Star Wars VII doesn't respect the original trilogy (spoilers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are a lot of people ITT and they have all sorts of different beefs. I was referring to people who say that it made the OT irrelevant.

Gotcha. Sorry about that then. It's getting late and my head is getting fuzzy.

Was the republic decimated? If it really does control the majority of the galaxy, that means thousands of star systems. They got one blast off that destroyed what looked like several bodies in a solar system or a couple of planets in different ones maybe? Did I misinterpret the scene?

They destroyed the Republic home world on Coruscant, I believe.

Do you expect every one of the Core 3 to regress from where progressed to at the end of ROTJ?

Either you're being purposefully obtuse or you didn't read my post.

After the highest of highs (defeating the embodiment of evil), there's nowhere to go but down.

I don't see the realistic forward momentum of lives fully lived as regression.
 
There are a lot of people ITT and they have all sorts of different beefs. I was referring to people who say that it made the OT irrelevant.



Was the republic decimated? If it really does control the majority of the galaxy, that means thousands of star systems. They got one blast off that destroyed what looked like sevjeral bodies in a solar system or a couple of planets in different ones maybe? Did I misinterpret the scene?

The FO did the equivalent of wiping out Washington DC while the President was in the White House and both the House and Senate were in session.

The entire Senate and a good chunk of their fleet. It's all in Hux's Nazi speech.

They destroyed the Republic home world on Coruscant, I believe.

Hosnian system, Hosnian Prime to be specific.
 

Tesseract

Banned
life goes on, generations pass, the seeds of the dark side linger

your heroes aren't immutable anymore, han's death made that clearer than jeff goldblum's urine
 
That would be pretty lame if the planning of palpitine was someone else's. He was an immensely powerful Sith who disrupted the Jedi's precog.

When I first saw ROTJ as a kid, I thought it was lame that there was an old dude ordering Vader around. He was a badass who could choke people with his mind.

Besides, Palpitine had a master once, remember? Darth Plagueus, whom he mentions in ROTS.
Hell, maybe Snoke is Plagueus.
*Possible new trilogy spoiler, though I have no insider knowledge*

The FO did the equivalent of wiping out Washington DC while the President was in the White House and both the House and Senate were in session.

The entire Senate and a good chunk of their fleet. It's all in Hux's Nazi speech.



Hosnian system, Hosnian Prime to be specific.

Oops, thank you.
Damn, I was hoping it was Coruscant so maybe Jar Jar would be dead.

Sorry, I'm not 100% boned up on the new film yet.
 
Do you expect every one of the Core 3 to regress from where progressed to at the end of ROTJ?

Either you're being purposefully obtuse or you didn't read my post.

Luke didn't regress he's just on a completely different path. Leia has continued the fight which is a logical outcome as she was always more of a military commander type anyway. Only person who regressed was Han amd given what happened that is 100% in character and he's still a better person then he was before.
 

Xe4

Banned
Totally different situation. The Enterprise and its crew members came part and parcel as part of the reboot. It wouldn't be a reboot without them. It'd be a whole new series. Also, Trek has never shied away from introducing new characters and only linking itself tangentially to what came before. One only need look at TNG, Voyager, DS9, etc. to see that.

Star Wars has always been about the Skywalker family and its effect on the galaxy. Why would they end that legacy now?

Well the movies have (half of which people complained about incessantly). There was tons of content in Star Wars not at all about the Skywalker family. Hell some of the best stuff that ever came out of star wars had little to do with Luke, or the rebellion. It may have taken place during an entire different time period.

It's an entire Galaxy, you can have more than just one story about one movement. There's nothing stopping them from having the star wars "feel" whiLe not being about Luke or Han or Leia or any of that. I know he they did it. Nostalgia sells, always will, and Disney knew for damn sure more people would see the film if it had characters from the OT than if they didnt.
 

UrokeJoe

Member
I have the same feeling. I personally found the movie enjoyable until Han Solo's appearance and then it just began to fall apart.

