Yeah, they are gonna kill it. I just hope they go beyond of making Jones just the loud black woman, shit is just jarring or even worst that and Winstoned also.
Well considering this is the first big chunk of the movie we saw that's not going to be very difficult.
That'll be a long ass time.
Oh, and forgot to mention the wonderful stereotype of the street smart, loud, and violent black woman. I cringe so much.
It's in a weird position.
If the humour is different fans complain it's not like the original humour
If the humour is the same fans complain it's just ripping off the original and asking couldn't they do their own thing?
The trailer doesn't have enough humour in it to judge the movie overall.
And it is so much more fun on the second watch
I'm surprise we didn't see any originality flying around attacking people because it appears to be dead in this preview.
I don't think anybody is saying that racism/sexism doesn't exist, but it does get annoying that you can't just not like something anymore without somebody on the internet saying you have some ulterior motive unless it's obviously completely utter trash or primarily features white men.
I once was called racist for not liking Crossover! (.... Not really).
There was absolutely not sign of a fat joke in this movie and Mccarthy's humour is so much more than fat jokes and yet you just jump to a conclusion and use that to hate lol.Not too excited - looks like garbage. Can't wait for the inevitable scene where McCarthy can't get into her suit for 5 minutes.
Between this and Full House, it might be a tough year for 80s nostalgia. Time to let it go. At least Back to the Future day was fun.
The piano intro theme was cool though.
Nah it's ok to attribute every single action Of hers in this trailer to being black. Was it bad? Sure. But it's worth taking into consideration all the other factors.Just go all in why don't you.
I will say I actually like the way the ghosts look in this one. I was digging that much of it.
There was absolutely not sign of a fat joke in this movie and Mccarthy's humour is so much more than fat jokes and yet you just jump to a conclusion and use that to hate lol.
I don't know that "understated" is at all an appropriate term to describe 1984's "Ghostbusters."
Yeesh. I don't know what one is worse.
You are hilarious.
Email Sony Pictures, they may hire you write Pixels 2.
Gotta love those stereotypes of black people from a 2:00 long trailer. Those loud, violent, chicken eating, obnoxious, stupid black people. Ugh seriously Ghostbusters.
Happy to be proven wrong...in everything I've seen her in that has been a theme. I don't dislike her at all actually, and I like Kate Mckinnon a lot.
Well, humor is a weird animal. It's one thing to just rehash jokes of the original movie (which they seem to be avoiding, which is good) but it's another thing altogether to take a completely different humorous tone. The original GB was slightly dark, a little bawdy, had a lot of snark, and a little rough around the edges. It wasn't above having a joke about a ghost giving blowjobs or the stupidity of a giant marshmallow man or a joke about a giant twinkie. It let the actors breathe a little with the humor, it didn't need a laugh every five seconds, but the ones it got were better off for it. It was very 80s in that way. The cast made it. Murray, obviously had the snark down pat, while Egon and Ray had that perfect absent-minded scientist thing going on, and Winston was the straight everyman. It worked.
The reboot, to me, looks like it's just using that same 2000s half-assed tropey humor of being unexpected for the sake of laughs. Of course, it's just a trailer, so it could be highlighting parts marketing deems funny while leaving out the good stuff. To be honest with you, if I saw a trailer for the original Ghostbusters I doubt I would laugh once, because of the simple fact that the jokes aren't really that stand-alone: they're best in the moment. So, maybe the reboot just has these half-assed jokes for the sake of trailer material and the rest of it is effervescent character interplay like the first one was. We'll see.
Yeah I don't get why they made her the subway lady
Not a sequel
So why does the trailer open with 30 years ago the ghostbusters saved New York?
In the ghostbusters world, people basically have short memories. In Ghostbusters 2, a big part of the movie is basically thinking the GBs are full of shit/con artists.
Yeah the stereotype is disapointing but I give Jones credit for committing to the character because she's my second fav character in the trailer. I get the feeling she won't be fully Winstoned though.
She might come in later in the film but when she does she'll do stuff.
To me to get Winstoned is a 2 step process.
1)Come in late in the film
2)Have next to nothing to do when you do arrive.
To me the second step is the biggest problem.
It looks like Jones will be pretty active once she comes in. Also looks like she has a solo moment introduction avec ghosts instead of a job interview lol and will be more than "The Driver"
So why does the trailer open with 30 years ago the ghostbusters saved New York?
It's been out for three months and has 14 million views.
Yeah, he got the short end of the stick. But to be fair even if his time was short, god damn if he didn't make the most of it. Every scene and line of his is gold.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RtWbj-67M
That's cold.I'm surprise we didn't see any originality flying around attacking people because it appears to be dead in this preview.
Compared to most comedies nowadays
I believe this may be the original Ghostbusters trailer for comparison.
It is actually relatively serious as well apart from a few lines.It also pretty much gives away the ending.
Oh, and forgot to mention the wonderful stereotype of the street smart, loud, and violent black woman. I cringe so much.
According to Neogaf I'm racist because I thought the black woman could have been more than the stereotype and could have been one of the scientists or something. Good to know.
So why does the trailer open with 30 years ago the ghostbusters saved New York?
Like the only thing I noticed about that trailer is that Winston is barely shown and doesn't even get credit at the end.![]()
Predictably seeing all the "if you don't like it, you're SEXIST" crap roll out on social media from the hivemind.
That the children of that era grew up, got handed the keys to Hollywood, and haven't stopped making hard PG-13 & R-rated versions of the stuff they watched on SLP VHS tape in those days isn't at all surprising in that context.
I don't know that "understated" is at all an appropriate term to describe 1984's "Ghostbusters."