Oh really, that's good news.
The Polygon review made it sound like it couldn't.
the polygon review, huh? ;p
Oh really, that's good news.
The Polygon review made it sound like it couldn't.
That sounds like the stupidest thing to do.Like I said, Polygon is the outlier, ignore them.
Great reviews all around, I knew this was going to be over 80 metacritic.
More 9s and 10s than a few 7s, so no problem at all.7 is a good score. If someone gave the original that score I wouldn't flinch. Its not like 7 means trash people.
7 is a good score. If someone gave the original that score I wouldn't flinch. Its not like 7 means trash people.
The fact that he's dedicating so much space to the UI is a bit strange for me, And somehow contradictory.
Because he says:
but then
So either it's useless info (not dedicated to you) or useful info, pick one.
So even Polygon mentions that you can turn off the HUD parts.
So this is likely the highest scoring game (so far) in Monolith's history? Amazing if so. Based on the reviews I'm expecting this to be a better game than Xenoblade, which is incredible since I heard XB itself is amazing. Good times.
GameXplain's review states that the characters appear tropey if you don't do any of the Affinity Missions/Side Quests so that would explain why many of the reviews trash the characters -- they likely didn't do any or very little of the Affinity Missions.
It's below Polygon's average review score of 7.2.
Yeah, a japanese reviewer said the same but in someway I think it's nice that we won't have too much tutorials to gone through before be able to explore.Polygon's biggest complaint seems to be the not-so-intuitive presentation of, and lack of explanation for the game's more dense systems. I'm super OK with digging into a video game manual again.
There isn't much of a story and it's spread thin across what's mainly character-driven side quests. It takes multiple hours to unlock the next story mission, and there aren't a lot.
The game's bread and butter are affinity quests, which are goofy little character vignettes.
he's talking about import impression
Xenoblade Chronicles has a metacritic of 92. I doubt X will reach that.
Or people can read their review instead of shitting on it for no reason other than "the score is too low, they're just an outlier!" Actual discussion is better than blanket statements that aren't backed up at all.
Polygon's biggest complaint seems to be the not-so-intuitive presentation of, and lack of explanation for the game's more dense systems. I'm super OK with digging into a video game manual again.
I'm new to the series and I kind of want a great story but I just want to run around naked through the landscapes more than anything.
Wow. That's amazing. I look forward to playing both![]()
7 isn't really a good score for games years and years in the making.
Technically, it's a good score but in all actuality, not really.
monolithsoft is a 1st party studioGlad this is reviewing well. Wii U owners finally getting a high quality exclusive third party title.
Glad this is reviewing well. Wii U owners finally getting a high quality exclusive third party title.
All the 10/10 GameReactor reviews are by the same guy, just translated into different languages
Xenoblade Chronicles has a metacritic of 92. I doubt X will reach that.
Glad this is reviewing well. Wii U owners finally getting a high quality exclusive third party title.
Wasn't that ages ago? Those Eurogamer impressions were pretty solid.
Welp I'm an idiot.monolithsoft is a 1st party studio
monolithsoft is a 1st party studio
This is an internal first party game .......
It's first partyGlad this is reviewing well. Wii U owners finally getting a high quality exclusive third party title.
Polygon said:XENOBLADE'S INABILITY TO CLEARLY DISPLAY INFORMATION IS APPARENT BY LOOKING AT A SHOT OF THE GAME'S UI
Most games take 2-3 years to make so I'm not really sure what you mean. If you divorce how long a game has been in development and just play it for what it is 7 is a fine score. I know gamers get all wrapped up in dev time but like eh, iu really shouldn't.
Xenoblade Chronicles has a metacritic of 92. I doubt X will reach that.
Glad this is reviewing well. Wii U owners finally getting a high quality exclusive third party title.
I'm new to the series and I kind of want a great story but I just want to run around naked through the landscapes more than anything.
Then what are you doing in this thread? Lmao.
Also, some critics should have watched the five part youube video series on Nintendo's channel explaining all the systems of the game lol.
I'm more than aware of that, however OG Xenoblade's strength was in the story and characters.
It was earlier this year during the import launch. GAF was hungry for any impressions and so an infamously negative story was co-opted into a crusade against the game despite several others trying to downplay that viewpoint. No one really knew what to think at the time and thus the spotlight shone brightest on the opinion that appeared most dour.
Also, some critics should have watched the five part youube video series on Nintendo's channel explaining all the systems of the game lol.
That sounds like the stupidest thing to do.
When everyone else is saying one thing and one or two people are offering differing opinions, always, always listen to them.
This isn't stats, reviews aren't empirical, you can't throw out the outlier when it comes to opinions or you will create an echo chamber and be surrounded by "yes" people.
Never throw out the contrarian opinion, you don't have to agree with it or like it but you should read it or listen to it so that you can have a true full picture.
But whatever dude do what you want it's just vidja games...