Eurogamer: AC art used for Uncharted 4 trailer (Up: Naughty Dog responds)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm pretty sure this wasnt an honest mistake as the pirate was photoshopped out. Caught art stealing and now trying to lie about it.

Someone probably took it off Google and edited the pic with out knowing it was Ubis. Stupid mistake but not stealing, and that person will likely be fired.
 
Well, the updated picture is still stolen and I think Naughty Dog needs to be under serious investigation for theft.

TwUED8p.jpg
I knew the image was familiar from something I recently saw lol
Nice catch
:}
 
Well, the updated picture is still stolen and I think Naughty Dog needs to be under serious investigation for theft.

TwUED8p.jpg

funny guy lmao

Someone probably took it off Google and edited the pic with out knowing it was Ubis. Stupid mistake but not stealing, and that person will likely be fired.

I know this can be very serious issue, if the companies want it to be but I hope not. I also hope the guy doesn't get fired due to this misstep. But again it could've been or potential be serious, i really hope not
 
Hacks, I tell ya. Nothing but a bunch of hacks:



OldEquatorialBactrian.gif


Anyway, don't pin the fuck up of one person on the team that created what you see above you. Not to mention the body of work they have already established.

That looks impressive and all, but how's the fish AI? In other words, do they move out of the way when the player gets near?
 
It's why I fear this industry will truly never grow up. From some journalists, to gaming personalities to even this. People are too caught up in "Gotcha" moments.

yeah even going back to the original dig at Ubi about female character animations, for peers working on the same type of stuff it is just generally shitty to call each other out like that ESPECIALLY considering how tough it is to make games these days
 
Stealing art and claiming it as your own is a major no no. To say it was just a simple mistake is a direct insult to the artist who drew that.

but it was a mistake?

yeah it's shitty but they're not doubling down on it, it was an individual's action and the company obviously isn't okay with it
 
Anyway, don't pin the fuck up of one person on the team that created what you see above you. Not to mention the body of work they have already established.

Well rationally there was probably more than One person involved in this.

- At least one person possibly collected and used the art without the permission of the copyright holder [Ubisoft]

- At least one person was supposedly in charge of 'vetting' the artwork for release, to avoid conflict of interest this should not be the same person(s) as above.

- The Management for whatever reason allows non licensed artwork to be used during production (or else they wouldn't have a vetting person)...

For this to happen (at least twice now) it seems to be a collection of people fucking up.
 
Stealing art and claiming it as your own is a major no no. To say it was just a simple mistake is a direct insult to the artist who drew that.

No it isn't.

Now if they had just said fuck you we are using it for free, then that would be a direct insult.
 
I know this can be very serious issue, if the companies want it to be but I hope not. I also hope the guy doesn't get fired due to this misstep. But again it could've been or potential be serious, i really hope not
I think that will depend if it was a likely mistake or not. I mean, if it happened intentionally they have every reason to fire him. One, because he steals art and two because he doesn't do the job they're paying him for.
 
now that I've reflected on this a bit it does kind of strike me as unprofessional for the Ubisoft person to go immediately to twitter with all of this rather than try and handle it with ND privately.

it's also unprofessional so steal art so I guess it's a wash


I'm with you. Ubisoft should apologize to Naughty Dog. It's just art.
 
yeah even going back to the original dig at Ubi about female character animations, for peers working on the same type of stuff it is just generally shitty to call each other out like that ESPECIALLY considering how tough it is to make games these days

Yep. You don't even have to say it like that. A general comment about inclusiveness was all that was needed.

Like you guys are all in the same industry. Working hard, plagued with shitty hours etc.
 
For the mood of the shot. In the storyboard it was probably used to show the first view of the environment. You don't want a character in shot for that. We quickly clone stamp objects out of screens all the time to convey the mood or look we want. Because its supposed to be a very quick read as a story board you take out any elements that don't pertain to the story.

Could have overlay something across or in the corner of the pic , to serves as a reminder that its a placeholder and due to be replaced
 
so what are you suggesting they should have done other than admit it, apologize, and fix it?

Well I would say the next step is to talk about what they are going to do differently. There is clearly a problem when they've been caught red handed twice for this, and at least once for taking someone's likeness for their characters. That's a pattern that needs to be addressed I think.
 
