First look at ScarJo as the Major in Ghost in the Shell

Status
Not open for further replies.
Arise itself not so much, but The New Movie is a solidly crafted, well directed action thriller. It's worth seeing just for how well constructed and presented the large-scale action setpieces are.

Arise isn't particularly good and is somewhat inconsistent, but New Movie is a solid action thriller that I would actually recommend. They're definitely their own thing though, so don't expect them to match the tone of the previous films etc.

Cool. The movie's only $20 on Amazon, just picked it up.

I wish Rooney Mara was cast in this. ScarJo has more brand recognition and mind share I guess so I understand her as the choice but... man, I don't know. Something just isn't clicking with me here.

Edit -

Because Emma Stone was unavailable.

image.php
 
Rupert Sanders (“Snow White And the Huntsman”) is directing the anime adaption,

YArY6fs.gif


Disaster before it even finishes filming.
 
...Not my Major.

In seriousness, I'm still going to watch it.

I'm super curious in who they will cast as Batou. They are going to have Batou, right?
 
we all know the reality is that when Japanese tech people have the ability to create realistic humanoid robots, they aren't going to create robots to resemble petite asian women. they're creating white robots with big tits

see for example the dude who already made a scarlett johansen robot

every robot will be like a DOAX3 character, you know its true

scarlett johansen as the major is 100% believable

Despite having a name erica, this one looks ridiculously asian.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iW3_Ft1t0mY
 
Yeah, I agree with you there on all points. This is why in one of my first posts in here was not that she looked white, but that she just looks 'anime' which usually does feature Caucasian features to an extent. Not talking about the big eyes which most people would bring up, but more about general bone structure.

I never see the characters as white or anything but it's pretty indisputable that they almost never draw characters who have traditional Japanese features. When they do it is often used as a comedic prop or worse. In fact I have always seen Aramaki as a sort of deconstruction of that and a parody of WWII American propaganda(Shirow knows a LOT of military history). It's one of the reasons I didn't want to go down that rabbit hole.

They don't really draw characters that have traditional Caucasian features. I mean, distinctively white characters do exist, and they don't look much like your typical anime character:


Anime characters simply don't look human.
 
we all know the reality is that when Japanese tech people have the ability to create realistic humanoid robots, they aren't going to create robots to resemble petite asian women. they're creating white robots with big tits

see for example the dude who already made a scarlett johansen robot

every robot will be like a DOAX3 character, you know its true

scarlett johansen as the major is 100% believable

no

http://mashable.com/2014/06/24/japans-new-robots-are-scary/
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...male-robot-hit-japan-catwalk-article-1.367825
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/d...les/Robots-to-serve-guests-in-Japanese-hotel/
 
Despite having a name erica, this one looks ridiculously asian.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iW3_Ft1t0mY

Yeah, and even in my non-English speaking country babies are getting English names, but those have become kinda of accepted worldwide because English is sort of the de facto universal language. If some little kid was named Yosuke by his parents here everybody would think they came from a different planet. Unless they were Japanese immigrants of course.
 
They don't really draw characters that have traditional Caucasian features. I mean, distinctively white characters do exist, and they don't look much like your typical anime character:



Anime characters simply don't look human.

I really don't think people who are pointing this out understand what is going on.

In general, anime characters have more Caucasian features than what would be considered traditionally Japanese features.

That is why when they do have to draw actual Western characters they have to go to extremes to differentiate them and you get caricatures like this.

or this from a previous poster:


I mean look at how much of his face is taken up by that nose! And outside of Jay Leno chins don't really do that most of the time! heh

edit: Wtf he even has forehead dimples. What the fuck? Seriously. What the fuck? Is that even humanly possible outside of some rare medical condition?
 
Weird...that's like wal-mart generic brand scar jo with bad posture

Edit: what universe did i walk into where western remakes of japanese IP are white washing
 
I don't get the whole whitewashing argument in this particular case. First off, it's a fake body - there is no automatic reason for it to look Asian even if the brain is from a Japanese woman.

Furthermore, it's not being made by a Japananese producer/studio, so the idea that all the actors need to be Japanese is akin to saying the Japanese shouldn't perform Hamlet because they're not Danish.

I'm not arguing it will be good or the casting is wise, I'm just saying most the arguments against are ridiculous.

For example, Ghost in the Shell is very much about identity and consciousness beyond the physical form. What if part of the character arc specifically addressed this - what Kusangai has given up culturally by being a Japanese woman who has taken in a Caucasian shell. That's pretty fascinating to me.

Of course, we may not get anything that deep and it may all be crap, but let's judge after the art is made, not while it's being conceived and created.
 
