I really had not noticed it at all to be honest.
Alright, it was so expensive that they fired the production staff because of the huge expense.
That better? Making everything from scratch is expensive, and AAA production is insanely expensive as it is. The more asset reuse, the more games we get in general.
Does Primal have like seven or eight missions as a 3-4 hour campaign? If not, I'm wondering why people keep comparing it to Blood Dragon.
Can you kill someone in Primal and then boot up FC4 and dig up their bones!?
LOL, no. It is a huge game with oodles of content. Which is why it's $60.
I imagine that the people who bought this game won't care. This is the kind of thing expected from this game. So it's kind of a nonissue.
And us Ubisoft critics can just sit there with a satisfied and smug look on our face.
Feels good, man.
Does Primal have like seven or eight missions as a 3-4 hour campaign? If not, I'm wondering why people keep comparing it to Blood Dragon.
Yes. It could very easily be many people's favorite game in the series.Is the game good?
Does Primal have like seven or eight missions as a 3-4 hour campaign? If not, I'm wondering why people keep comparing it to Blood Dragon.
I just assumed the location was the same? Although after thousands and thousands of years, granted, no location is really 'the same'.
It's definitely not light on content, but the campaign to be fair is pretty bare bones. That can be seen as a positive or negative depending on who you ask.
"Far Cry Primal uses a heavily modified version of the map in Far Cry 4."
I imagine that the people who bought this game won't care. This is the kind of thing expected from this game. So it's kind of a nonissue.
And us Ubisoft critics can just sit there with a satisfied and smug look on our face.
Feels good, man.
And us who are actually playing the game and know better can do the same. Feels good, man.
![]()
Can you kill someone in Primal and then boot up FC4 and dig up their bones!?
Doesn't Metal Gear Solid 2 and 3 share some animations and sounds?
There's being lazy and then there's being smart and efficient. You don't have to re-invent everything all the time.
That time you save some place can help you polish somewhere else.
What else would you call this? fan service? easter egg?
There's been a rumor going around that Primal was originally supposed to be 4's BD equivalent, but Ubi needed another $60 game for the year since AC isn't coming out. Don't know the amount of truth to it.
Can you kill someone in Primal and then boot up FC4 and dig up their bones!?
More like theories than actual sourced rumors. And FC4 did receive its own expansion, so Primal was probably a full price spin-off from the beginning.
They used the height map. The world is extremely different, as is the game itself. Not to mention how much nicer it looks and runs as well.
Who cares.
Is the game good?
If no one saw the minimap, this never, ever would have been noticed. It's not lazy (this word should be bannable considering how often it gets thrown around), and not a copy/paste job.
Nicely done. The game is great.And us who are actually playing the game and know better can do the same. Feels good, man.
![]()
That expansion wasn't standalone.
I'm struggling to understand how it's even possible that nobody noticed this until now. And I'm not just saying that. Someone more knowledgeable than I please explain the magic fuckery Ubisoft is employing to pull that off, especially since the rivers/lakes and mountains appear to be in the exact same place, and AFAIK a bunch of assets are being reused for this game.
As someone who platinumed FC4, consequently dumping a lot of hours into it, will I really not notice?
If noone noticed until now who cares
They did the same thing with Blood Dragon and 3 so... heh.
Was Blood Dragon 60 euros?