Who do you think oh wise one?![]()
I can promise free blowjobs, a $25 minimum wage, free health care, and 3 months of paid time off from work per year. Would it make your life better? Sure. Does it have a chance of happening? No, it's fantasy just like Bernie's plan.
Fucking This.
Let me spell this out for that particular junior member.
Minorities have had white politicians floating in promising them the moon since before the civil rights era, and the vast majority of said politicians are full of shit. Naturally, minority voters- especially black voters- are extremely skeptical.
Black Voters backed Clinton right up until Obama proved he wasn't Jesse Jackson 2.0 by getting white voters to carry him to victory in Iowa.
Bernie's entire rhetoric of "dismantle the banks", "free college", "revamp the tax structure", etc etc has been met with a resounding "oh yeah? how?" from every single minority voter I can think of, and there is not one single valid explanation as to how any of what bernie wants to do gets past a republican congress.
Until he manages to prove he's more than just talk, he's going to strike out with minorities as he has been for months. As it is, Bernie's rhetoric isn't any more realistic than Trump claiming to put up walls to keep out mexicans.
Self defeatism is not a reason to accept status quo.
this is his first win for the season so i guess he wants to get his whole spill out. they should be much shorter weeks from now
Seriously. The Clinton supporters who come by to shitpost on practically every page in these threads about 'how Sanders has no chance and Hillary is more realistic and pragmatic' is really kind of insufferable.
I mean, god forbid that people be actually mildly happy for one evening that a politician like Sanders won a presidential primary in the United States. We should instead probably want more years of always-moving-right Democratic Party and be content with that.
You act like Clinton being a corporate shill isn't a known thing? Wow you really trapped me there!
To the 2nd part of your post:
And there it is. Typical Clinton supporter not wanting to push for hard things because they are hard.
i love dreams too.
The key is negotiation. How about a $25 dollar blowjob, every 3 months, at the doctor's office?
Do we have proof of this or just going off the fact she had nyc donors from her time as senator?I dont know, maybe the candidate who is a corporate shill?
If thats your attitude then you should vote for the policies you want, not talk about how they are "too hard to pass". Great attitude. Nothing will change with that line of thinking.
My money would be on Trump if I had to bet, but my confidence level isn't too high. Not yet
To a certain extent, absolutely.I suspect the fact that she will be the first female nominee for president for either party makes her perspective sort of fresh no matter if her last name is Clinton or not.
I love this assumption that Hillary would accomplish all of her plans, some of them, or even more of them than Bernie would of his.
Congress is geared to obstruct. I think Bernie will do a better job than Hillary of inspiring progressives and mobilizing voter turnout out during mid terms, and "actually get things done" when it comes to changing the makeup of congress. Of course this is all speculation - but the patronizing "fantasy!!" Defeatist attitude towards proposals that many would find preferable needs to be toned down.
I can promise free blowjobs, a $25 minimum wage, free health care, and 3 months of paid time off from work per year. Would it make your life better? Sure. Does it have a chance of happening? No, it's fantasy just like Bernie's plan.
Lol, but seriously you are right that negotiation is key. Bernie doesn't negotiate. Hilary is a master negotiator.
Seriously. The Clinton supporters who come by to shitpost on practically every page in these threads about 'how Sanders has no chance and Hillary is more realistic and pragmatic' is really kind of insufferable.
I mean, god forbid that people be actually mildly happy for one evening that a politician like Sanders won a presidential primary in the United States. We should instead probably want more years of always-moving-right Democratic Party and be content with that.
Liberal and young voters sit out the midterms. A lot of Bernie's base wouldn't show up in 2018. So what you're saying is, you'd put up with two years of Bernie getting nothing done for another two years where he continues getting blocked.
Do we know who writes his speeches? He should hire someone new to work with him. His campaign ideas are pretty clear at this point, it's time to freshen things up.
It must be sobering to settle for genuine mediocrity.
But that's just the American way, right? Being "realistic" with substandard states of affairs.
Congress will obstruct any Democrat. Why not back the Democrat that won't attempt to compromise just for movement? There is no honor or reason in reaching out to the side that continuously moves the goalposts just to prove a point. The right does not want compromise, they want capitulation. Pragmatism in this case is knowing that the right is controlled by the freedom caucus.which means what, exactly?
understanding that congress as it stands (and will likely stand for the next decade) will simply obstruct literally everything bernie proposes exactly as they do to Obama isn't being "self defeatist" it's being realistic.
none of that will come anywhere close to passing a vote much less getting out of committee. It's borderline insulting to even bring it up. Preferring a candidate that doesn't treat voters like children and tempers the rhetoric to the "possible" rather than "wishful thinking" isn't "defeatist", this is maturity.
Any change that's coming will be long, hard, and incremental, and NOT on the backs of a revolution Sanders doesn't have the political will to pull off. If it existed, Occupy wall street wouldn't have flamed out into nothing, now would it?
It's possible to have Bernie's plans. No it's not easy, but it's his ideas are based off of other countries. The only thing stopping him is the congress/senate. federalism, the supreme court, the consitution, people who don't agree with him, racism, etc
Bernie needs to end this speech like 5 minutes ago, jfc
Absolutely baloney.
Doing pretty well down here in Atlanta. The black middle class in this city isn't where it was before the recession, but its gone really well.
Has things got worse for black americans where you are at?
I'm black and I support Hilary, wanna fight?
I love this assumption that Hillary would accomplish all of her plans, some of them, or even more of them than Bernie would of his.
Congress is geared to obstruct. I think Bernie will do a better job than Hillary of inspiring progressives and mobilizing voter turnout out during mid terms, and "actually get things done" when it comes to changing the makeup of congress. Of course this is all speculation - but the patronizing "fantasy!!" Defeatist attitude towards proposals that many would find preferable needs to be toned down.
Congress will obstruct any Democrat. Why not back the Democrat that won't attempt to compromise just for movement? There is no honor or reason in reaching out to the side that continuously moves the goalposts just to prove a point. The right does not want compromise, they want capitulation. Pragmatism in this case is knowing that the right is controlled by the freedom caucus.
1) Hillary is smarter than Bernie
2)Hillary is KNOWN for her obsession with minutiae. She is very detail oriented.
Lol. It's weird how opinions work, huh?
If you don't agree with me, you prefer mediocrity and the failure of the American way! YEAH!
Seems like this speech is for those that don't know him yet.
Absolutely baloney.
Man... Finally catching up and watching the Hillary Concession Speech. Is anyone else annoyed by her essentially taking Bernie's talking points?
Shes been involved in politics for almost 25 years... There is nothing fresh about her. Being a female means nothing nor should it mean anything.
Is it defeatist to prefer the agenda that relies significantly more on executive actions than the agenda that relies significantly more on legislative actions?