Mariah Carey said:$350 million PSSSSHHHH
I'm pretty sure if Avatar was released as-is in 1939 it would have done better than Gone with the Wind.
Mariah Carey said:$350 million PSSSSHHHH
Mariah Carey said:$350 million PSSSSHHHH
StoOgE said:Yes, because children's movies making money is the end of the world. The target demo of the chipmunks is not us or critics.
Also, Cameron is god.
There are great kids movies. ET, Goonies, any number of Disney or Pixar films over the years. And then there are films that make your kids suck. You can make a great kids film without hurting the the children watching it.
Adjusted numbers = Number of tickets sold. (Its basically the same, they take the number of tickets sold and multiply it with the inflation index)jamesinclair said:Even better than adjusted grosses Id like to see tickets sold.
When an Avatar ticket costs $15 at Imax and $13 at other 3D locations.....no shit its doing so well.
irfan said:Adjusted numbers = Number of tickets sold. (Its basically the same, they take the number of tickets sold and multiply it with the inflation index)
koam said:I'm pretty sure if Avatar was released as-is in 1939 it would have done better than Gone with the Wind.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htmjamesinclair said:I dont think so. I thought it was just original gross times the general inflation.
So if ticket prices have increased faster than inflation has (which they have), thats not recorded.
C4Lukins said:There are great kids movies. ET, Goonies, any number of Disney or Pixar films over the years. And then there are films that make your kids suck. You can make a great kids film without hurting the the children watching it.
TheQueen'sOwn said:Just ruined my day.
Krev said:No, they won't.
Not while this current regime is alive. Also, their 'classics' are dated concepts in an age where Alvin is the overlord of children's films.
Ignatz Mouse said:Avatar yeah yeah yeah but it really is nice to see that Sherlock Holmes has legs.
I *really* have no interest in Avatar, but much more of this and I'll feel like I havr to see it just to know what people are talking about.
wtf, i think you're the only person at GAF who hasn't seen itI *really* have no interest in Avatar, but much more of this and I'll feel like I havr to see it just to know what people are talking about.
I'm afraid you are buddy. I'm afraid you are.koam said:wtf, i think you're the only person at GAF who hasn't seen ittimes15
irfan said:http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm
Notice the pattern? If you need more help understanding, use the Adjuster on the top right, select 2009 and see
(By inflation index I meant ticket prices which I guess is derived from inflation index, should have worded it better)
I believe they are using overall annual ticket prices for the adjustments.jamesinclair said:Oh I see, they are using an actual ticket only inflation metric. That makes more sense.
Now I just wonder how they break down the 3 different price points for a movie like Avatar (Imax, 3D, 2D)
Better watch a lot of movies in the next few weeks.canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
just pack-up your stuff in advance man!canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
That's 12 years of blue balls they been holding in, man!canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
Never take BO too seriously. If I went by your metric I would have quit movies when TF2 hit 400M.canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
Future said:3d pricetag is definitely helping avatar. Just goes to show what can happen when you take 3d beyond simple gimmick shit. I don't think there was one scene in avatar that looked like it was designed for the viewer to go OMG there is a leaf right in front of my face 3d rocks my socks! Instead, you make a world beautiful enough that you kind of want to see it in 3d cuz you'd feel like you are missin out otherwise
Kung Fu Jedi said:There were plenty of cheap uses of 3D in Avatar as well. Yes, the 3D made the world pop more, but the resorted to similar old tricks from time to time too.
canova said:wow it's Cameron's dick-sucking thread.
If Avatar surpasses TDK in domestic gross, I will retire from movie-watching
Scullibundo said:Just wait. 6 months from now people on this forum will be downlplaying the success and saying 'Of course AVATAR was going to make that much money' and completely forget what a huge gamble the film was (if you forget that Cameron was on board).
Scullibundo said:Just wait. 6 months from now people on this forum will be downlplaying the success and saying 'Of course AVATAR was going to make that much money' and completely forget what a huge gamble the film was (if you forget that Cameron was on board).
DanielPlainview said:much more of this?
it made ONE BILLION dollars in 17 days. How much more do you want? :lol
aznpxdd said:Which scenes are you talking about?
Ignatz Mouse said:For it to be a movie I have interest in watching outside of the phenomenon of its popularity.
I mean, woohoo for the fans and all, and I don't hate it (how could I? I haven't seen it) it just leaves me scratching my head.
Dax01 said:With Avatar's success, hopefully that means we'll be seeing more sci-fi movies in the future.
Talk to me when Iron Man 2 makes 1B in 17 days.canova said:GAF is like that.
Last year it was all TDK, TDK this, TDK that. Now it's Avatar this, Avatar that.
in 6 months, they will be Iron-Man 2 this, Iron-Man 2 that
Scullibundo said:Get ready for some Titanic level backlash people.
You act like this is limited to GAF.canova said:GAF is like that.
Last year it was all TDK, TDK this, TDK that. Now it's Avatar this, Avatar that.
in 6 months, they will be Iron-Man 2 this, Iron-Man 2 that
I disagree but we'll see. IronMan's capitalizing all the success in Spiderman's absence, I'll make this judgement (over-saturated) if/when SM4 bombs.StoOgE said:Star Trek, District 9 and Avatar all but assure SciFi will be making a resurgence.
My guess is the super hero genre has become over-saturated and is about to bust in the next 2-3 years. SciFi will be replacing it.
Not possible, ready to eat PD level of crow if this comes true.ryutaro's mama said:Talk to me when Iron Man 2 makes 1B in 17 days.
But superhero movies are a subgenre of the science fiction genre...StoOgE said:Star Trek, District 9 and Avatar all but assure SciFi will be making a resurgence.
My guess is the super hero genre has become over-saturated and is about to bust in the next 2-3 years. SciFi will be replacing it.
Hopefully this means Universal will throw some real money Twohy and Cauron's way. Well, maybe not Twohy. He seems to do better when he is constricted by budget.
StoOgE said:Star Trek, District 9 and Avatar all but assure SciFi will be making a resurgence.
My guess is the super hero genre has become over-saturated and is about to bust in the next 2-3 years. SciFi will be replacing it.
Spike Spiegel said:But superhero movies are a subgenre of the science fiction genre...![]()