Right, can someone tell me if I've got this straight.
You can now buy:
Digital:
Taken King DLC - $40
CE DLC - $20
Digital CE (Taken King DLC + CE DLC) - $80
Physical:
Legendary Disc (Destiny with Dark Below, House Of Wolves and Taken King DLCs) - $60
CE (Destiny with three DLCs + CE DLC + art books and shit) - $80
So you're overpaying by $20 is you buy the digital CE, and you don't get all the physical CE additions?What is the point of the digital CE edition, and do they give you anything if you've already bought it in light of the stand alone $20 CE DLC?
I'd love to know what happened with this game really. Some were impressed but HoW but I wasn't. Taking out the Raid was a nasty move especially since they knew people had already bought the content.
Why did Joe leave? Why did they gut the entire story and ship with barely a narrative? The funny part is these expansions don't expand on the main narrative at all, they are essentially side quests. Wouldn't Crota rising gain attention from the speaker? Why is nothing tied together AT ALL.
They don't even have Marty anymore. Face it, they sold out.
How the hell is it "bad reporting" to make an interview transcript?As he states in his apology, if you know him, you know he is being sarcastic.
When presented as a raw transcript, all of that is lost, and it looks like he's being an asshole. The fact that the EG guy had to try to defend Luke in a tweet after the fact tells you that even he knew that it was meant as sarcasm.
I guess the net "positive" for that piece of bad reporting is that everyone has a new option for spending money on TTK. lol
Bungie just sounds like a shitty company at this point tbh.
I'd love to know what happened with this game really. Some were impressed but HoW but I wasn't. Taking out the Raid was a nasty move especially since they knew people had already bought the content.
As he states in his apology, if you know him, you know he is being sarcastic.
When presented as a raw transcript, all of that is lost, and it looks like he's being an asshole. The fact that the EG guy had to try to defend Luke in a tweet after the fact tells you that even he knew that it was meant as sarcasm.
I guess the net "positive" for that piece of bad reporting is that everyone has a new option for spending money on TTK. lol
Thanks for this! I heard the expansions weren't great... So I'll probably skip all this unfortunately.
Well to be fair, that's what was the original source of the problem was. Fans complaining about not getting the "special items" from the new collector's edition.Is this a joke I don't get how Emotes and Shaders are worth $20. Hell I don't even think TTK is worth $40.
Because it removes any of the context. It's not as bad as simply taking quotes and misrepresenting what someone is saying, but it is not explaining the tone of the conversation.How the hell is it "bad reporting" to make an interview transcript?
I love how Bungie were so eager to get away from Microsoft.... Seems to be going great!
The primary problem with them, the first in particular, was the value prop. Upgrading to the $60 edition means you get the first two for $20, basically half price, which is actually pretty good for a lot of content (and the HoW in particular is excellent). Reasonable people can disagree about whether the combination of TTK and the first two is worth $60, of course. (Though we don't yet know what TTK entails.)
They became storefronts and teases for up-sells and cross-sells. Not since the days of plugging quarters into arcades has the actual prices involved been so upfront a part of the process. We literally need spreadsheets to break down all the editions and retailer exclusives and pre-orders and promotions, etc - and now we have one heavy hitting game pushing a multi-year DLC strategy we haven't really seen on the consoles.What happened to video games, man?
They say that because they haven't outlined any details and the previous DLC for 40 dollars has been terrible.Which is why the multitude of posts saying "TTK isn't even worth $40" come off as completely silly.
I mean, when he was talking to Brad Shoemaker from Giant Bomb, he was making fun of him for still using the Suros. Am I supposed to be offended that he attacked a journalist? No, because it's all in good fun and that's just how he is. None of that is there in the EG interview, and I have to assume that everything he said was in the same tone given everything that I know about Luke Smith.They didn't quote him out of context. They didn't ask him a gotcha question. Quoting someone is not bad journalism.
What he said came off as blunt, insensitive and out of touch with the fanbase because what he said was blunt, insensitive and out of touch with the fanbase.
