Really interesting to see how people form narratives in their heads based off unreliable memories or hearsay.
I mean, the preview article is getting called click bait now.
http://kotaku.com/xenoblade-chronicles-x-the-kotaku-import-preview-1710008103
"Xenoblade Chronicles X: The Kotaku Import Preview"
Man, what a villain! Must be trying to slander Xenoblade Chronicles X for clicks with a title like that, am I right?
Nevermind that the "boring" part didn't even appear until the author's closing comments and that the majority of the text is spent matter-of-factly describing the game.
I just went through this thread and I didn't see anything -- who called the Kotaku preview clickbait or that it was trying to slander Xenoblade X unfairly? I don't think it's controversial to say that it was one of the few major import previews that got a fair bit of discussion here on GAF (thanks to the title of the thread: Kotaku: Xenoblade Chronicles Import Preview -- 'in one word, it would be “boredom.' and 800 posts later...).
That doesn't mean Kotaku reviewer's opinion is any less valid, but when it was one of the few major publications doing a deep dive of the game, it definitely set the tone around NeoGAF. Which is fine, since now we're getting more reviews and people can look at agreements and disagreements within them, as one does.
The general impression from the import thread was that it was a solid game, but the original was better.
somehow this telephoned into "the game was a disappointment"
Yup, especially in regards to story, which was a huge part of Bebpo's critique (and s/he's a huge fan of MonolithSoft games and their stories).