The Cretan
Member
Maybe I'm wrong, but his looks remind me of Grant Morrison's Joker or All Star Batman and Robin's Joker. I haven't read the latter, I'm judging from a couple of images I saw on google.
Less permanent than this?
"But at the same time it was very painful, like giving birth out of my prick hole."
Trying too hard. But it should appeal to the audience they're going for, I guess.
Imagine the Joker just escapes out of Arkham. His henchmen give him his purple coat and his cane. He rocking his Arkham sweats. Have some vision people.
Best VF character!Looks like Goh Hinogami...
![]()
I like it.
Least they bothering to do something new not just copy what done before and fully embrace a over the top and insane look
This.
If WB had played it safe and just copied the look of either Nicholson or Ledger's Joker everyone would be up in arms about it. They try something new that we haven't seen on screen before and everyone still isn't happy.
I would wait until the film itself (or, at the very least the next trailer) hits before throwing the whole thing under a bus.
But they ARE playing it safe. There's all this side press about how GUYS, THE ROLE IS ACTUALLY CONSUMING JARED LETO, HE MIGHT ACTUALLY START KILLING PEOPLE HE'S SO IN CHARACTER (by mailing dead rats to his co-stars)
How's that "playing it safe"?
Qu'est-ce que c'est?
I agree. Almost embarrassing.I'm sorry but that's terrible.
Because it's the lamest publicity stunt ever and is just riding off of Heath Ledger's coattails by essentially amping up the crazy up to eleven and 'outdo him'?
It's just what I was saying earlier about the fact that Heath Ledger's role means they have to live up to Heath Ledger's performance. They could have just taken it in a different direction instead of advertising it as the acting equivalent of a Halo-killer.Yes, new things try to outdo old things. Good observation.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=659065
The internet really hates everything until they see it in action. Then it is either the greatest thing ever or the worst thing ever that happened to them.
It's just what I was saying earlier about the fact that Heath Ledger's role means they have to live up to Heath Ledger's performance. They could have just taken it in a different direction instead of advertising it as the acting equivalent of a Halo-killer.
Yep. There's no inherent problem with that, it's just the way they're going about it is the lamest thing ever:They haven't mentioned Ledger once. And yes, they're advertising a new, sadistic take of one of pop-fiction's most iconic villains, as played by one of Hollywood's more beloved method actors.