Well I would say the next step is to talk about what they are going to do differently. There is clearly a problem when they've been caught red handed twice for this, and at least once for taking someone's likeness for their characters. That's a pattern that needs to be addressed I think.

wait are you throwing the whole ellen page TLOU shenanigans into this? really?
 
Well I would say the next step is to talk about what they are going to do differently. There is clearly a problem when they've been caught red handed twice for this, and at least once for taking someone's likeness for their characters. That's a pattern that needs to be addressed I think.

Ok...who are you talking about here?
 
How can something like that even happen? I am right when I assume that someone at some point must have consciously taken the picture knowing its someone elses artwork?
 
lol
I'm sure he won't get fired.

Unless you work for ND or Sony you can't know that. It's possible the same individual caused the problem with the copied map in TLOU too. This would be two straight games.

I'm pretty sure this wasnt an honest mistake as the pirate was photoshopped out. Caught art stealing and now trying to lie about it.

Huh to the last part? That doesn't seem to be the case at all... ND fessed up fast.
 
I feel like it was just an employee who was feeling lazy and decided to use an image that he thought nobody would ever recognize. I really dont think everyone working on UC4 just went "let's steal some art from someone else! Yeah!"

Unfortunately, we'll never know exactly what happened but it's good that they apologized quickly.
 
I'm pretty sure this wasnt an honest mistake as the pirate was photoshopped out. Caught art stealing and now trying to lie about it.

Your, concerns (ahem) has already been addressed many times over in this thread.
But carry on if it scratches some sort of itch you've been carrying.
 
Going to Google and getting a random image without checking if its even copyright is definitely stealing.

Yes but don't make it seem like everyone at Naughty Dog was complicit in this. I mean I had no idea what the original painting was from and wouldn't expect those who approved the trailer's release to know. It's not the Mona Lisa. It's some random art from a game that not many people played or paid attention to.
 
Well rationally there was probably more than One person involved in this.

- At least one person possibly collected and used the art without the permission of the copyright holder [Ubisoft]

- At least one person was supposedly in charge of 'vetting' the artwork for release, to avoid conflict of interest this should not be the same person(s) as above.

- The Management for whatever reason allows non licensed artwork to be used during production...

For this to happen (at least twice now) it seems to be a collection of people fucking up.

Could be, but I am not going to pin it on the entire team who are obviously some of the best in the business and had no idea about this. Yet I do think it was done with full knowledge based on the pirate being shopped out and it certainly is not okay just because it's Naughty Dog. Which is why I would not be surprised if at least one person gets canned over it.
 
How can something like that even happen? I am right when I assume that someone at some point must have consciously taken the picture knowing its someone elses artwork?
You are assuming right. Somebody just Google images this shit and put it in the game. They probably thought it was from a random artists that would never notice the theft, but it ended up being artwork from another AAA game.
 
The Ellen Page thing is debatable, but this one is imo pretty cut and dry

dda5CnC.jpg

it's not any more cut & dry than Ellie and Ellen Page IMO but they definitely are super similar and for this type of thing to be questioned twice in the same game is definitely suspect so fair enough.
 
Nothing is entirely original in the real sense of the word and if we had to put citation for every image that's influenced our work. It all becomes academic
 
Yes but don't make it seem like everyone at Naughty Dog was complicit in this. I mean I had no idea what the original painting was from and wouldn't expect those who approved the trailer's release to know. It's not the Mona Lisa. It's some random art from a game that not many people played or paid attention to.
I dont think anyone is saying ND as whole is responsible for this, but the guy that was tasked with the job of finding or making the image to put in that frame was definitely responsible and definitely stealing.
 
You are assuming right. Somebody just Google images this shit and put in the game. They probably thought it was from a random artistas that would never notice the theft, but it ended up being artwork from another AAA game.
Whoever pulled the image might also not have expected that it would be featured prominently in a cutscene.
 
Nothing is entirely original in the real sense of the word and if we had to put citation for every image that's influenced our work. It all becomes academic

I agree with your sentiment but being influenced by something is very different than literally stealing art.
 
They do seem to be hacks walking around in artist's clothing sometimes.

That's why the Druckman thing always bugged me, based on what little info was available. It seemed as though people let him believe he was making the The Road when really he just made a zombie movie after that sort of thing was way overdone.

From there, the egos probably ran the joint. I thought all three Indiana Jones rip offs were more novel than the zombie rip off.

Well they say opinions are like ass holes, but mine can't possibly smell this bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom