I'm getting it, but what a dumb name, are their any uncharted games without Nathan drake?
that does not change the cost to produce them.60 bucks for 3 last-gen games is reasonable, not overpriced. especially if it's the premier franchise of playstation.
people whining are the ones who just want to buy everything cheap and scream "anti-consumer" when 1) they're not forced to buy it and 2) it's not like they're charging so big a premium. if you can't afford 60 bucks, then buy it next year. you don't want to wait? then buy it now.
it's seriously a cycle that never ends. we want everything to be cheap, that doesn't mean we have to be unreasonable about it. people bought tlou for 60 bucks, i don't know why 3 uncharted games suddenly *should not* be 60 bucks no matter what.
and as many here have shown, it's not even close to being overpriced.
Jak and Daxter HD Collection was $40.
Ratchet and Clank HD Collection was $40.
The Sly Collection was $40.
The God of War Saga was $40.
The Splinter Cell HD Collection was $40.
The Prince of Persia HD Collection was $40.
The Hitman HD Collection was $40.
The Tomb Raider HD Collection was $40.
The Devil May Cry HD Collection was $40.
The Infamous Collection was $40.
The Killzone Collection was $40.
The Resistance Collection was $40.
The Metal Gear Solid Legacy Collection was $50 (5 games).
The Assassin's Creed: Ezio Trilogy Collection was $40.
There's a very obvious precedent for these sort of collections and people really aren't being unreasonable when they point out that this is overpriced.
No but there is Golden Abyss wich have Nathan Drake and is not in this collection. So yes it is a stupid name.
No one had a problem when TLOU:R was $50. Why is it bad for a 3 game collection to be $10 more?
WHAT?! Hahaha. You can't be serious. Thousands and thousands of people played the games' MP components every day for years. It was almost universally loved, feature-packed, and had lots of content.
People complaining about these 3 games for 60 quid. Get a grip.
Jak and Daxter HD Collection was $40.
Ratchet and Clank HD Collection was $40.
The Sly Collection was $40.
The God of War Saga was $40.
The Splinter Cell HD Collection was $40.
The Prince of Persia HD Collection was $40.
The Hitman HD Collection was $40.
The Tomb Raider HD Collection was $40.
The Devil May Cry HD Collection was $40.
The Infamous Collection was $40.
The Killzone Collection was $40.
The Resistance Collection was $40.
The Metal Gear Solid Legacy Collection was $50 (5 games).
The Assassin's Creed: Ezio Trilogy Collection was $40.
There's a very obvious precedent for these sort of collections and people really aren't being unreasonable when they point out that this is overpriced.
I didn't get into Uncharted 2 multiplayer till after Patch 1.04. From what I understand, Patch 1.04 decreased players health? (making it closer to Call of Duty)
TLOU:R was dropped to $50 after complaints about the price.
When first released, the GOW HD collection was $40 for 2 games. The GOW CoO/GoS HD collection was $40 for 2 games. The Team Ico collection was $40 for 2 two games. Those price points seemed fair to most people, did they not?
How is a collection of 3 previous gen games, remastered with the same care as those examples, not worth $20 apiece?
Actually to me this sound more extensive.When first released, the GOW HD collection was $40 for 2 games. The GOW CoO/GoS HD collection was $40 for 2 games. The Team Ico collection was $40 for 2 two games. Those price points seemed fair to most people, did they not?
How is a collection of 3 previous gen games, remastered with the same care as those examples, not worth $20 apiece?
Not exactly a fair comparison, as a lot of those are not Remasters (Eg no extra work or effort required), simply bundled re-releases. On top of that, many that are, feature older games (from even earlier generations). Re-release bundles at the end of a generational cycle are often cheaper, and remasters of much older games tend to be too. It's why Last of Us Remaster was more expensive, because at the time it was still regarded as a fairly new title. If Uncharted 1 and 2 were from the PS1 or PS2 days, I've no doubt this would be a $40 release.
Have you not played them? Nate is the main character in each of them, hence the name.
Unless they do some major revamps to the gunplay and movement, UC1 is pretty dated and hasn't aged well.
And I assume they get the necessary support from Naughty Dog to do exactly that. They even stated gameplay tweaks, whatever that turns out to be. Guess we'll have to wait and see.Only thing is it's a different studio doing this collection, I don't think all 3 uncharteds are going to get the same love last of us remastered got.
I think it hammers home that it's the single player campaigns only? Since they're basically Nathan Drake campaigns.
They should have just called it "The Uncharted Collection" because it's just as descriptive.
It also was more recent, included the DLC, and did not remove the multiplayer / DLC from the game.
Missing content. Lots of it. Those games lost nothing in the transition.
Actually to me this sound more extensive.
thats gonna be great,but mp&sp is different pipeline,and UC4 MP beta might be with it on the launch,the HD version kinda means 3 games plus UC4 MP,although its betaIf that's 60 dollars and includes multiplayer, its pretty damn awesome!
Booty us NA plebs have to wait a few extra days.
Still- makes me a happy cat.
![]()
I had no idea this many people played MP
I bought each game, played through the campaign once and put it back on the shelf
I put like 200 hours into UC3. It was godlike.
Nah, that sounds lame. The Nate Drake Collection is fine.
The Marcus Fenix Collection would have been fine, if MS went through with a full Gears series remaster, as well.