NoLongerALurker
Banned
$60 for all three games, right? Basically $20 for each game so why people complaining? I'm in.
People are complaining because you could get all 3 games for about $20 on PS3 and it would include MP/Co-op.
$60 for all three games, right? Basically $20 for each game so why people complaining? I'm in.
I really enjoyed Uncharted 2's coop mode. Yes, they are primarily single-player games, but the MP modes were not crappy tacked on shit that no one cared about, and it's a shame that they're missing from the collection.Who in the fuck buys the Uncharted games for multiplayer? Seriously?? Anyone? The game is about the single player experience and I for one cherish the fact that Naughty Dog still gets that.
It does imply it, very heavily in fact. Why would they even include that message in the first place if multiplayer was there?that does not necessarily imply that there is no multiplayer at all, does it
It's really not-- Uncharted is about the experience of the story, the multiplayer has always been a canned ham add-on that has never felt like it belonged. People pissy about it not being in this collection are all hot under the collar for no good reason.Me. Because you know after the single player campaign is done the multiplayer is where the meat of the game is at. This shit is bordering on Nintendo levels of down play.
yeah and majority of them were ps2 games i.e. less work than doing a remaster of ps3/360 games.
with your logic, 3 snes games are equivalent to 3 ps3 games.
Jak and Daxter HD Collection was $40.
Ratchet and Clank HD Collection was $40.
The Sly Collection was $40.
The God of War Saga was $40.
The Splinter Cell HD Collection was $40.
The Prince of Persia HD Collection was $40.
The Hitman HD Collection was $40.
The Tomb Raider HD Collection was $40.
The Devil May Cry HD Collection was $40.
The Infamous Collection was $40.
The Killzone Collection was $40.
The Resistance Collection was $40.
The Metal Gear Solid Legacy Collection was $50 (5 games).
The Assassin's Creed: Ezio Trilogy Collection was $40.
There's a very obvious precedent for these sort of collections and people really aren't being unreasonable when they point out that this is overpriced.
SP campaign wasn't broken for 8months. Stop spreading FUD
Sure then it shouldn't be 60$ is all I am saying. Or maybe one the first game remastered or something. This is just 1080p/60fps bump.
Who in the fuck buys the Uncharted games for multiplayer? Seriously?? Anyone? The game is about the single player experience and I for one cherish the fact that Naughty Dog still gets that.
Yes you can ,bit none of them will have the improvements which is the whole point.People are complaining because you could get all 3 games for about $20 on PS3 and it would include MP/Co-op.
The Jak and Daxter games were written in a homebrewed Naughty Dog variant of the Lisp programming language called GOAL. It's a functional programming language (totally different paradigm than C++ and imperative langs) that's dead. Bluepoint reverse-engineered that.
But at what point did I say you shouldn't buy it? lol as a fan I myself will buy it but that doesnt change the fact that its a poor value compare to MCC.
It was. Only the MP was broken.
Wow... how dare people enjoy a well-designed game mode that gave longevity to the original games. You're right, what a bunch of clowns!It's really not-- Uncharted is about the experience of the story, the multiplayer has always been a canned ham add-on that has never felt like it belonged. People pissy about it not being in this collection are all hot under the collar for no good reason.
You should re-read the announcement. Single player campaigns. No multi.
But full 1080p/60fps is easily enough for me to double dip on all 3.
Why is the ezio collection there?
isnt it just the 3 ezio games with all dlc in one case?
Its early access for ingame content which is no big dealPreorder bonus is kind of lol.
But then again, they are rarely good.
Judging by TLoU: Remastered and specifically mentioning similar measures for the Uncharted Collection, you are in for a surprise.Its going to be essentialy higher res and smoother...
Porting PS2 games to PS3 was not really easy. I would argue in some cases harder than porting these games on PS4, since the PS3 had performance bottlenecks over the PS2 that required reworking in some games that could be quite complicated.yeah and majority of them were ps2 games i.e. less work than doing a remaster of ps3/360 games.
with your logic, 3 snes games are equivalent to 3 ps3 games.
I'm getting it, but what a dumb name, are their any uncharted games without Nathan drake?
UC2's multiplayer was literally a masterwork upon release. Like Counter Strike 1.6 levels of classic. Simple, well balanced, fun, thrilling even if you lost
They made the modes worse and worse as the years went by, but Uncharted has still had good multiplayer since they first implemented it.
To you maybe, but others have put hundreds of hours into them and view them as solid multiplayers. Certainly adds a lot of replay value to the games.It's really not-- Uncharted is about the experience of the story, the multiplayer has always been a canned ham add-on that has never felt like it belonged. People pissy about it not being in this collection are all hot under the collar for no good reason.
The Last of Us followed by Bloodborne.Awesome. Never owned a PS3 and will hopefully be getting a PS4 at the end of the year if finances allow me. No idea what ill play first on my PS4. This? TLoU? Witcher 3?
Me. Because you know after the single player campaign is done the multiplayer is where the meat of the game is at. This shit is bordering on Nintendo levels of down play.
Judging by TLoU: Remastered and specifically mentioning similar measures for the Uncharted Collection, you are in for a surprise.
Digital Foundry vs The Last of Us Remastered
It's really not-- Uncharted is about the experience of the story, the multiplayer has always been a canned ham add-on that has never felt like it belonged. People pissy about it not being in this collection are all hot under the collar for no good reason.
Yes you can ,bit none of them will have the improvements which is the whole point.
This is not just a copy and paste port job.
Jak and Daxter HD Collection was $40.
Ratchet and Clank HD Collection was $40.
The Sly Collection was $40.
The God of War Saga was $40.
The Splinter Cell HD Collection was $40.
The Prince of Persia HD Collection was $40.
The Hitman HD Collection was $40.
The Tomb Raider HD Collection was $40.
The Devil May Cry HD Collection was $40.
The Infamous Collection was $40.
The Killzone Collection was $40.
The Resistance Collection was $40.
The Metal Gear Solid Legacy Collection was $50 (5 games).
The Assassin's Creed: Ezio Trilogy Collection was $40.
There's a very obvious precedent for these sort of collections and people really aren't being unreasonable when they point out that this is overpriced.
There's a very obvious precedent for these sort of collections and people really aren't being unreasonable when they point out that this is overpriced.
Older games diminish in value. The Jak and Daxter Collection would not be worth the same price today as it was a generation ago. There's a reason many people think SNES games are overpriced on Nintendo's VC even at $8 a pop.
Why the comparison with MCC all the time anyway?
Nintendo sold Mario 64 on 3DS at 40 bucks, and recently the zeldas also at 40 bucks each. The Last Of us remastered sold very well at I think 40 bucks. Price is not the issue. Dont forget this is also mainly targeted at people that never played Uncharted just like TLOU.