It's 50/50 half in, don't think she will take it. Not that it matters at this point.
It's 52/47. She's winning it by 5 points.
It's 50/50 half in, don't think she will take it. Not that it matters at this point.
Anyone know for sure if Trump's twitter has handlers right now, or if it's really just him shooting these off all the time? I can't take the heartbreak that it's actually some intern doing all these.
It's 52/47. She's winning it by 5 points.
Any good politician would've posted that video.
Trump doesn't let babies handle his name
Yes, but Bernie will win California by 90%
Anyone know for sure if Trump's twitter has handlers right now, or if it's really just him shooting these off all the time? I can't take the heartbreak that it's actually some intern doing all these.
Does trump actually do his Twitter the Megan Kelly stuff is amazing
I'd be very surprised it was anybody other than Trump.Anyone know for sure if Trump's twitter has handlers right now, or if it's really just him shooting these off all the time? I can't take the heartbreak that it's actually some intern doing all these.
That someone other than Hillary is capable of winning against the Republican nominee in the general election.
Just checking in GAF. How is tonight going?
Glad to see that the number of counted precincts in STL was incorrect. I still think Bernie wins but seeing only 10% of a city of 300,000 with a majority (I think) AA population vote left me legit shook.
That's a plan I guess.
They haven't realized that delegates are handed out proportionally yet then?
Clinton vs Drumpf.
The dream is coming true.
Not sure what Rubio was thinking there.
Remember, Missouri is a red state. It doesn't count.Sanders' has got MO. For sure. Clinton has IL, also for sure. Both have finally come into focus over on the upshot.
Why did the media air Cruz's speech, but not Sanders?
Are you saying if Hillary loses to Trump it's the fault of Hillary supporters because Sanders might have been able to win?
This is postfactual reasoning! I think Sanders would probably do worse, so even if Hillary loses (probably impossible), I'd still be happy that we didn't lose as badly as Sanders would have.
I like Bernie more than Hillary, but no. Can't risk splitting the vote and giving the GOP the presidency.
Edit: Top of page again
That someone other than Hillary is capable of winning against the Republican nominee in the general election.
So when does Jeb resume his campaign?
Someone unable to win the Democratic primary is capable of winning in the general? I'm not quite sure that's how it works.
I'd be very surprised it was anybody other than Trump.
Wasserman over on 538 is saying that, despite the incredibly narrow margins in Missouri, Trump is on course to get 47 delegates there to 5 for Cruz, based on how the vote is distributed; and around 60 of 69 delegates from Illinois. This would effectively erase the deficit created by his loss in Ohio.
Funereal
well billions of people will have to die for one to happenAnd Ted Cruz will win sexiest woman of the year in FHM.
Equally likely.
For who
Nightmare is more like it...
For who
So if Trump holds in Mizzou and wins by 0.2%, how many more delegates will he get than Cruz in this "Winner take most" state?
Never.
I think this cycle has permanently put the Bush name out to pasture, and likely did some serious damage to Rubio, too early to say if it's permanent. Cruz will remain strong with Evangelicals but after this election I think he may be done on the national stage as well.
The Republican party going forward in 2020 will be very interesting to see. Who could have even guessed this would happen? I think lots of people saw the party implosion coming, but didn't expect it to happen this cycle.
For who
Someone unable to win the Democratic primary is capable of winning in the general? I'm not quite sure that's how it works.
Trump just can not help himself, lmao...
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/709941293477195776
nyt said:Hillary Clinton won a major political and psychological victory in the Ohio primary on Tuesday night, rebounding from her upset loss to Bernie Sanders in Michigan a week earlier, while also scoring landslides in Florida and North Carolina.
The results were a significant setback for Mr. Sanders, who was counting on his fiery arguments against free trade to help him prevail across the industrial Midwest. He spent heavily trying to win Ohio, Illinois and Missouri, but he came away looking increasingly like a spoiler to Mrs. Clinton, since she is far ahead in amassing delegates needed to win the nomination.
For Mrs. Clinton, Tuesday’s primaries netted her so many delegates that her lead over Mr. Sanders is now about three times what Barack Obama’s was over her in 2008. On a personal level, too, she and her advisers were reassured that regardless of her Michigan defeat, her political arguments about jobs and the economy had potency in states that will be major battlegrounds in the general election.
The revolution is just starting.#TheRevolution
Healthcare and education are human rights, we need our leaders to state this publicly again and again
As much as I want to believe...I don't think it's gonna be this easy. We've already under-estimated Trump enough.Can you think of a more exciting main event for Election 2016? I sure as hell can't.
Clinton stomps Trump seven ways to Sunday.