This. Like he would just walk out there and correct his psycho son with some stern words as if Leia put a Jedi mind trick on him.
 

AxelFoley

Member
Force Awakens is better than the OT in almost every way.

Rey, Finn and Poe are a much stronger trio of lead characters
(plus more diverse). BB-8 is so much cuter and funnier than C3PO, that little robot just steals the show whereas C3PO just grates on your nerves. Visual design in TFA is much nicer.

The music and villain are better in the OT though. Emo Andy Samberg in a mask just can't compare to Vader and Palpatine.


Yeah, no.
 

BadAss2961

Member
Hyperbole much?

The consensus will never be that TFA is worse than the PT.

But rather than join the discussion, you'd rather minimize it. Congrats.
I actually have no clue since i'm not even a fan. But I like reading thoughts about the movie.

I'm just noticing the same cycle every film of this magnitude goes through these days. It only gets worse from here.
 

danm999

Member
I'm not really seeing why Luke and Han having adapted poorly to peacetime, or being in a worse position than they were at the end of Jedi is disrespectful to the OT honestly.

Just because they overcame particular challenges decades ago does not mean they will never fail to overcome similar changes, or that their lives need to be on constant positive trajectories.

People fail and succeed at various times in their lives, and the story of men and women who fight in destructive conflicts and flourish, only to have difficulty adapting to peacetime and new lives is neither unbelievable or disrespectful a development.

It really reads like you didn't enjoy The Force Awakens, which is fine, but trying to hide your dislike behind the notion the film "disrespected" the previous movies seems like a cop out.
 
Well the movies have (half of which people complained about incessantly). There was tons of content in Star Wars not at all about the Skywalker family. Hell some of the best stuff that ever came out of star wars had little to do with Luke, or the rebellion. It may have taken place during an entire different time period.

It's an entire Galaxy, you can have more than just one story about one movement. There's nothing stopping them from having the star wars "feel" whiLe not being about Luke or Han or Leia or any of that. I know he they did it. Nostalgia sells, always will, and Disney knew for damn sure more people would see the film if it had characters from the OT than if they didnt.

Exactly. It's about money, and they know they have to link the trilogy to the past to move forward.

However, now that the link is established, they're free to expand outward.

Here's hoping.
 

Timbuktu

Member
Then Episode VIII comes out and people will say this is the best SW ever. The cycle continues

My view on TFA depends a great deal on how Episode VIII turns out. TFA did a lot of the functional work to bring the audience back and lay the groundwork for the new generation. It's only worth it if the next film is great and we get something more inventive, another remix off the originals will not do.
 

UrokeJoe

Member
My view on TFA depends a great deal on how Episode VIII turns out. TFA did a lot of the functional work to bring the audience back and lay the groundwork for the new generation. It's only worth it if the next film is great and we get something more inventive, another remix off the originals will not do.

Very much this.
 

Brakke

Banned
Was the republic decimated? If it really does control the majority of the galaxy, that means thousands of star systems. They got one blast off that destroyed what looked like several bodies in a solar system or a couple of planets in different ones maybe? Did I misinterpret the scene?

There's a couple things there. The planets that got bopped represented the entire Republic Federal government and its entire (or damn near close to) fleet. However in one of the books, it seems that Mon Mothma, leader of the Republic, had undertaken a demilitarization campaign after the rebellion won. So systems were responsible for most of their own local defense.

We might imagine that going forward the remnants of the Republic (basically the Resistance and Leia I guess) racing the Order in a quest to recruit or conquer systems that have military capacity of their own?
 
After the highest of highs (defeating the embodiment of evil), there's nowhere to go but down.

I don't see the realistic forward momentum of lives fully lived as regression.
Luke didn't regress he's just on a completely different path. Leia has continued the fight which is a logical outcome as she was always more of a military commander type anyway. Only person who regressed was Han amd given what happened that is 100% in character and he's still a better person then he was before.

