Let's not revisit.Or maybe we should look at what history taught us and see how Amazing Spider-Man 2 turned out....
Let's not revisit.Or maybe we should look at what history taught us and see how Amazing Spider-Man 2 turned out....
No I can't deny the depiction of her character isn't stereotypical.
If they put out a second trailer I think it's going to address a lot of the criticisms theyve been bombarded with.
Wish there was more outrage when gays mince across the screen in lots of films.
I can't help but think people are using the faux outrage for the stereotypical depiction of a black person, who if she had a problem with wouldn't take the role, as an excuse to hate this version of Ghostbusters.
I'd be very interested in a granular writeup of who disliked and why. I wonder what the ratio would be if you take out all the people who hate the film just because there were women in it.
I'm just glad it took a ghostbusters remake for people to start caring about stereotypes in black characters.
Have never seen Ghostbusters though.
I don't think this movie has anything to do with it. It, like Gods of Egypt are coming out at the wrong time as it pertains to black people. Folks have been outwardly more vocal than ever before. It at least seems that way from my perspective.
Why do I feel like Jason Reitman could have been a better fit for this? And I really like the idea of gender-swapping.
It's "The Power of Patty compels you".The only funny one was "the power of pain compels you".
That's a big crow.y'all do realise that if you're wrong about this thing the crow you're going to have to eat will be thirty-five feet long and weighing approximately six-hundred pounds, right?
Why do I feel like Jason Reitman could have been a better fit for this? And I really like the idea of gender-swapping.
y'all do realise that if you're wrong about this thing the crow you're going to have to eat will be thirty-five feet long and weighing approximately six-hundred pounds, right?
Why are people hung up about the black actress being a transit worker. It's really not a big deal. And it's actually misguided to just outright claim that she's acting very stereotypically if that's how she acts. It's like you guys want black people to act how you want them to act.
There are a million and one reasons to dislike the direction of a reboot with a vastly different creative direction, but only one that lets you wrap up your distaste in a way that makes you feel socially positive while typing "it's OK if there's one black member, so long as she isn't TOO black."It's like you guys want black people to act how you want them to act.
Should these same complaints be retroactively applied to the rest of her comedy career?That´s a horrible argument.
"That´s how she acts"
More like that´s how she was written, casted and directed.
That´s a horrible argument.
"That´s how she acts"
More like that´s how she was written, casted and directed.
It's not a sequel, it's a reboot.I like that they seem to be positioning this as a sequel instead of a reboot; I don't mind the female cast but I dislike the idea of pretending the other movie and it's cast never existed. With cameos from Murray and Aykroyd, I'm hoping it's more of a "we're too old for this shit, we need a new hero and you 4 look perfect."
I like that they seem to be positioning this as a sequel instead of a reboot; I don't mind the female cast but I dislike the idea of pretending the other movie and it's cast never existed. With cameos from Murray and Aykroyd, I'm hoping it's more of a "we're too old for this shit, we need a new hero and you 4 look perfect."
I have pretty big hopes for this movie, as both a Ghostbusters movie and a movie with Wiig and McKinnon in it, both of whom are pretty great (the other two are good, but these two are some of the funniest women around IMO).
This trailer left a lot to be desired, however. I'm going it's just bad editing, but this feels all wrong. More importantly, it wasn't very funny. The movie looks OK, but I'm hoping for a lot better than OK.
Why are people hung up about the black actress being a transit worker. It's really not a big deal. And it's actually misguided to just outright claim that she's acting very stereotypically if that's how she acts. It's like you guys want black people to act how you want them to act.
Also, super-forced humour 101.
To be fair, from what I understand, there are several cast members (including Murray) who hold various rights to the franchise. Even if the other three original guys (Aykroyd/Ramis/Reitman) had wanted to do a third film way back then, they would have needed to get Murray's approval to get it moving.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if they basically cajoled everyone into giving their blessings/agreement to push it forward.
Shit she could've even been the MTA worker who because of her personality couldn't get a job with her degree.
I think it was mostly just Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis and Reitman that held the movie rights. I don't think Weaver, Hudson and Potts held any stakes in the series. But yeah, Murray did give up his rights in 2012. Maybe because he was sick of holding onto them? I don't know. Sigourney Weaver may have jumped on board because she regretted not voicing her character in the videogame. I don;t imagine it took much to get Ernie Hudson or Annie Potts to return, for them it was probably like 'If everyone else is making a cameo, why not?'.
The reveal trailer did wreak of nostalgia push. That intro was so horribly implemented. But I won;t right this movie off so quickly. I will wait and see more before making more judgement calls.
Take it for what you will, but I've said this before on here. My brother is a huge GB nut - like "Hi I created a fan series of Ghostbusters and its' up on youtube and I bought a brand new Suburu Outback and turned it into a Ghostbuster-mobile, complete with my Ghostbusters logo" type fan. Anyway, he drove Ernie Hudson from (I think) chicago to someplace in MI for a convention and he got to chat with him a lot. He asked Ernie what he thought and, first things first, he said that Ernie was a nice guy but he had no real love for Ghostbusters. Basically, it was just a job. He then asked about cameo in new one, etc and Ernie basically said he turned it down until they offered him enough green to do it.
So no, Ernie did it for the green, not the "hey, I'll join the rest of the crew!" Again, you can take all this with as much salt that you want - I just know what my over-the-top-love-of-GB brother told me and I firmly believe him. LOL
Why do I feel like Jason Reitman could have been a better fit for this? And I really like the idea of gender-swapping.
it could have been handled better if it had a better cast, a better director and just kept in the same universe as the original
Dan Akroyd has tons of ideas in his scrapbook but the studio execs ignored it all and decided to go on their own with tacked Hard Reboot.
In the GB video game, they hinted that other chapters were operating in different major cities in the US like the Chicago chapter.
i hate the idea of a hard reboot that the studio execs took
it could have been handled better if it had a better cast, a better director and just kept in the same universe as the original
Dan Akroyd has tons of ideas in his scrapbook but the studio execs ignored it all and decided to go on their own with tacked Hard Reboot.
In the GB video game, they hinted that other chapters were operating in different major cities in the US like the Chicago chapter.
i hate the idea of a hard reboot that the studio execs took
Is it just me, or Milissa MaCarthy is just playing the same character in every movie she is in? Sort like what happened to Jim Carey.
I think it was mostly just Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis and Reitman that held the movie rights. I don't think Weaver, Hudson and Potts held any stakes in the series. But yeah, Murray did give up his rights in 2012. Maybe because he was sick of holding onto them? I don't know. Sigourney Weaver may have jumped on board because she regretted not voicing her character in the videogame. I don;t imagine it took much to get Ernie Hudson or Annie Potts to return, for them it was probably like 'If everyone else is making a cameo, why not?'.
The reveal trailer did wreak of nostalgia push. That intro was so horribly implemented. But I won;t right this movie off so quickly. I will wait and see more before making more judgement calls.
I feel this way too, but I haven't finished any of her movies due to me disliking her acting so maybe my opinion isn't too valid.Is it just me, or Milissa MaCarthy is just playing the same character in every movie she is in? Sort like what happened to Jim Carey.
Is it just me, or Milissa MaCarthy is just playing the same character in every movie she is in? Sort like what happened to Jim Carey.
I wouldn't say excellent, he is above average in the niche film be does but he stays inside his comfort zone and rarely does anything remarkable.
I doubt any of his movies will go down in history so I find excellent to be a bit strong.
I honestly can't believe he got ghostbusters when there are far more talented directors that would have really done it justice but you know that's just a personal opinion, I found Bridesmaids funny, I thought spy was funny in parts but fairly average in general.
I cringed through this whole thing. I wanted to like it but I just can't.
Engineer girl is cute though, reminds me of Britta from Community
Spy was phenomenal and I also loved The Heat.
Maybe excellent was a strong word but he's never let me down yet.