It's a science fiction movie based on a cartoon whose most popular iteration doesn't even take place clearly defined setting. The story and concept that lends itself plenty well to localization, which is no doubt a big part of the reason this movie exists at all.
Frankly I don't think any of this is much stranger than having American Godzilla take place IN America, they even got a token Japanese dude to play one of the roles.

Localization should be the only argument and justification going around for this movie. I have no problem with them Edge of Tomorrowing GitS and changing names around to fit the cast and location.

But the people saying "Well she LOOKS white in the anime" and trying to justify casting a white person as a person named Motoko fucking Kusanagi because "white cyborg model" is some crazy shit. Imagine if there was a comic arc of Black Panther switching bodies with a white person for a couple issues and the MCU based the casting of BP on that one story and cast a white guy? Sure there could be an in-universe explanation for casting a white guy as Black Panther, but you can be sure as hell people would be giving Marvel shit for bending over backwards for loophole to avoid casting a minority.
 
It's a science fiction movie based on a cartoon whose most popular iteration doesn't even take place clearly defined setting. The story and concept that lends itself plenty well to localization, which is no doubt a big part of the reason this movie exists at all.
Frankly I don't think any of this is much stranger than having American Godzilla take place IN America, they even got a token Japanese dude to play one of the roles.

If you're talking about the 1995 movie, both the names of the major characters and existences of entities such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are clear markers of a story that takes place in Japan. I don't disagree that it's ripe for use an adaptation when American filmmakers have already admitted to borrowing liberally from it but that doesn't change that the film is indeed coded to a certain culture. I loved Speed Racer so whatever. I'm fine with them calling her Maggie Keaton, or whatever they've got planned (still don't think she looks the part despite race).

What I'm against is the notion that it's a film that's impossible to make or market without the use of a white actress. They could have completely gone for true adaptation with the film's Asian coding but didn't. Some might say that makes the film more marketable. I say they had an opportunity to buck a cycle of Hollywood dodging the opportunity to utilize people of color and chose to stick with the status quo.
 
Localization should be the only argument and justification going around for this movie. I have no problem with them Edge of Tomorrowing GitS and changing names around to fit the cast and location.

But the people saying "Well she LOOKS white in the anime" and trying to justify casting a white person as a person named Motoko fucking Kusanagi because "white cyborg model" is some crazy shit. Imagine if there was a comic arc of Black Panther switching bodies with a white person for a couple issues and the MCU based the casting of BP on that one story and cast a white guy? Sure there could be an in-universe explanation for casting a white guy as Black Panther, but you can be sure as hell people would be giving Marvel shit for bending over backwards for loophole to avoid casting a minority.

That analogy is absolutely ludicrous. Black Panther was born black. Kusanagi's body was made.
 
Localization should be the only argument and justification going around for this movie. I have no problem with them Edge of Tomorrowing GitS.

But the people saying "Well she LOOKS white." and trying to justify casting a white person as a person named Motoko fucking Kusanagi because "white cyborg model" is some crazy shit. Imagine if there was a comic arc of Black Panther switching bodies with a white person for a couple issues and the MCU based the casting of BP on that one story and cast a white guy? Sure there could be an in-universe explanation for casting a white guy as Black Panther, but you can be sure as hell people would be giving Marvel shit for bending over backwards for loophole to avoid casting a minority.

Yeah, the whole "anime characters look white anyway" argument is silly. Just say that American movie makers are changing the characters and setting to be more American to appeal to an American audience, just as Studio Ghibli's Arrietty and Marnie changed the setting from the original British novels to Japan to appeal to a Japanese audience.
 
Hollywood should have avoided all this controversy and just made a bad Deus Ex: Human Revolution movie rather than a bad Ghost in the Shell movie. That already stars a boring generic gruff white man. It's perfect for them.
 
Eh, I think she looks the part. The movie's still gonna be garbage, but not because of her.

GAF's casting preferences don't mean a thing, though. They wanted a big star as the lead, and they got one.
 
Can't believe we have to explain anime style here.

It's also unbelievable through how many hoops people here jump to try to make Major Kusanagi white.
 
What I'm against is the notion that it's a film that's impossible to make or market without the use of a white actress. They could have completely gone for true adaptation with the film's Asian coding but didn't. Some might say that makes the film more marketable. I say they had an opportunity to buck a cycle of Hollywood dodging the opportunity to utilize people of color and chose to stick with the status quo.

I will say that I would have preferred to have an asian actress, just for the sake of diversity but I also can't think of anyone who would fit. I don' really agree with Rinko Kikuchi because I don't know if she could pull off the action sequences and I really don't think she is a good actress. However, I haven't seen her in anything comparable I guess. Has she ever done an action movie lead before?