Sure. No regression.

That happened big picture at the end of ROTJ and the Republic formed shortly thereafter.

At the End of ROTJ:

Leia, now a Commander, was victorious and learned she was Force sensitive, opening up all sorts of exciting possibilities.

Han, no longer a smuggler, was now a General and helped topple the Empire.

Luke redeemed his father and brought balance to the Force.

Absolutely nothing was undone, eh?

As for the Start of TFA, let's review:

Leia is back to commanding a small Resistance group on Not Yavin 4. She doesn't seem to use the Force for much at all.

Han is back to being a smuggler.

Luke failed at starting a new Jedi Order, his nephew fell to the dark side and slaughtered his pupils. Then Luke left for...reasons.

How are any of them improved over the last 30 years? How was nothing undone? It's like a HS reunion where the most popular kids in class made no real progression in life.
 

Xe4

Banned
Exactly. It's about money, and they know they have to link the trilogy to the past to move forward.

However, now that the link is established, they're free to expand outward.

Here's hoping.

Cheers to that. I'm gonna end this conversation for the night. Hopefully it's still going on in the morning. I really hope Rogue One is good and different enough so that Disney will take more risks with the franchise in the future. It's an amazing galaxy and tons of room for potential, but not if they keep the focus of the movies on one family, and one group (the Jedi and or Sith).
 
I actually have no clue since i'm not even a fan. But I like reading thoughts about the movie.

I'm just noticing the same cycle every film of this magnitude goes through these days. It only gets worse from here.

Right on.

You're still my favorite post-NBA-GAF poster. The Jimmy Butler of this Era, if you will.
 

Astral Dog

Member
So many people responses seem to imply the world of Star Wars is more dark than it appears, with constant conflict, corruption, death and hopelessness. interesting, you would not think that from George Lukas words.
 
The FO did the equivalent of wiping out Washington DC while the President was in the White House and both the House and Senate were in session.

The entire Senate and a good chunk of their fleet. It's all in Hux's Nazi speech.



Hosnian system, Hosnian Prime to be specific.


A decapitating strike like that shouldn't be fatal unless they can follow it up with more and more strikes. The speech from Hux said that the weapon would bring an end to their fleet, not that that specific strike would. Thousands of systems, quadrillions of sentients, and presumably a fleet not exclusively parked outside their capital city. The FO fleet better hope it's up to the task of conquering everything really really fast because otherwise it's gonna get crushed by glorious industry!

Nah it's SW, they'll need to defeat Snoke in a duel to make the FO lose :p
 
Maybe, and this is a stretch, but maybe we don't know the whole story yet until the next (2?) movies are out. I'm assuming Luke will answer some questions then.
 

John Harker

Definitely doesn't make things up as he goes along.
They've all regressed. That makes sense to you? Y/N

Playing your game I'll say "yes" of course it makes sense to me.

Though I'm not sure your definition of regression.

Leia is a general now, still fighting for what she believes in. She wasn't a general before, her rank was pretty low, so that sounds like a promotion to me. Also she Gained a lot of senatorial power, and before she was a princess without a kingdom. So, again doesnt sound like a regression to me. She also got married and had a child - again, doesn't sound like a regression, those are presumably things she wanted. 34 years ago she couldn't have predicted her son was going to go crazy and kill her husband... So that sounds like SHIT HAPPENS to me. Her and Han having s rocky marriage? That was written on the wall in every scene 34 years ago.

Luke was the last Jedi and built a presumably large Acacemy, training a bunch of new Jedi. Most people 34 years ago didn't even know the force was any more then a myth, so that sounds like progress to me - even getting the word out about Jedi's and gaining the trust of parents to send them children when the only force wielded was a Pyscho mystic dressed in all black terrorizing the Galaxy... Damn sounds like to me he was doing a mighty fine job. Could he have predicted Ren going crazy and whoever the hell Snoke is coming in and killing everyone? More SHIT HAPPENS. Him retreating to find ancient Jedi temples is something we will be to learn about later because the rest of what he was doing is just speculation... He was in the movie for 30 sec!!!

Han went "home." That makes a ton of sense to me, he was looking for something that made him feel sane in a world where his son kills children. He acted exactly what I would have expected given his character 34 years ago. Is that regression? The sheer fact the stood up to his son instead of running away from him, shows me the exact opposite... That's character growth.

A LIFETIME has happened to these people.
Far more we don't know about than we do. Just because it isn't what you EXPECTED and WANTED for them, doesn't mean it isn't mysterious and exciting... Use your imagination a bit. That's what good story telling does... Gives us 15 pages of discussion, and 2 more years before the page turns.

Bravo.
 
Sure. No regression.

Umm ok that's not really a retort. I explained why it's not regression., it isn't. Luke has not regressed he's simply gone down a darker path and neither has Leia she's become a military leader, Han did but in this movie he's still very muched changed, a firm believer in the Force now, and his actions make sense.

So yes you're completely inaccurate to call change regression.
 

JB1981

Member
The movie follows the JJ Abrams and Damon Lindelof pattern of spamming nonsensical things hard enough that you suspend your disbelief about the questionable thing that just happened, because another questionable thing is about to happen and you'd like to keep up. You're sure it all adds up in the end so you enjoy the ride.

But in the end it doesn't add up, itsfuckingnothing.gif. Many won't look back, or won't care because to them it's all about what they felt at the time of watching the movie. And that's ok, feel free to love the movie; I won't hold it against you.

For others, like me, I want to see the receipts. I'm not talking about minutiae, I'm talking about major asspulls, of which there are dozens in this movie.

So I think the movie is absolutely horrid and completely vapid. Abrams eschewed actually making this movie for real. The OP is correct that it disrespects the OT, but it's also a massive ripoff of the major story beats of Ep 4 at the same time. Embarrassing.

Care to elaborate on these dozens of asspulls?
 
I'm not really seeing why Luke and Han having adapted poorly to peacetime, or being in a worse position than they were at the end of Jedi is disrespectful to the OT honestly.

Just because they overcame particular challenges decades ago does not mean they will never fail to overcome similar changes, or that their lives need to be on constant positive trajectories.

People fail and succeed at various times in their lives, and the story of men and women who fight in destructive conflicts and flourish, only to have difficulty adapting to peacetime and new lives is neither unbelievable or disrespectful a development.

It really reads like you didn't enjoy The Force Awakens, which is fine, but trying to hide your dislike behind the notion the film "disrespected" the previous movies seems like a cop out.

I agree. True disrespect of the OT and regressions for its characters would involve Han either being caught and murdered offscreen by one of the people to whom he was indebted or drinking himself into an early grave to silence the forever-echoing death scream of Greedo. Meanwhile, the Skywalker twins give in to their shameful lust, their union bringing to life a deformed monstrosity powerful enough to blink life out of existence but only focused on amusing itself by creating sculptures from the strange brown "clay" that keeps falling from the hole in its backside.

Luckily, TFA avoided this completely.
 
I think it would have been really interesting if they pulled a Zeta Gundam and had the First Order be the plucky rebels and made the New Republic a corrupt, semi-fascist regime.

The backlash awakens. In another couple months this will be the worst movie ever.

It's like poetry.
 
A decapitating strike like that shouldn't be fatal unless they can follow it up with more and more strikes. The speech from Hux said that the weapon would bring an end to their fleet, not that that specific strike would. Thousands of systems, quadrillions of sentients, and presumably a fleet not exclusively parked outside their capital city. The FO fleet better hope it's up to the task of conquering everything really really fast because otherwise it's gonna get crushed by glorious industry!

Nah it's SW, they'll need to defeat Snoke in a duel to make the FO lose :p

He literally said this is the last day of the Republic, he knows their fleet is stationed where the Senate is. He says this strike will wipe out the Senate and fleet. There is now a massive power vacuum.

I did not say fatal. I said chaotic and power vacuum. Fatal would mean a new Empire, the failure to wipe out Leia's group, the declaration of war that that first strike represents and the loss of Starkiller base should ensure that they are not in position to just take over. It's gonna be a fight with no clear power. So unlike the OT which had an Empire and the PT which had a Republic this one should have no clear ruling group.
 

Sandfox

Member
I personally like the direction they took the old characters because it both allows the new generation to shine and leaves us asking questions that will be answered as more content around this time frame is released. I don't really feel any of the characters were betrayed.
 

Timbuktu

Member
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree here. Lucas was criticized precisely because the prequels were only Star Wars in name. Everything else felt wooden and artificial.

Most criticism against TFA is that it's too slavish in its devotion to feeling like the OT, in style and in story.

I think the shadow of the prequels looms large in TFA as well. As much as it apes the OT, you just know that this wouldn't follow on that story in this way if the prequels didn't exist and we didn't get that backlash against Lucas that tells us exactly what defines 'Star Wars' for the fans.

My fiancee never watched the OT so we did a rewatch last year, but i didnt make her go through the prequels. TFA's fault were a lot more apparent to her because she didn't need it to 'fix' what got broken in the prequels.
 

Well, people are gonna debate and theorize it over and over again most likely, one or more of the prevailing theories will be true so people won't feel like they were shocked or whatever.

It's like not like, say, GRRM where he never lets his readers feel like there are safe characters.

SW will likely follow one or more of the same "poetry" story archs, just like the ones before it. I don't think it will sneak up on anyone, narratively.
 
Might as well leave the thread if you're only looking for people to agree with you. Discussions are pretty useless only one-sided.

Mirrors work better.

There is not point in continuing this discussion with YOU.

We are at an impasse.

I said nothing about the rest of the thread.

He's not even explaining how they've regressed, he just keeps claiming it.

I made it crystal clear what I thought. Maybe you are stuck on the word "regress".

Whatever word you want to use to describe it, the Core 3 characters have taken huge steps back from the progressions they made in the OT.
 

Eidan

Member
I'm kinda of surprised this thread is as large as it is. The OP's post is literally just complaining about the heroes in the OT not having happy endings, and TFA feeling derivative of ANH, a common critique seen in every TFA birthed since the movie came out.
 

Tesseract

Banned
There is not point in continuing this discussion with YOU.

We are at an impasse.

I said nothing about the rest of the thread.



I made it crystal clear what I thought. Maybe you are stuck on the word "regress".

Whatever word you want to use to describe it, the Core 3 characters have taken huge steps back from the progressions they made in the OT.

aging does that to you, boro
 
I think the shadow of the prequels looms large in TFA as well. As much as it apes the OT, you just know that this wouldn't follow on that story in this way if the prequels didn't exist and we didn't get that backlash against Lucas that tells us exactly what defines 'Star Wars' for the fans.

My fiancee never watched the OT so we did a rewatch last year, but i didnt make her go through the prequels. TFA's fault were a lot more apparent to her because she didn't need it to 'fix' what got broken in the prequels.

Obviously the purpose of TFA was as much to patch and avoid the pitfalls of the past as it was to build for the future. Which is actually something I admire most about it. It had every reason in the world to be an incoherent mess, but other than a question mark here or there, it was pretty damn good.
 

Jigorath

Banned
I don't agree with a lot of the OP but

Luke's Lightsaber:
This is the most idiotic attempt by the film to 'respect' the original trilogy. In all of Star Wars' cinematic history, lightsabers were mere tools to a Jedi. An elegant weapon and nothing more. But now, lightsabers are mystical entities. They can "call to you", not unlike how the One Ring calls to Frodo in 'The Lord of the Rings'.

Yeah this was kind of silly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom