John Kowalski
Banned
I don't really know what goodness is but i look at humans and i know it isn't there.
lol did they even have dank memes before agriculture?
I don't really know what goodness is but i look at humans and i know it isn't there.
This.That's a fucking stupid question.
YES.
If you live in a first world country, that is absolutely not true.
Everyone wants to convince themselves it is because nobody wants to live a lie
However, believing that you own anything is the biggest lie of all
It is the gift of life. You have nothing to defend. You are already alive. You don't need to "earn a living".
Ownership is a result of the need to protect excess stock. Excess stock is only produced through agriculture and permanent settlement.
Fire for the man who build the first fence
And him friend who signed paper as evidence
But but but but the world was a violent place before civilization and all this progress you say. The universe is a cold violent machine of brutal indifferent violence you say!!!
Look around and tell me what you see ??? violence and hatred everywhere
It's like we never learn ...[
I don't really know what goodness is but i look at humans and i know it isn't there.
Back then cities like Rome and Mesopotamia would be considered the first world compared to a lot of other areas I think.Because first world, in contrast to the rest of the world, equals being rich.
No time in humanity's history was so violent as when we were hunter/gatherers. Civilization was absolutely a good thing.
shit changed my mindno
We got anime because of it
I don't really know what goodness is but i look at humans and i know it isn't there.
The Sumerians and Mesopotamians would qualify as civilizations
While the case for the progressivist view seems overwhelming, it's hard to prove. How do you show that the lives of people 10,000 years ago got better when they abandoned hunting and gathering for farming? Until recently, archaeologists had to resort to indirect tests, whose results (surprisingly) failed to support the progressivist view. Here's one example of an indirect test: Are twentieth century hunter-gatherers really worse off than farmers? Scattered throughout the world, several dozen groups of so-called primitive people, like the Kalahari bushmen, continue to support themselves that way. It turns out that these people have plenty of leisure time, sleep a good deal, and work less hard than their farming neighbors. For instance, the average time devoted each week to obtaining food is only 12 to 19 hours for one group of Bushmen, 14 hours or less for the Hadza nomads of Tanzania. One Bushman, when asked why he hadn't emulated neighboring tribes by adopting agriculture, replied, "Why should we, when there are so many mongongo nuts in the world?"
Jared Diamond cover this already.
He disagrees:
http://discovermagazine.com/1987/may/02-the-worst-mistake-in-the-history-of-the-human-race
With the data we gathered (no pun intended) with recent gatherers and hunters of the past 200 years, I don't think we can say this for sure. Are there clear evidence that the time when we were hunters and gatherers was that violent between tribes?
To answer the topic though, yes, it's a good thing. The human race won't survive with being stuck on the level of hunting and gathering.
First world luxuries come at the cost of millions of others suffering in slavery though
CHEEZMO;179357576 said:Don't see what that has to do with whether sedentary civilisation and agriculture were good things. If you want to complain about an increase in living standards being made off the surplus produced by those responsible for its creation then complain about capitalism, not make some half-baked, vague point about how maybe primitivism is Cool and Good.
*doesn't spend all day hunting for food before dying at 36 from bad teeth*
Indeed they did, but it was limited to small isolated conflicts, not global wars with slavery and all that shit
How would you know that global wars and slavery was not common at that time.
How would you know that global wars and slavery was not common at that time.
I think the same applies today unfortunately
Not in peace no, but the scale of human suffering has most certainly increased since then.
Yes there is, the worlds oldest society -- Sumerians, had slavery.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Ur-Nammu
Your problems are with Capitalism/Greed. Agriculture comes naturally when you get enough people that don't want to keep traveling long distances to eat.
CHEEZMO;179357912 said:Feel free to replace "bad teeth" with a now-minor and treatable ailment of your choice.
Not in peace no, but the scale of human suffering has most certainly increased since then.
The good fortune of earth and all living beings > than the average lifespan of a single human being though, right?You mean that living longer than 20 years is a bad thing?
People tend to do this a lot, people don't realize that the past was a hellhole.Uh, of course it's good. And inevitable.
Talk about romanticizing the past. Jesus.
Aka natural selection
How would you know that is wasn't
Aka natural selection
People tend to do this a lot, people don't realize that the past was a hellhole.
How can modern times be described as anything else than a hellhole? Unless your focusing on first world civilization only which makes up only a small segment of the entire human populace
We survived and prospered hundreds of thousands of years before though
I don't want to meet anybody who thinks it wasn't. That kind of person can fuck off and die as far as I am concerned.
I think it is pretty ridiculous that you are claiming that pre-agriculture societies did not have slavery when there is really no way we can find out whether or not they did because the records simply arent there. That isnt proof that they didnt have slavery, but it isnt proof that they did have slavery either.
The oldest civilizations did have slavery, and I don't think it is too big of a stretch to think that they simply expanded a practice that already existed while they were hunter-gatherers. That these hunter-gather tribes attacked other groups, killed some, and captured others to be used as slaves, or at least people at the bottom rung of the tribe hierarchy.
Now is that proof? No, but your claim that there is no record of slavery in pre-agricultural societies, so that means that no slavery existed certainly isnt proof either based on the sources that hunter-gatherer societies leave.
could a pre-civilization have created The Last of Us or Driveclub®?
How can modern times be described as anything else than a hellhole? Unless your focusing on first world civilization only which makes up only a small segment of the entire human populace
Why would you bring up slavery in early civilizations in a thread talking about pre-civilization human times? Slaves in a hunter-gatherer society make absolutely no sense where you are using all the food you get from hunting and gathering to feed your tribe before moving on to find more food. Slavery came about when we decided to stay in one place and currency and land became important. You need people to work the land that feeds more than just your family. You get slaves. They would be a hinderance in pre-civilizaton humanity.
could a pre-civilization have created The Last of Us or Driveclub®?