and what would stop them from doing that with wright again?
The difficulties they had before? Why go back to that?
and what would stop them from doing that with wright again?
Marvel really doesn't have a lot of female characters that are obvious candidates for a solo film. Doesn't mean they couldn't dig deeper, but sexism is only part of the problem.
The difficulties came from people who no longer are working with the marvel films. It's just Feige now as opposed to a committee of note makers.The difficulties they had before? Why go back to that?
You're right it came out in December as a limited release if I remember correctly.It came out December 2014, that is why it was able to be a contender for the oscars that year.
If it came out Jan 2015 it wouldn't be able to be a contender for nominations till the next Oscars that have yet to happen.
I didn't know that.I believe the rule is a film has to have a public screening in both NYC and LA by Dec 31st of they calendar year to be eligible for the next years Oscars.
There are all of the TV/Netflix shows as well. Marvel Cinematic Universe has gotten huge.
Yes and no. As a huge fan of the Guardians of the Galaxy, James Gunn did his homework. The characters are incredibly faithful and he absolutely, totally knows their histories down to insane nerd-levels of detail. He did what a good director does and adapted that material in a way he best saw fit, but they were not unrecognizable. The Groot in the films is the Groot I loved years before in the comics.This isn't a huge issue. They're not largely concerned with 100% faithful adaptations, comic book movies rarely are, I hear that GOTG is largely Gunn's invention instead of a strict adaptation of the source material.
This isn't a huge issue. They're not largely concerned with 100% faithful adaptations, comic book movies rarely are, I hear that GOTG is largely Gunn's invention instead of a strict adaptation of the source material.
Give Monica shot
Marvel really doesn't have a lot of female characters that are obvious candidates for a solo film. Doesn't mean they couldn't dig deeper, but sexism is only part of the problem.
Give Monica shot
Rambeau? She has almost no history as a solo protagonist, so she'd fall into the "dig deeper" category.
I'd be for it, though.
My local theater tried to do a Marvel movie marathon. It lasted forever but some people went.
Was it really only 7 years ago that Iron Man came out?
In only 7 years, we've gotten Iron Man, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America, The Avengers, Agents of SHIELD, Agent Peggy Carter, Iron Man 3, Thor 2, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Guardians of the Galaxy, Daredevil, Avengers: Age of Ultron, and Ant-Man, with Jessica Jones later this year.
We now have a shared universe where Daredevil, Thor, Vision, Scarlet Witch, Wasp, and Howard the Duck all co-exist.
All of that created in less than a decade. And we have Black Panther, Captain Marvel, Doctor Strange, The Inhumans, and a new Spider-man on the horizon.
She-Hulk, anyone?
Rambeau? She has almost no history as a solo protagonist, so she'd fall into the "dig deeper" category.
I'd be for it, though.
She-Hulk, anyone?
I'd rather have a shulkie netflix series. Lawyer procedural with cameos from other Netflix heroes
Seriously. I was having a conversation with 12 year old me and this blew his mind. Who would believe it back then?
Black Panther is really 2018? So dudes just going to be doing cameos for 3 years?
It was exciting up to the first Avengers film, but has basically been spinning its wheels since.
Black Panther is really 2018? So dudes just going to be doing cameos for 3 years?
Rambeau? She has almost no history as a solo protagonist, so she'd fall into the "dig deeper" category.
I'd be for it, though.
It was exciting up to the first Avengers film, but has basically been spinning its wheels since.
It was exciting up to the first Avengers film, but has basically been spinning its wheels since.
It was exciting up to the first Avengers film, but has basically been spinning its wheels since.
It came out December 2014, that is why it was able to be a contender for the oscars that year.
If it came out Jan 2015 it wouldn't be able to be a contender for nominations till the next Oscars that have yet to happen.
She-Hulk, anyone?
and the Wasp
Huh?
He has a major part in Civil War and his solo movie is two years after that.
Carol has almost no history as a solo hero
Cameo was too strong of a word. It's just weird having him as a featured character in other movies, and then not giving him a solo film till years later. It comes off as a reaction to the cries for a lack of diversity within Marvel films.
Cameo was too strong of a word. It's just weird having him as a featured character in other movies, and then not giving him a solo film till years later. It comes off as a reaction to the cries for a lack of diversity within Marvel films.
Neither Pym nor Lang has a very long solo history, either.
Her last series before they made her Captain Marvel ran for 50 issues.
That said, I will concede that this had more validity back when I was certain that Ant-Man wouldn't get a sequel. Neither Pym nor Lang has a very long solo history, either.
and what would stop them from doing that with wright again?
Spider-man is premiering in the same film and not getting a movie until 2019.![]()
The current Nick Spencer Ant-Man run is orders of magnitude better than... well potentially Carols ever been. Sure its not super long, but its already offered up tons of material to work with.
I think Carols best plot-arc was when she was getting over alcoholism and shit with Stark in an Iron Man run. But well, can't do that so... *empty shrugging gesture*
Also weird that Ant Man is in between infinity wars. Almost lowers the stakes already, if anyone gets what I mean? Like, there's no way he can be in that much trouble (unless the first is entirely set up)