Garrett Hawke
Member
on the one hand it's Zelda but on the other hand, it's Nintendo lolI'm more than okay with this, but Nintendo better not cheap out on the voice acting.
Could go either way
on the one hand it's Zelda but on the other hand, it's Nintendo lolI'm more than okay with this, but Nintendo better not cheap out on the voice acting.
If true, hopefully the voice acting will be good. Right choice to keep Link silent. Only worry is that Zelda has a lot of eccentric/weird characters and voices may be hit or miss for them.
Interesting to see where this goes. Potential end of lip flapping!
If there's the same amount of 'character' with Link as there has been in previous ones, and they'll let you choose genders, they might as well go full on character creator![]()
*removes hood*Punished 'Venom' Linkle
Rumor 3: Ugh, I hated that in Dragon Age Origins. Silent protagonists don't work in games with voice acting.
How am I going to explain to my daughter that Link could be male or female?Well I guess the other thread got locked so I'll just reiterate what I said in here
What's up with all of these posts where people are seemingly angry about the potential of a female Link and give zero reasons why
I don't fucking get it
You can just ignore it! Just pick male Link! PROBLEM SOLVED!
Why is giving players a choice a bad thing??????
If there's the same amount of 'character' with Link as there has been in previous ones, and they'll let you choose genders, they might as well go full on character creator![]()
Whatever reasons they give will be bullshitWell I guess the other thread got locked so I'll just reiterate what I said in here
What's up with all of these posts where people are seemingly angry about the potential of a female Link and give zero reasons why
I don't fucking get it
You can just ignore it! Just pick male Link! PROBLEM SOLVED!
Why is giving players a choice a bad thing??????
That's pretty much my feeling on the matter. If you're going to go this route, just go the full ten yards.
Danny DeVito as a goron plz
If they're provide a gender option they should also provide skin tones as well.
How many fake nintendo leaks have their been? This sounds awesome but cool down the hype a bit.
If they're provide a gender option they should also provide skin tones as well.
This would be my big concern. Zelda passionately explaining why they must defeat Gannondorf, then looking over to a mute mannequin of a character who lamely nods his head.
It was excruciating in XCX, I don't know how they could make it work here.
Why is giving players a choice a bad thing??????
Does anyone think the NX version will have better graphics and framerate?
They took it out in ORAS tho didn't they? Hope it comes back tbh. And it would be nice if the next Animal Crossing had skin tones so that people who wanted to represent themselves accurately won't have to go tanning.They did it for Pokemon
Link as a character has always been relatively shitBecause this pretty much guarantees Link as a character is going to be shit. I would rather they just do a full fledged game tailored with Link being female then this half-measure.
Computer Gaming World said:Serious game players, especially CRPG players, have for years looked down upon the dedicated game machines as "mere arcade toys", and for years they were right. Those coin-ops without a coin slot did provide a lot of fun for people, but when they wanted a real game, they turned to their Apple II or Commodore (IBMs were too snooty, in those days, to stoop to having games on them). Even when the Second Wave of game machines debuted in 1987, no one felt any different. These new machines were actually powerful computers, but expressly dedicated to game play. Then The Legend of Zelda arrived from Japan on the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) in the fall of 1988, and heads began to turn.
Now, a truly great game should make people go out and buy the machine that plays the game. This has been a truism since the dawn of computer history: Software drives the
marketplace! Basically, the machine specs are really irrelevant; it is only the software that is available for a machine that matters to the consumer. Since I have 18 computers at home, I hardly needed to buy another machine. Yet, along came Zelda, and in 1988 a Nintendo was suddenly needed.
[...]
[Zelda is an example of] Japanese-designed CRPGs. While America has been concentrating on yet another Wizardry, Ultima, or Might & Magic, each bigger and more complex than the one before it, the Japanese have slowly carved out a completely new niche in the realm of CRPG.
The first CRPG entries were Rygar and Deadly Towers on the NES. These differed considerably from the "action adventure" games that had drawn quite a following on the machines beforehand. Action adventures were basically arcade games done in a fantasy setting such as Castlevania, Trojan, and Wizards & Warriors. The new CRPGs had some of the trappings of regular CRPGs. The character could get stronger over time and gain extras which were not merely a result of a short-term "Power-Up." There were specific items that could be acquired which boosted fighting or defense on a permanent basis. Primitive stores were introduced with the concept that a player could buy something to aid him on his journey. The dungeon mazes were incredibly simple by U.S. standards, but still, there was a hint of a CRPG.
When The Legend of Zelda burst upon the scene in fall of 1988, it hit like a nova. Although it still had many action-adventure features, it was definitely a CRPG. Fine graphics, exciting monsters, intriguing puzzle mazes and a wide variety of items to acquire were hallmarks of this game. But above all, it was entertaining.
Because this pretty much guarantees Link as a character is going to be shit. They're not going to do two separate storylines and I'm doubting they would even do small changes. I would rather they just do a full fledged game tailored with Link being female then this half-measure.
How many fake nintendo leaks have their been? This sounds awesome but cool down the hype a bit.