So wait, you're calling the piece bad reporting because they didn't add a "don't worry, Luke was just joking" at the end of their interview?Because it removes any of the context. It's not as bad as simply taking quotes and misrepresenting what someone is saying, but it is not explaining the tone of the conversation.
The fact that the EG guy went on twitter to defend Luke Smith the day after clearly shows that he knows that people are misinterpreting his interview.
They say that because they haven't outlined any details and the previous DLC for 40 dollars has been terrible.
Most people here don't seem to have an issue with Luke's apology, just the hilariously high price for the collector's edition stuff.It's super interesting seeing the reactions to Luke's response here vs on twitter/other internet. Everywhere else people seem to be thanking/congratulating him on fixing the situation, where here it's mostly lampooning and how bungie missed the mark completely.
As a huge Destiny fan, this is a really good disguised fuck you to the fans/day 1 crowd.
Thanks Bungie/Activsion
People also said we didn't know of everything that Destiny had in it before it came out. Except it turns out we did.Which is why the multitude of posts saying "TTK isn't even worth $40" come off as completely silly.
Yes, because - and perhaps I am being overly cynical here - they wanted an antagonistic article to get free clicks.So wait, you're calling the piece bad reporting because they didn't add a "don't worry, Luke was just joking" at the end of their interview?
I don't recall them ever saying the House of Wolves would feature a Raid.
Yes, because - and perhaps I am being overly cynical here - they wanted an antagonistic article to get free clicks.
Again, the fact that the interviewer tried to defend Luke Smith after the fact shows that there was nothing malicious in the interview. He said it was "Good natured", iirc. It's just the way it was presented.
They say that because they haven't outlined any details and the previous DLC for 40 dollars has been terrible.
They can't win. Either devs are robot automatons who are emotionless PR spouting mouthpieces, or they are too personal and shouldn't be palling around.
I mean, all it would take is some context. "As Smith playfully suggested to me in a sarcastic tone, "Would you throw money at the screen if I showed you the new emotes?"" and it'd be fine. That or just record the interview and post it as video.
For me, this saga is amusing because I find myself defending Luke Smith but also hating the practices being put in place by Bungie/Activision. Go figure. lol
Interesting... I guess I'll wait for reviews at this point. So the 60$ digital package includes ttk and both expansions... At this point I think I would buy the disc which includes the base game too and sell my original copy or something. It just feels weird to basically rebuy the game. I wish they'd make things simpler, I think I would prefer regular annual releases at this point.The primary problem with them, the first in particular, was the value prop. Upgrading to the $60 edition means you get the first two for $20, basically half price, which is actually pretty good for a lot of content (and the HoW in particular is excellent). Reasonable people can disagree about whether the combination of TTK and the first two is worth $60, of course. (Though we don't yet know what TTK entails.)
They're probably ecstatic and surprised they didn't originally think of it.
Whales are incapable of waiting a year. That's why they're whales.At this rate, why would anyone buy Destiny 2 when you can wait a year or two and get everything cheaper and feel like you have made a more substantial purchase?
This is not how you should treat your fans/whales of your quasi-mmo.
At this rate, why would anyone buy Destiny 2 when you can wait a year or two and get everything cheaper and feel like you have made a more substantial purchase?
This is not how you should treat your fans/whales of your quasi-mmo.
Which is why the multitude of posts saying "TTK isn't even worth $40" come off as completely silly.
I don't think 9 cosmetic items will make that big a difference to change people's minds either way.
If none of this Collectors Edition talk ever happened, and none of us knew about the existence of these nine items, and then tomorrow they randomly showed up at the post office for every Destiny player, it would do absolutely nothing to change peoples minds about the big picture complaints.
And the money-to-value thing is such a weird subject to me. On one hand, playing through all the content didn't take nearly as long as I'd hoped. On the other hand, I've spent more time playing Destiny than I have a LOT of other game that I paid full price for, so by that metric, yeah, I probably got my current $100 investment's worth.
How much can I justifiably complain if I'm still playing the game dozens of hours later? At that point, how much difference would be made if the campaign was double the length or not?
Whales are incapable of waiting a year. That's why they're whales.
"We're sorry. Please pay $20 to accept our apology."
fuck video games