I also hate the fact that everyone just assumes the worst of directors in this situation. Who is to say that ScarJo didn't just blown them away at the auditions? I really do think she is a great actress, though I guess others don't feel the same way.

However, I really do get a kick out of everyone all up in arms over skin color in relation to GiTS. I am sorry, but the messages and theme of the series in almost all of its iterations has went completely over your head as far as I am concerned.

As others have said Kusanagi's character has always revolved around the disconnect between her true self or 'ghost' and the throwaway bodies or 'shells' she uses to her advantage. In Innocence isn't there a part where she literally borrows sex dolls to get the job done? She doesn't give a damn and I always imagined she picked the sexiest body possible most of the time just because it came in handy as another tool for her to use.

Its right there in the fucking title. SMH.

Are you sure you're not a tiny bit biased, there?

I'm married to an absolutely beautiful Japanese woman, so no I don't really think I am. lol

As I have said before, it is an unfortunate truth but if you really believe that Japanese culture doesn't idolize Western features in a lot of cases, then I don't know what to say. It stretches far beyond niche things like anime and permeates a lot of the culture.
 
I will say that I would have preferred to have an asian actress, just for the sake of diversity but I also can't think of anyone who would fit. I don' really agree with Rinki Kikuchi because I don't know if she could pull off the action sequences and I really don't think she is a good actress. However, I haven't seen her in anything comparable I guess. Has she ever done an action movie lead before?

I also hate the fact that everyone just assumes the worst of directors in this situation. Who is to say that ScarJo didn't just blown them away at the auditions? I really do think she is a great actress, though I guess others don't feel the same way.

I'm not a casting director but I'd imagine just as there are a wealth of white actresses with different skills, types, and prowess, there's a wealth of Asian actresses with the same that are rarely considered because the heads' already "just see a white woman in the role. You know, for relatabliy's sake".

And I'd love to think that Hollywood is all about giving people a fair shake where the job only goes to the person who always blew everyone out of the water but people in the industry have consistently demonstrated that that's not the case:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/24/arts/hollywood-diversity-inclusion.html?_r=0

Sure maybe ScarJo was good but putting aside race for a second, is it about the best person for the job or bankablity? Because I've heard both in this topic now. If they only chose Scar because she makes money then they've already dropped all pretense of looking for the most potent person for the part in the first place, white or not.
 
I'm not a casting director but I'd imagine just as there are a wealth of white actresses with different skills, types, and prowess, there's a wealth of Asian actresses with the same that are rarely considered because the heads' already "just see a white woman in the role. You know, for relatabliy's sake".

And I'd love to think that Hollywood is all about giving people a fair shake where the job only goes to the person who always blew everyone out of the water but people in the industry have consistently demonstrated that that's not the case:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/24/arts/hollywood-diversity-inclusion.html?_r=0

Like I said I agree that more diversity is a good thing, but I also think that Hollywood is doing better on that front than ever. Still a long way to go, but it has gotten a lot better.

And reducing ScarJo to be just a 'white woman' is not any better in my opinion. She is a talented actress and a lot of directors would probably kill for her to be in their movie.
 
Like I said I agree that more diversity is a good thing, but I also think that Hollywood is doing better on that front than ever. Still a long way to go, but it has gotten a lot better.

And reducing ScarJo to be just a 'white woman' is not any better in my opinion. She is a talented actress and a lot of directors would probably kill for her to be in their movie.

Cool, they've gotten better than 60 years ago. That doesn't mean much to the people in the article who are still having a bitch of a time in Hollywood due to outdated notions

Like I said in my edit, I've heard both she's the best and she makes money. Even if the audition ad said "looking for white actress", then what's the merit in even claiming that they picked someone who killed it when we also know that Hollywood is more than capable of choosing bad actors or people that don't fit only because they sell?
 
Cool, they've gotten better than 60 years ago. That doesn't mean much to the people in the article who are still having a bitch of a time in Hollywood due to outdated notions

Like I said in my edit, I've heard both she's the best and she makes money. Even if the audition ad said "looking for white actress", then what's the merit in even claiming that they someone who killed it when we also know that Hollywood is more than capable of choosing bad actors or people that don't fit only because they sell?

I would say it is even better than it was 10 years ago.

Also, guess what? Even as a white actress ScarJo is marginalized to an extent because she is a woman. That is a point expressed in the article you just linked.

She obviously has it better than a lot of people, especially now that she has become popular, but I find it a little bit disingenuous to just write her off because "white people, right?"

I would expect that as an attractive actress in Hollywood she has had to deal with her fair share of bullshit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom