Is she losing it?
Hillary, you or your campaign staff has to start using Google.
Wow... it's like she's trying to double down the uninformed voter. How skeevy.
I'm not sure what Hilary thought she was accomplishing with that line. Unless her goal was to highlight how consistent her opponent has been on the issue.
Sure it is. Accusing someone of not leading the charge when you made sure no one else could lead the charge is fundamentally dishonest.That's really neither here nor there. The fact is she was leading the charge at that point.
If Bernie pulls an Obama and beats her I'll laugh.
Pity that's a long shot.
Liars get caught up in their web of lies.
Sure it is. Accusing someone of not leading the charge when you made sure no one else could lead the charge is fundamentally dishonest.
Alright, lets be really clear on this: Bernie was a largely irrelevant barely second term Congressman in 1993. His "support" was meaningless, him standing next to her at a speech is in no way the same as him having any sort of impact on legislation, either its crafting or possible passage.
This was bad research on Hilary's campaign's part, but it doesn't really change the meaning of what she was saying: that she has fought for healthcare reform in the country for a very, very long time, before Bernie was ever a relevant figure.
Is she losing it?
Bernie Sanders was a congressman. Bernie lost the election to hold the politically relevant position of First Lady.
Also, it's stupid to phrase something like that when it can come back to bite you.
"Where was he?" was meant to be a politically charged statement. This same scenario played out earlier in the campaign.
Hillary's zinger didn't work out this time. It's politics and her campaign gets hit for it.
You sound like some 60 year old Republican who listens to Rush all day
Deliberately clipping a lengthy discussion down to a single sound bite that looks bad is what you do to win over uninformed voters.
My sentiments exactlyAccording to Hillary within the last 4 days:
-Nancy Reagan started a national conversation on HIV/AIDS
-Bernie Sanders was absent from the universal health care fight of the 90's
-Bernie criticizes Bill and Obama but not George W Bush
-Bernie is a candidate supported by the Koch Bros.
I'm down for who ever the democratic nominee is, but it's hard to see the appeal of Hillary Clinton. She's the kind of politician that makes people cynical about politics.
I don't think Hillary was being deceitful. I think she just had an Admiral Stockdale moment and literally couldn't remember where Bernie was, along with her car keys.
If Obama was running for President again next year against Romeny, you're saying he shouldn't point out his experience as Commander-in-Chief because he is the one that kept Romeny from being President?
Yeah, I think she couldn't remember since it had been so long ago. Not really defending her, she shouldn't say shit like that unless she's 100 percent sure that what she's saying is factual. I mean, I can't even remember what I ate last night, I'd have a hard time remembering everyone that helped me out 23 years ago.
So I don't think it was a lie but it was definitely a big fuck up on her part.
I don't think Hillary was being deceitful. I think she just had an Admiral Stockdale moment and literally couldn't remember where Bernie was, along with her car keys.
According to Hillary within the last 4 days:
-Nancy Reagan started a national conversation on HIV/AIDS
-Bernie Sanders was absent from the universal health care fight of the 90's
-Bernie criticizes Bill and Obama but not George W Bush
-Bernie is a candidate supported by the Koch Bros.
I'm down for who ever the democratic nominee is, but it's hard to see the appeal of Hillary Clinton. She's the kind of politician that makes people cynical about politics.
No, I said if you've arranged for your husband to create a spotlight on you, asking why other people weren't in it is in disingenuous.If Obama was running for President again next year against Romeny, you're saying he shouldn't point out his experience as Commander-in-Chief because he is the one that kept Romeny from being President?
No, he actually shouldn't. You don't often hear incumbent presidents say "I've already done it for four years" as an argument for their reelection.
You sound like some 60 year old Republican who listens to Rush all day
She's trying to go after Bernie being happy to free-ride on the sidelines, but uh.... you gotta pick some better phrasing there.
What the fuck is wrong with hilldog's memory?!?
Maybe she can come out and lay claim to what you're giving her credit towards. Being coy certainly isn't being explicit if what you claimed is the angle she is going for. It's quite clear she is trying to discredit him, or at least rob him of his long standing health care convictions on the grounds that he didn't do nearly enough relative to her strategic take one the issue at that time.
No, I said if you've arranged for your husband to create a spotlight on you, asking why other people weren't in it is in disingenuous.
Hey man... Like, what's wrong with Rush?
I think they mean Rush Limbaugh and not the prog rock band Rush![]()
Eh, it's politics for sure, but the fact is that Hillary was leading the efforts at the time.
And if it wasn't Hillary, it wouldn't have been Bernie. He wasn't important enough.
If Obama was running for President again next year against Romeny, you're saying he shouldn't point out his experience as Commander-in-Chief because he is the one that kept Romeny from being President?
If Obama was running for President again next year against Romeny, you're saying he shouldn't point out his experience as Commander-in-Chief because he is the one that kept Romeny from being President?
Eh, it's politics for sure, but the fact is that Hillary was leading the efforts at the time.
And if it wasn't Hillary, it wouldn't have been Bernie. He wasn't important enough.
No one disputed that, though. You seem to have this backwards. It was Hillary disputing someone else's record erroneously and disingenuously, not the other way around.Eh, it's politics for sure, but the fact is that Hillary was leading the efforts at the time.
...of course you do. Every single President that has ever run for reelection has talked about their accomplishments in office.
I voted for bernie and you've completely missed the point. On topic of what is being discussed here, this is not a sensible reason in and of itself to switch your vote to someone else as many are asserting. The fact that something like this is the straw that broke the camel's back, and not any of the reasons you just mentioned, is sheer hilarity.
I dont remember letters i wrote my wife in the past ten years. Why am i supposed to?
I see. Well I think it's because many (most I'm guessing) people still aren't really paying attention unfortunately. I mean they might know a few things about each candidate or they may have heard Bernie is a broken record who cant get anything done and Hillary Clinton is the establishment politics as usual candidate, but many people don't really go and look into the issues and try to discern the fact from the fiction.
So they see small things like this on their facebook feed or in a news headline or wherever and for better or worse (worse imo) these are the types of things that people latch onto. It's a hive mind.
No one disputed that, though. You seem to have this backwards. It was Hillary disputing someone else's record erroneously and disingenuously, not the other way around.